The collected works of hamei - Page 22

pentium wrote:

Code: Select all

$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/nekoware/lib/firefox-2.0.0.22pre /usr/nekoware/lib/firefox-2.0.0.22pre/firefox-bin
<Peanut>  1716:/usr/nekoware/lib/firefox-2.0.0.22pre/firefox-bin: rld: Fatal Error: attempted access to unresolvable symbol in /usr/nekoware/lib/firefox-2.0.0.22pre/firefox-bin: sqlite3_os_switch

Try (c shell or tcshell) :

Code: Select all

urchin 10% setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH /usr/nekoware/lib/firefox-2.0.0.22pre
urchin 11% /usr/nekoware/lib/firefox-2.0.0.22pre/firefox-bin

If I try to run it your way I get a bunch of error messages about missing "libsmime"

Kira wrote: Basically, I don't see how Firefox2 could possibly be working with sqlite above 3.4.2, since it relies on functions that are, quite simply, gone; Pentium's problem should affect anyone using Nekoware Firefox and the beta sqlite.

Quite possibly. But this sqlite version does permit fireflop to start and run and not crash. I have no idea if it actually does anything, but at least it doesn't blow up the 'flop ....

Edit : those useless assbreath Down's Syndrome poster children at Fireflop ... :evil:

http://aplawrence.com/Web/firefox-sqlite.html

tastes great, less filling !

http://downloadsquad.switched.com/2009/ ... databases/

Morons. Absolute useless godforsaken morons. Let's fix fireflop 2 for Irix and let the mouth-breathers run FF3+ ....
sgienthu wrote:
Here my results:

Imagehttp://flic.kr/p/bmLDqU

Sorry no good news... :(

Here's a trick you will like : when you get a winterm like that, put your mouse cursor at the end of what you want. Depress the left mouse button and swipe to the left up to the beginning of what you want. This will highlight all the test you "selected". (Works the other way also but I am right-handed.) Release the l eft m ouse b utton (aka lmb). Now drive the mouse cursor over the desktop or an open directory display-window (or even a closed one's icon). Press the m iddle m ouse b utton and it will drop a text file onto your desktop. It will be named "Pasted Text" and you can then rename it.

Now you can paste that into any application you want, such as the message window on your web browser.

Beware : after you get used to this you will become addicted to it. Windows does not have this feature.
Alver wrote:
Apart from that, MPE/iX isn't really the system you would *want* to run at home, I think... I honestly can't think of a single proper use for it :) if someone does, do tell.

Running an international drug smuggling ring from your basement ?
The quick fix is to close Fireflop and reopen it. That solves the problem for a while ....
sgienthu wrote:
At last I found it!

It was a problem with library libpng.so.3 version. I have just updated it and now Pixie runs.

Did you update from /current or is that a new libpng from /beta ? If you'd give the neko_libpng-1.2.47.tardist in /beta a try and make a post about it in Development, that would be a help to the Nekoware Updating Program.

Thanks for reporting back, anyhow :) There are a few users here who could take a lesson from your good manners. And I mean the word "users" literally :(
pentium wrote:
Talk about a dirty fix. :roll:

I agree. But Fireflop has so many serious problems that spending a l0t of effort on this small thing when you can fix it by closing and reopening is not very productive. You're welcome to do things the hard ways if you like, though, Pentium :)
robespierre wrote: That is the "Indigo2 Video for Impact" board. http://lurkertech.com/lg/ev1s.html

As opposed to the "Impact Video for Indigo2" board .. I swear, SGI marketing must have had a connection for the best smoke in the state. :P

This is the better video option , isn't it ?
telackey wrote:
FWIW, closing and reopening never helped for mine. I imagine it is a question of exactly where the offending libraries have been located in the address space.

With my setup, at least, when it starts doing that "such and such a jpeg cannot be displayed due to errors" trick, it is going to crash bigtime very very soon. That error seems to be indicative of a three-legs-broken, just-hasn't-fallen-down-yet situation. So I close it and repen at that point and it's usually okay for a while. With javascript turned off it manages to go longer between episodes of
Code:
urchin 3% WARNING: core: firefox-bin: PID 57478, failed to write a  text area (core file deleted)
moz_run_program[36]: 57478 Bus error

I've also got a huge list of blocked */*ads* domains in my fail.cnf file, which helps somewhat ....
Wow. Everybody must be asleep, because I think you just made quite a few people very happy :D
kubatyszko wrote: I wouldn't be surprised at all if this was some kind of I2C signal between MB and that PIC inside.
I will give it another try and keep it running for longer to observe FanC - so far within 15 minutes of uptime nothing changed.

