The collected works of hamei - Page 24

kjaer wrote:
Hamei, you're acting like an asshole. Your choice, but it's not engendering a lot of interest in hearing what you have to say I think.

Well, see, here's the deal with that .... I'm not in kindergarten any longer, don't have to worry about getting that check mark under "plays well with others." I don't really give a rat's ass what Americans think. They have abrogated any rights to have an intelligent opinion by the way they have behaved over the past thirty years. Have you looked at the US recently ? Bluntly, it's a piece of shit. And it's not me who did that. 'Project for a New American Century" - are you people insane ?

Fact. Denial is more than a river in Egypt. Do you have eyes ? look around you. The US is a piece of garbage. There's nothing there there. it's gone. You gave it all to "business interests" who made "business decisions" and eviscerated the country. You ain't got shit. Finance, Real Estate, Insurance, Sewage. You got nothin' ....

Listen to R10 ... "computing is moving at such an exponential pace that you can't get attached to any particular flavor" (umm, so "brand" is worthless ?) ... then when questioned what he does ? PowerPoint, text editing, and spreadsheets. Oh whooop-dee-doo. It's all hot air and marketing horseshit.

You guys can stand around and oooh ! and aaaah ! over the Emperor's beautiful royal blue coat with the blazing gold epaulettes and the shimmering tan Italian slacks and the hand-tooled alligator boots all you like. But what's parading down the road is a scrawny limp-dick naked old fart with a pot belly and saggy ass. The consumer computer industry in the US has done nothing for the past ten years. In fact, I'll go a step farther - with the exception of the scientific community telling you that humanity is hell-bent for destruction and you guys grabbing the throttle with both hands to twist it wider, the entire US has done exactly nothing of value ever since the finance -slash - business people took over. For the past thirty years the US has been nothing but leeches. Useless, greedy, ignorant stupid leeches.

I don't really care if people like it or not. You can ooh and aaah the Emperor all you want. I ain't gonna. I'm just speaking truth.
GL1zdA wrote:
You may not like his style, but this shouldn't justify calling him an asshole.

That's okay, GL .... facts are facts. No point in calling a janitor a "sanitation engineer." :)
vishnu wrote:
When it comes to text editing, by which I'm pretty sure R-ten-K mean "programming," in my case I find my productivity drops to zero if I don't have a display that can do at least two 80-column files side-by-side at at least size 10 font, which means I need at least 1900 pixels horizontally, and thus I've never been been able to be productive in my day to day work using any laptop screen I've ever been exposed to...

If we got you a screen that was 2860 pixels wide, would you create 50% more good code per day ? :P
vishnu wrote:
Either that or we'd stumble yet again across the law of diminishing returns... :lol:

Hate to tell you this, vish, but you're obviously not Manager material. You have a basic grasp of reality :(
vishnu wrote:
I know! I can tell because I stopped believing in reality a long time ago but it never went away... :shock: :lol:

You better stop posting this stuff in public or you'll never get a white collar position in Management. Any real manager does not believe in Reality, even if it reaches up out of the grunter and takes a big chomp out of his ass. They can always come up with some horseshit loser excuse to explain away their stupidity, even when it flies in the face of the facts. Heck, especially when their story flies in the face of all fact.

Look to Mr Greenspan for your inspiration, that guy is a true master of Business Logic. Got a degree, too. He must be smart !

A little practice in gobbledygook and perhaps you, too, could qualify for the Harvard Business School. You could be a Visionary ! An Innovator ! A fucking useless fool with a big salary ! Wouldn't that be cool ?


guardian452 wrote:
hmmmm, reminds me of my theme-park-ride-operator days...

Not a chance. Theme parks are too smart to hire MBAs. You have to have a functioning brain* to operate potentially dangerous equipment.


* i.e., can deal with problems more complex than, "How much larger will my bonus be if I fire two guys in q/c and threaten the rest with losing their jobs so they shut up ?"
vishnu wrote:

Haysoos, did you read that crap ? "She leads approximately 46,000 people across more than 130 sites ..." What does she do, organize expeditions to steal a pickanick basket ? What do you do on Mondays, vish ? Get on the plane for the 130-site obstacle course, with Ms Hudson carrying the flag ?

Who writes this shit ? Do they teach grammar in school now ? Has the world been commandeered by a generation of pimply ignorant little twits ?
mgtremaine wrote: Ezekiel 23:20 <- !! :lol: Just quietly lurking, browsing the topics, agreeing in my mind then I had to google your sig.... Starting laughing, my wife asked what I was laughing at. ;)

What I can't understand is, why would anyone want a boyfriend who farted like a horse ?
fu wrote: we used to burn books back then, now we're burning minds.

Inverse totalitarianism and the managed democracy.

