foetz wrote: that's on diegel's ftp. although having a typo in the name
I seem to be blind thank you
the bourgeousie is ultimately a repressive institution, and I hate it ...
foetz wrote: that's on diegel's ftp. although having a typo in the name
jan-jaap wrote: ... if you think working at a startup is matter of taking it easy while you burn though someone else's money you've got it all wrong. Those who work for a startup usually work very long hours for a reduced salary (if any) -- the reward is that you will be (part) owner of a successful company if things work out, the risk is of course that you will be left with nothing if the startup doesn't take off.
robespierre wrote: These notes are really great.
http://blakemasters.com/peter-thiels-cs183-startup
armanox wrote: For the prices that the 600MHz (and 2x600) come up for, I'd lean towards just buying a Tezro instead.
In 1993 Alias started the development of a new entertainment software, later known as Maya which would become the industries most important animation tool. Steven Spielberg chose Industrial Light & Magic to provide the visual effects in 1993's Jurassic Park. In turn the animators at ILM picked PowerAnimator as the software of choice to model the huge prehistoric beasts. They delivered the very real looking dinosaurs with PowerAnimator and reaped the Oscar for Best Visual Effects.
vishnu wrote: it says at the top of the page he cribbed it from the Alias website history section. ...
guardian452 wrote: We are really looking forward to the new JP... it is going to be sweet.
foetz wrote: we?
astouffer wrote: Just think how cheap and easy it would be to counterfeit these
vishnu wrote:mopar5150 wrote: ...they are usually hammered or missing parts.
It's a never ending source of amazement to me how bad of shape these things are in, given what their original owner's must have paid for them you'd think they would have cautioned their users against mishandling, if not deliberate abuse.
jan-jaap wrote: Maybe there's a market for this kind of stuff regardless of the brand ?
bittenbyte wrote: ... silicon graphics ceased to exist in the last turmoiled SGI (aka rackable) financial switch. leaving behind the IP from IRIX, XFS, and as a result there is no legal entity that can claim property of the source code.
Kumba wrote: A lot of the proprietary stuff was reportedly spun off to an external entity called Graphics Properties Holdings Inc (GPHO) or such.
prnewswire - June 2010 wrote: Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc., an asset management company owning over 300 patents used for graphics, computer and display segments, is in the business of managing its patent portfolio and realizing value for its owners through licensing and other means. GPHI is owned by private investment funds and other institutional investors following the bankruptcy of its predecessor, Silicon Graphics.
Contacts:
Bradley Scher, President
Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc., (914) 235-1075
James M. Bollinger, Esq.
Troutman Sanders LLP (212) 704-6113
SOURCE Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc.
bittenbyte wrote: the desktop was not the most valuable part, it did make the experience unique, and usable from a graphics app.
Oskar45 wrote: About 40% of Americans deny evolution. Sad.
rwengerter wrote: If someone is willing to port from Windows to Irix there is one more choice:
FreePCB: http://www.freepcb.com
foetz wrote: why did you run the disk exercise at all?
josehill wrote: Did you try repartitioning as an option drive (i.e. no swap partition), laying down a new filesystem mkfs, and then repartitioning as a root drive (or root/option drive) and laying down a new filesystem on the root or root/option drive? That process blows away the old swap/miniroot and has always cleared up any odd miniroot problems I've ever had.
calvin wrote: Likely for Hololens.
robespierre wrote: this is for your own good.
TeamBlackFox wrote: Indeed, it also had no concept of privilege separation.
opcode wrote: Just as the subject says. I am looking for a reasonably priced card to connect a presenter 1280 to my Indy Cable would be great too!
jsloan wrote: If I load a linux distro on a mac laptop, just where am I setting that dial ?
jsloan wrote: How would you avoid this ?
Code: Select all
./configure --prefix=/usr/nekoware --enable-threads=posix --enable-c++
Code: Select all
cc-1132 CC: ERROR File = /usr/include/sys/types.h, Line = 536
The namespace "std" has no member "time_t".
__SGI_LIBC_USING_FROM_STD(time_t)
^
cc-1132 CC: ERROR File = /usr/include/sys/types.h, Line = 537
The namespace "std" has no member "clock_t".
__SGI_LIBC_USING_FROM_STD(clock_t)
^
cc-1132 CC: ERROR File = /usr/include/internal/time_core.h, Line = 221
The namespace "std" has no member "time_t".
extern int cftime(char *, char *, const __SGI_LIBC_NAMESPACE_QUALIFIER time_t *);
^
cc-1132 CC: ERROR File = /usr/include/internal/time_core.h, Line = 231
The namespace "std" has no member "time_t".
extern char *ctime_r(const __SGI_LIBC_NAMESPACE_QUALIFIER time_t *, char *);
^
cc-1132 CC: ERROR File = /usr/include/internal/time_core.h, Line = 232
The namespace "std" has no member "time_t".
extern struct tm *gmtime_r(const __SGI_LIBC_NAMESPACE_QUALIFIER time_t *,
^
cc-1132 CC: ERROR File = /usr/include/internal/time_core.h, Line = 234
The namespace "std" has no member "time_t".
extern struct tm *localtime_r(const __SGI_LIBC_NAMESPACE_QUALIFIER time_t *,
^
cc-1132 CC: ERROR File = /usr/include/time.h, Line = 7
The namespace "std" has no member "clock_t".
__SGI_LIBC_USING_FROM_STD(clock_t)
^
cc-1132 CC: ERROR File = /usr/include/time.h, Line = 8
The namespace "std" has no member "time_t".
__SGI_LIBC_USING_FROM_STD(time_t)
^
cc-1174 CC: WARNING File = test-sys_time-c++.cc, Line = 28
The variable "signature_check28" was declared but never referenced.
SIGNATURE_CHECK (GNULIB_NAMESPACE::gettimeofday, int,
^
8 errors detected in the compilation of "test-sys_time-c++.cc".
*** Error code 2 (bu21)
*** Error code 1 (bu21)
*** Error code 1 (bu21)
*** Error code 1 (bu21)
*** Error code 1 (bu21)
*** Error code 1 (bu21)
jpstewart wrote: I don't see any loss of functionality by skipping the C++ stuff.
delorie.com wrote: The last release of libltdl used some symbols that violated the POSIX namespace conventions. These symbols are now deprecated, and have been replaced by those described here.
armanox wrote: Paranoid much are we?
uunix wrote: I'd like to congratulate England ladies reaching the Semi final of the Women's World Cup. Playing better than the men at the moment.
TeamBlackFox wrote: I don't understand why one needs a GUI editor? Vi(m) never hurt nobody!
zagnut wrote: I've decided I just want to use this as an NAS RAID.
Will I be able to access the array from a Windows machine? I've yet to look up the partitioning types for Irix. I know theres 1, maybe 2, Linux distros that will run on the Octane. For simple NAS and RAID, that should work fine hopefully.
guardian452 wrote: That said, I do know how to follow instructions
commodorejohn wrote: Besides, it seems like it would be much simpler to just port Basilisk to IRIX.
zagnut wrote: For my photography needs, as a redundant storage device, it should serve well.
guardian452 wrote: Years of using Apple products have reduced my tolerance and patience levels below what is required for getting FreeBSD going on a laptop, at least a thinkpad.
vishnu wrote: And it doesn't complain about the xserver missing the XSGI extension?
foetz wrote: mips3 does however let it run on, well, mips3 machines