If you are experimenting with the faulty mainboard (makes sense), don't forget that the part that has the fault is the environment monitoring chip, so that could be giving you bad readings.

Another soldering project :mrgreen:
johnsmith wrote:
So I've been doing some product design with TurboCad, which can export .vrml files. I can view that on my o2 with CosmoPlayer, but was wondering if there is a way to import it to iiview?

Not sure about vrml but there was a series of converters floating around for 3ds, Softimage, Wavefront, dxf, iges and some other formats to Inventor. They worked pretty well. Your Turbocad should be able to export in iges or dxf.
NCommander wrote: When did firefox start depending on Xrender :-/. ...

Pretty sure that was right about the same time that they stuck their heads firmly up their asses :P
kubatyszko wrote: What I have already done with ATX is good enough and allows me to use it as a PSU replacement with env monitoring off.

It's a match made in Heaven - a mainboard that wants env monitoring off and a power supply that wants env monitoring off. :P
kubatyszko wrote: At roughly 63 Hz, I get 1753 RPM reading which makes it more of 58Hz, but that's fine as long it's above the 1600 threshold.

This is very cool and I imagine a bunch of Fuel owners owe you a big thanks !

But I have to admit I'm a little disappointed in the lowly 1600 rpm value. 300,000 was a lot more impressive :D

The Inverter-based solution has an advantage (5 of them in fact), with 1 chip you can generate 6 independent square waves - just in case if somebody wanted to fool the Fuel in regards to other fan's :) , another minor advantage of inverter-based is that you don't need to worry about duty cycle, it's always 50%.

This might be a good trick for using alternate low-noise fans in other boxes, like the O300 or O350. Of course, one would lose the environment monitoring .... do you feel like another project ? How about a ten percent signal amplifier ? That would give us several other options for fans that are just a tiny bit too slow, especially at startup ...
87Porsche wrote: That display is niiiiiice.

Almost as nice as my eight year old IBM monitor :P

But a lot smaller ........
fu wrote: i bumped into one that wasn't in the accounting dept. this time and did some lower-thirds on it. yup its a decent monitor

Snag the one that's in accounting, fu. They don't even know what it is .... Trade them for some flashy Dell and they'll be happy as clams :D

This is kind of interesting ... http://ignco.de/437
fu wrote: sky did you notice any (over)heating issues while using it?

Just in his pants :P
Okay ... looked through 400 pages in the Intertubes, never did find anything so had to put every CD in the drive and make a list which I can now search. If it helps anyone else, welcome to this :

(solaris 10 update 7 for sparc, last one available on CD)

Attachment:
solaris10_cd_packageslist.zip [6.63 KiB]
Downloaded 12 times
In general, Mplayer on Irix works great. But there's a few videos that do this ....

It's almost right ... sound is perfect. Where should I start looking to see why some video has this not-quite-synched-up stripe pattern ?
diegel wrote: In my experience -vo gl2 is a workaround for this problem.


Oooh. Nice, thanks ... fixed about half of my problem videos ...

What is the reasoning behind the various output options ? I've been using vo=sgi:textures:softcs and that's worked well on most videos. Is OpenGL always better if you have that option ? Since SGI does OpenGL in hardware, would you think it should normally be a better choice for us ?


Edit: Okay le, did a little testing. Thanks for the pointer to gl2, I had lazily assumed that once you found settings that worked, they would work across the board. So, for posterity ...


With the nekochan version of Mplayer, there are several output options. You can set defaults in $home/.mplayer/config. I usually watch a video by just dragging the file icon over the mplayer icon. This is a case where the workplace shell would be great - make three or four copies of the mplayer object and change the parameters of each one. Viola (don't call me Shirley), you can easily run different videos with different settings. MaxxDesktop with Porter's SOM would be the best desktop ever for Loonix. Oh well.

Anyhow, I ran the same video through the five or six useful ones : < mplayer -vo help > (turning a video into tiffs was not what I want to do at the moment, but might be worth looking into for screenshots - like when Michael Douglas lost the purse going over the falls, but there it was in the next scene and you want to pick up the frame that you know shows it flying through the air).

vo = sgi is opengl, seems the sharpest and least dropped frames
vo=gl is opengl, I can't see much difference but may as well go with the sgi-optimized version
vo=gl2 is not as sharp but as diegel points out, other output options might solve problems with display of some videos
vo=sdl is not as good, in fact I saw a lot of dropped frames on several videos. But again, it may work in certain instances. Plus it's good for testing neko_sdl :)
vo=aa is kind of interesting but not very useful, except for a special effect sometimes. Try it, it's kind of a trip :D

The lesson, thanks to Mr Diegel, is to not get lazy and assume that your output options are the best for every video. If there are display problems, one of the other choices may solve the problem for that video .
Boy is Solaris fun !