Although i don't think we need to stretch so far for an answer. Fascism fits the description of the situation perfectly. Let's go to the horse's mouth :

"Fascism is the operation of government for the benefit of the large corporations."
--- Benito Mussolini
fu wrote: i pity the kids,

I do not. At least the Americans embrace it. They love it. They swallow that shit as if it were ambrosia. Tell them they are full of nonsense and they scream like you are taking away their V10 Dodge crewcab dually diesel with leather interior dreams. At that age everyone I knew was throwing rocks at the Establishment and burning cop cars. Kids now (not your artist-types but normal Americans) are pounding on the Establishment's door to get in.

They will die. You can't eat gold.

everything they grow up in is phoney these days.

Yup. From the tomatoes on down*, phony as a three dollar bill. "Business logic ! Business ethics ! Profit ! Profit ! Gotta make a proooooofit ! Efficient use of reeeee-sources !" (As in, put it all in my bank account, you peasants.) Talk about the Big Lie .... diarrhoea is what it is.

* I have a quick civilization gauge : eat a tomato. If it tastes like cardboard, the society is worthless.
guardian452 wrote: Well, I'd like to tell you all about my dream, it's a place
Where strip malls abound and diversion's mere moments away
Where culture is defined by the ones least refined
And you'll be left behind if you don't fit in
It's all distorted in americana, my way
guardian452 wrote: so, as a layperson... I suppose it's another excuse to party? :mrgreen:

This is really cool ! now we will have something small enough to use as a comparison with the average MBA's intelligence !
josehill wrote: Can't I just enjoy a cool grape on a hot summer afternoon?

vishnu wrote: If they'd finished the hole in Texas it would have been found 10 years ago, at least.

Funny :P
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/07/opini ... le.html?hp
smj wrote: ... one of my favorite songs (" Supercollider ")

Here we go again with the downloads. You guys are gonna get me in trouble.
vishnu wrote: "A-Hole in Texas"... :P

So Bush has his autobiography out already ?
Oskar45 wrote: Regarding Christianity...

Beating up on Christians is cheap, like shooting fish in a barrel or sending the Dream Team to represent you in the Olympics. How about taking on a few more stoopid religions ? Such as Business, the Invisible Hand, Free Markets, finance insurance and real estate, Pareto mathematics, entrepreneurs and innovators and all the rest of the braindead ignorant stinking crap that the US and Europe slavishly worships today ? It's no different than the retarded garbage in the bible but a hell of a lot more popular nowadays.
Oskar45 wrote: According to various polls, about 85+% of Chinese do believe in God.

You believe that ? And then you have the gall to laugh at Christians for believing in creationism and the virgin birth ?
Oskar45 wrote: What I was trying to suggest is that China - whether it believes in God or not - most certainly slavishly worships quite the *same* stoopid religions ...

... he says, sitting in his rocking chair half the globe away with no knowledge whatsoever of Chinese people, Chinese culture, or Chinese history. But hey, he's got a poll !
Potentially have a connection for an 800 mhz Fuel pimm. The guy is talking $300-ish but here is China, we'd bargain over a seat on the lifeboat of the Titanic. Won't do me any good so if someone is interested, I can follow up. No, $50 won't fly :)
Another one from the people who brought you Wednesday Night Bowling ... this one was my touring bike, finally got the guy who bought it to send over a photo. Looks like it was geared for the moon. Ontario, maybe ? I built the engine pretty much from scratch.



No, it's not cool. It's stupid fucking shit. Maybe they should all stand around in a circle and play with their dicks, it would be about as useful and more entertaining. Morons.
pentium wrote: Nice to see you are in a happy mood today. 8-)

Just the facts, ma'am. Just the facts.

If you can point out any significant differences between chimpanzees Twittering away in the trees four million years ago and "social networking" I'll happily kiss your hairy black treeborne ass.
guardian452 wrote: Does society want/need anything different?

Exactly ! It's the same damn thing we've been doing for four million years or more. Over the back fence with the washing, down at the bar on Friday night, chattering in the trees about where the best fruit is. There's nothing new or innovative or world-shattering about any of this crap. It's nothing but gossip.

Global climate change is not an Algore hoax, there are five million too many people for the amount of food, the coral reefs will be gone, kaput, out of existence in one more generation, the rich bastards have stolen all the resources of the US but what are these dorks blathering about ? "Oh it's so cool ! Timmy revolutionized the Human Experience !"

What a pile of crap.
josehill wrote: No doubt that a few hundred years from now, we will be paying for tools to filter out messages like "Xoraxia392's Scandalous Mind Meld with the Cynerian Ambassador Exposes Her Surgically Enhanced Insectoid Ovipositor!" from the subspace feed into our cranial implants.

Jose : there won't be humans in a few hundred years. We are too stupid and greedy. Humanity is not going to suddenly see the light.

It's over. The fat lady is standing in the wings.
guardian452 wrote: But the American commentators are historically always lousy ...

Doing anything but "rah ! rah ! rah ! for Our Team !" is not acceptable. Joe Namath was a color commentator for about three games : he was great and of course really knew his way around. But after he said, "Well that was sure stupid. It's third down. He needed eleven yards and threw for six. What's the point of that ?" it was over. Next week he was gone. Kenny Stabler, same deal.

Anything that interferes with the business of televison advertising is forbidden. And people talk about censorship in China ....
NeXT specialists http://www.blackholeinc.com/ wrote: Tim Berners Lee using a NeXT we integrated for him ...

What, they bussed it to London ? :)
kramlq wrote: Its great attention to detail I think..

Oi, I s'pose only 'murricans would catch the reference to a black computer being "integrated" for T B-L. So you can laugh to yourselves about how the great unwashed misses the cosmic significance of Mr Berners-Lee's contribution to Knowledge, but y'all miss the hilarity of his suppliers "integrating" a black computer.

Which group is lacking in knowledge ? Everyone knows a lot about something and not very much about everything else. When do the flying people come bringing money ?

josehill wrote: Black Hole's website is pushing the limits of what a NeXT web browser can handle.

It's not absolutely necessary to have all that modern crap, jose. They could do a plain-jane html site and make it attractive and work well.
josehill wrote: Don't make me break out the blink tags! I will use them! I don't care who gets hurt!!!

Ha ha, html doesn't <blink>work</blink> here, nananner nanner :P

Just think how we could change history if we could go back in time ... smash netcrap before it began. Send Guido over to Bernie Lee's house to encourage him to re-think that www fiasco. And last but definitely not least, the bozo who invented voicemail could spend eternity chatting with Jimmy Hoffa. Heaven on earth ......
GL1zdA wrote: By doing it in Word 2007?

Code: Select all

<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<meta name=ProgId content=Word.Document>
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12">
<meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Word 12">

hey GL1, c'mon, man ... this is a post-modern world where everything is an imitation of a reconstruction of a myth dancing naked in some yuppie's latte-addled imagination. You wouldn't want the superhuman NeXT people to have to use a NeXT application, would you ? That shit's like ooold , d00d !
josehill wrote: All this time, maybe Hamei really has been right about everything.

It's okay, Jose. Don't you listen to that stupid girl. Been a long long time since you were home, nasty trip to deal with them vulture capital guys, you've got to be all worn out. Just run on in and have a nice hot bath, that'll make you feel better.


Here's a little story to entertain you while the water heats up ... an acquaintance just sent me a print to look at. I think it was kind of a test, actually. Really good part, says right on it "PRO E CAD/CAM GENERATED" so the designer guy has to be one of the smart ones doing all the high end profitable work in the US

Too bad the material is wrong, the heat treat is wrong, the process is wrong, the part is maybe not junk but it sure as hell ain't optimum.

GE part. Some control piece for a jet aircraft.

It is statistically unlikely that that is the only part on the plane designed by a kid with no real knowledge.

Think about that next time you take a trip. Does it control the flaps ? Spool up the engine ? Is it going to quit in the middle of the next take-off ?

Ha ha, just ol' hamei ranting again.

Profits, mah man. Profits and business, that's where it's at.
melchez wrote: Still using a NeXT then.

Oh yeah ... like riding a twinkie Evo is the same as a shovelhead, unh-hunh.

OS X sucks, okay ? It's not NeXTStep and it ain't Unix. It's for the chiiiiiildren yuppy bullshit. Get over it.
josehill wrote: Not sure what your definition of UNIX is, hamei, but even Mountain Lion is certified as meeting v3 of the the UNIX specification .

It can meet the Unix specification until the damned cows come home but Unix is a trademark. Trademark ... business guys should know that word, right ? Intellectual Property, all that ? There are what, four or five operating systems that are qualified to call themselves Unix. And only those four or five can legally and ethically call themselves Unix.

A Mach kernel transformed through NeXTStep into some cartoon parody of an operating system does not qualify as Unix, no matter how much noise the fanboyz make. An Arntz Cobra is still an Arntz, not a Cobra, no matter what engine is under the hood or how accurate the bodywork looks.

josehill wrote: ... I'm not too keen on some of Apple's feature decisions and support policies but I can still do everything that I really want to do with it, especially on the command line.

But NeXTStep came with development tools that made it simple for B-L to create the www. One can do anything they desire on any operating system they choose, but is it likely to happen ? On NEXTStep, it was. The system was designed for that. OS X, not so much. Apple wants consumers, purchasers, willing sheep with cash-filled pockets to shear. NeXT was oriented to scientists, researchers, technical users. Not the same. Not even similar. We live in the age of the Java interface.