Sun Studio 12.3 appears to be working. I grabbed a bit of code off the Innertubes for a test and ...
Code:
7% cc test.c
"test.c", line 1: warning: old-style declaration or incorrect type for: Display
"test.c", line 1: syntax error before or at: menu
"test.c", line 1: warning: old-style declaration or incorrect type for: menu
"test.c", line 1: warning: old-style declaration or incorrect type for: until
"test.c", line 1: warning: old-style declaration or incorrect type for: press
"test.c", line 1: warning: old-style declaration or incorrect type for: by
"test.c", line 1: warning: old-style declaration or incorrect type for: using
"test.c", line 1: warning: old-style declaration or incorrect type for: child
"test.c", line 7: warning: old-style declaration or incorrect type for: main
"test.c", line 12: newline in string literal
"test.c", line 14: syntax error before or at: Main
"test.c", line 15: newline in string literal
"test.c", line 16: newline in string literal
"test.c", line 17: newline in string literal
"test.c", line 18: newline in string literal
"test.c", line 19: newline in string literal
"test.c", line 20: newline in string literal
"test.c", line 21: newline in string literal
"test.c", line 22: newline in string literal
"test.c", line 23: newline in string literal
"test.c", line 24: newline in string literal
"test.c", line 25: newline in string literal
"test.c", line 26: newline in string literal
"test.c", line 27: newline in string literal
"test.c", line 30: newline in character constant
"test.c", line 38: "case" outside switch
"test.c", line 40: warning: implicit function declaration: wait
"test.c", line 44: "case" outside switch
"test.c", line 50: "case" outside switch
"test.c", line 52: "default" outside switch
"test.c", line 53: newline in string literal
"test.c", line 54: newline in string literal
"test.c", line 55: syntax error before or at:
"test.c", line 57: warning: syntax error:  empty declaration
"test.c", line 58: cannot recover from previous errors
cc: acomp failed for test.c

MIPSPro also gives a ton of errors on the same file. Interesting that they aren't exactly the same. Nice tutorial.

Anyhow, the compiler appears to be working. But all the apps I want complain about (config.log)
Code:
configure:2890: checking for gcc
configure:2920: result: no, thank god
configure:2983: checking for cc
configure:3004: found /opt/SunStudio/prod/bin/cc
configure:3027: result: cc
configure:3146: checking for C compiler version
configure:3155: cc --version >&5
cc: Warning: Option --version passed to ld, if ld is invoked, ignored otherwise
usage: cc [ options ] files.  Use 'cc -flags' for details
configure:3166: $? = 1
configure:3155: cc -v >&5
usage: cc [ options ] files.  Use 'cc -flags' for details
configure:3166: $? = 1
configure:3155: cc -V >&5
cc: Sun C 5.12 SunOS_sparc 2011/11/16
configure:3166: $? = 0
configure:3155: cc -qversion >&5
cc: Warning: Option -qversion passed to ld, if ld is invoked, ignored otherwise
usage: cc [ options ] files.  Use 'cc -flags' for details
configure:3166: $? = 1
configure:3186: checking whether the C compiler works
configure:3208: cc    conftest.c  >&5
"conftest.c", line 18: internal compiler error: DBGGEN ERROR: FILE="../src/dbg_libdwarf.c", LINE=46, Could not load dwarf library: libdwarf.so : ld.so.1: acomp: fatal: libdwarf.so: open failed: No such file or directory [DBG_GEN 5.3.3]
cc: acomp failed for conftest.c
configure:3212: $? = 2
configure:3250: result: no
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h */
| #define PACKAGE_NAME "GNU make"
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "make"
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION "3.82"
| #define PACKAGE_STRING "GNU make 3.82"
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "[email protected]"
| #define PACKAGE_URL "http://www.gnu.org/software/make/"
| #define PACKAGE "make"
| #define VERSION "3.82"
| /* end confdefs.h.  */
|
| int
| main ()
| {
|
|   ;
|   return 0;
| }

This isn't what I want but gmake should be a short simple test case to get the dumb thing running. It appears to want libdwarf. No problem, dload the source to libdwarf and configure ... oh-oh. Libdwarf also wants libdwarf to compile libdwarf. This could be a problem. I can't find stinking libdwarf anywhere on the Solaris CD's and no clue on the useless godforsaken Intertubes.