Gag me with a spoon.
josehill wrote:
Martin Steen wrote: I don't care if Mac OS/X is a "real" Unix. Unix is not the holy grail. As long as I can use
all that Posix-stuff and do "./configure, make, make install", it's Unix enough for me.

Yep. I think that's the bottom line, eh?

No it isn't "the bottom line." Joseph, Mary and the Baby Jesus, what do you people use your brains for, spacing your ears out ?

"Look, my computer has a terminal, therefore it must run Multics !"
"Oh look, I can do "cd <directoryname> ! I must be using AIX !"
"Looky looky, mine has directories, therefore it must be DOS !"
"I've got a compiler, mine is System 36 !"
" My Chevvy has doors, therefore it's a Ford."
"Oh hey, my X1/9 has the engine in the middle, therefore it's a GT-40"
"My Vega is red, so it must be an Alfa !"
"Look, my diploma is written on paper, therefore it's a check for $800,000"

Stupid. Stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid. Just because all the Apple fanboyz want it to be Unix doesn't mean it is Unix. If wishes were horses, there'd be an entire cavalry of beggars. Here's a free clue for those of you who were not listening in the fifth grade : resemble != is .

(And if Unix is not the holy Grail - with which I certainly agree - then why do people keep insisting that "OS X is Unix ! OS X is Unix !" ... ? Gotta problem with your self-image ?)
duck wrote: ... my ImageMagick doesn't support ordered bayer dithering ...

Don't know if it supports layered dithering either but duck - try Graphics Magick. Much better operation over mutiple cpus, faster, more stable, better guys running it. Bob Friesenhan (sp ?) knows his stuff, is very responsive to questions or complaints. It compiles with MIPSPro no problem.
This is a useful piece of work, geo. Thank you. :D
geo wrote: Wanna lend a hand there hehe or still busy with your motif browser? :) if im done with this i can also help you.

I'd love to, but kind of busy right now getting the text big enough so I can put the magnifying glass away :)
I'm trying to find a place to change the scroll bar so it's wide enough to grab. Not having much luck :( Anyone know if / where there might be a setting for that ?
recondas wrote:
editres ?

editres doesn't like me very much :(

Quote:
The less elegant method would be to manually change .Sgiresources or .Xresources. You'll probably want to double check my googled up syntax in the man pages before you pull the trigger, but something like:
Code:
*.XmScrollBar.width: <your desired width in pixels>

Check ? you gots to be kidding. I'm a trigger-puller. Sadly, no luck with that so far but excellent suggestion ! I was searching in 4Dwm, should searh under Motif or maybe mwm ... back to Boogle, thanks !

btw, while rooting around I found an interesting tidbit - the adjustments for frame width and cursor-grab frame width are different. So (I think) you can set the frame width skinny for appearances (if you like that) but the frame grabber w i d e for convenience. Pretty nice !
smj wrote:
[REDACTED]

Wasn't paying attention - you meant 4Dwm itself. "Oh... Nevermind."

Come back later, you can redact the bad words from what I have to say about Fireflop ... gawd that program is a pile of shit :( Thunderturd, five minutes research and ten more with userChrome.css and it's okay. Not perfect but okay.

Fireflop, change this and that changes. Change that and this changes. How to change what you really want ? The Fine Mozilla Organization has a help-you page ! Full of examples of help-you things you can do ! But not one single item that's actually useful !

What universe do those idiots come from ? Can we arrange a pre-emptive strike ?

Still haven't got a way to widen scroll bars yet ... but 33 hz is plenty fast on refresh. You can't tell it isn't 60 or 72 or 85. (But I don't play games. Movies are fine.)

On to a more pleasant subject ... it's pretty easy to change icon sizes and fonts in the 4Dwm file manager. Unfortunately, if you had "save continuously" checked all the sizes you don't want got saved and apparently unchecking it doesn't get rid of the old data so now things are all different sizes. Is there a system-wide way to clear out all those saved attributes ?
vishnu wrote:
At the risk you might not know this; I'll point out that when you make changes to an X resources file you have to do `xrdb -merge filename` for them to take effect. That, or log out and back in again. Also, for editres to work editres support has to be compiled into the application, and not many vendors do that...


I noticed that you can actually just do a "xrdb <filename>" and that seems to work too. Maybe that's the default on Irix ?

Most of 4Dwm has been pretty straightforward ... still haven't found a scrollbar adjustment but other than that, not so bad. Did learn how to set colors in an application to follow the desktop scheme, which was kind of cool.

It's that useless unpredictable piece of garbage Fireflop that is the biggest problem. userChrome.css doesn't work for crap. No surprise there .... I just wish the next time somone decides to go postal that they would do it in the Mozilla bunker.