Where the hell is it ?

And here I thought MIPSPro was kind of a pain .... :(

(But I did discover that Sun likes to rename and reorganize every single part of their operating system for every release. Cool ! no wonder they went broke.)
yetanother**ixuser wrote:
libdwarf is in the packages SPROdwrfb and SPROdwrfx.

Thank you. I finally found them in the SunStudio stuff. A fresh download (500 megs) and a reinstall and I now have them. They should have installed the first time but stuff happens ...
Quote:
I dont know on which cd this crap is on, cause i only use jumpstart to install solaris machines.

Good idea. If I had to install Solaris on a regular basis I'd have myself pre-emptively committed. Nice software, TERRIBLE organization. And WHY do they have to change the names of everything every three weeks ? It's about as stupid as Firefox flipping the "cancel" and "save" pushbuttons or moving the settings from edit -> preferences to tools -> options. Serves no purpose except to annoy people and make everything that's already documented meaningless.Worse than meaningless, confusing. I'd love to go to their parking lot one lunchtime and move the gas pedal to the left, put the brake pedal on the passenger side and make the steering go left when you turn right and vice versa. Would be fun to watch when it was time to go home. Ha ha, would serve those jerks right.

If Oracle had spent as much time straightening things out as they did changing "Sun" to "Oracle" everywhere, Solaris could be pretty nice.

Quote:
but when i comes to compiler deployment i would generally recommend to install ALL the packages.

V100 is tiny. No room.

It's actually a surprisingly great little server. No nothing - no graphics, no scsi, no usb, no way to attach anything externally, no pci slot, slow cpu. Specs-wise it's a pitiful little thing. But it works good !

I think they effed up on that computer ... doing a Core (basic) Solaris install on a V100 installs Infiniband, Gigabyte ethernet, Fiber Channel, all kinds of things that are junk, as far as a V100 is concerned. And the V100 has a small disk. They sold the hardware, they should have made a special V100 Solaris Install Package that would go zoom-zoom onto the disk and given small businesses a running web / file server in three easy steps. The thing works nice but it's a nightmare to get into a usable running condition. And who thought up that horse's ass disk partitioning scheme, then made it the default ? What a mess.

Is this a clue to why Sun went broke ? An MBA can manage any business, eh Sky ?
VenomousPinecone wrote:
Other than Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri, what can I do with this?

Give it to your mom. They are perfect for that.
VenomousPinecone wrote:
Depressing. :lol:

Moms are people too, my friend !
pip wrote: Also, you should take a look at the TenFourFox project if you haven't heard of it before.

Whoa ! Gotta love it ! Altho i tend more to turning Javascript off rather than making it faster (it's nothing but a rattlesnake hiding under your bed) the rest of the project looks dang good ...

http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox/

and OS 9, too ...

http://www.floodgap.com/software/classilla/
mattst88 wrote: What the heck were they thinking when they started depending on technologies that our beloved IRIX doesn't have?! Don't they know how many IRIX users they have? I can't believe they'd alienate such a huge and important user-base like that. And, doing all of that over the objections of the many IRIX developers who begged and pleaded with them to just not use such a new (from the year 2000!) technology like Xrender.

To be serious for a moment, what did they accomplish by making this change ? On purpose, I keep up to date with Fireflop on Windows and use it at least half an hour a day. Version 11 here right now (Did Autodesk Disease strike Mozilla ? Straight from 3 to 10 ? Nice.)

From a user's perspective, it is not one bit better than version 2 on Irix. It doesn't crash as often but that's the only improvement. It still locks up, ignoring the user, if you load several slow sites in tabs. STILL , even though this behaviour was discouraged in 1995. Books were written about how to avoid this but our great wunderprogrammers at Mozilla apparently can't read. Are they are too busy incorporating "new technologies !" that don't achieve a damned thing to actually fix the fucking useless code ! ??

And oh ! the Javascript is 200 times faster ! That's nice. Now websites can add 200 extra javascripts to track me. That's a real improvement. Super, Mozilla. Thanks.

It's all well and good to sneer at users because we aren't current, uptodate, high-falutin' gofast groovy withit technogeeks but that voice would carry a little more weight if all this churn actually accomplished something. As it is, Firefox 11 is still shit. All the Xrender, gtk2, whizzbang lovely New Technology gimmicks in the book can't change that. Whacking one's wee-wee about how cool and groovy the latest greatest is, doesn't make the app worth spit.

Let's reposition this discussion to a different setting. I have a 150 mph race bike. The front brakes don't work very well. I come flying into turn 11 and grab a handful, get nothing, go down on my ass. Push the thing back to the pits and what does Mozilla want to do ? Install a halogen headlight and fuel injection. "It's great new technology ! You're just snivelling !"

No. I'm not snivelling. The Mozilla idiots don't fix the real problems but they do make their new versions unworkable on anything besides their own dream platform. That's why Phoenix exists - Mozilla was a loser twelve years ago and they are the same losers today. All they managed to do was destroy the product that people really wanted.

btw, Mozilla ? The Browser Wars were over fifteen years ago. You lost.
kubatyszko wrote: I wonder what's gonna happen when they catch up with Chrome - in terms of version numbers of course, since this seems to be how they still try to fight - by increasing them without any real improvements under the hood, I've given up on Mozilla some time ago, had to apologize only once (this morning actually) when Japanese Yahoo Auction said No to Safari and No to Chrome - their "wysiwyg" auction editor doesn't support either of my browsers, had to go to FF to shut it up, thanks Yahoo. I'm pretty sure they only meant support for IE [[vomiting]]

It really looks like a rerun of the browser wars. I'm even back to using smartcache to get rid of all the crap that websites are trying to jam down my throat. ESAD, websites.

Oh, and Dillo, nah didn't have time, might give it a try sometime but haven't moved anywhere beyond failed attempts to compile fltk due to that XBOW messed up.

fltk was easy, even I got that to work :) It was the next step that caused difficulties ... anyway. As oreissig points out below us, lots of people are happy with the new browsers. If they want to do whatever they do, that's cool. I have no real complaint with friesflop 2.00.0000.00022 except that it crashes and locks up. The other options I've looked at require too much expertise, time and effort to get running. So I ordered a bigger hard drive and plan to put 2.00.000.22.000 up on cvs and start there. Strip a little crap out here, make an improvement there, fix a couple of the fatal flaws somewhere else, maybe borrow some repairs from other projects, see what can be done. The FoxTenFour project is kind of inspirational. Eventually it would be nice to rework that mess to fix the basic design flaws but even if that never happens, forward movement is better than falling behind. Even if it quit doing

Code: Select all

urchin 3% WARNING: core: firefox-bin: PID 57478, failed to write a  text area (core file deleted)
moz_run_program[36]: 57478 Bus error

on a regular basis, that would be an improvement.
yetanother**ixuser wrote: *looool* is this rick james?? :lol:

Arthur Lee ... different personality, different music, similar taste in clothes :P
josehill wrote:
hamei, where's the party?

You're trying to bait me .... this dork must be a member of the famous McMuffin family, a Ziff-Davis shill to the last. What an imbecile.

It was funny that he'd (supposedly) quote John Akers, tho. Akers never touched a computer in his life, couldn't even type, and ran IBM off a cliff it has never really recovered from. Three biggest quarterly losses in the history of Wall Street, totally missed the peecee revolution, got within an inch of bankrupting the most powerful computer company the world has ever seen, but this drooling retard quotes him as a reputable source. Typical dickwad "technical" writer. No wonder the country is so ignorant.
josehill wrote:
hamei wrote:
You're trying to bait me ...

No, not really.

Just kidding. I was going to answer "In my pants !" but thought someone might take offense :P
Quote:
I agree that it was a very lame article.

What an ignorant jerk .... but that's what we expect from Ziff-Davis. Computer Currents* ran some intelligent comparisons while we were all waiting for Chicago. That's when i decided to go for OS/2. Their factually-based conclusion was that everything about OS/2 was better except that it had higher hardware requirements.

But since you could see that memory prices would drop considerably in short order, well .... going with Windows 95 would have been a mistake. Win95 was a joke compared to OS/2.

Quote:
I'm remembering debating the pros and cons of OS/2 and those new PS/2 machines with some of my college chums after the announcement, and suddenly I am feeling very, very old.

Hey, if you remember riding Dinny through the jungles you'd be old ! 25 years is nothing. It's well within the margin of error for the creation of Earth, in some circles :D

* Is Gigglebytes stashed anywhere on the innernet ?
tingo wrote:
... but the seller describes it as "junk".

"Junk" on the Japanese auction sites just means "untested, sold as-is". It doesn't mean the part is actually junk. But it doesn't mean it isn't, either :) Pig in a poke ... but generally, anything I have bought from Japan has been well take care of.
GeneratriX wrote:
I guess I'm not risking too much if I say that FreeCAD will be probably the first truly parametric 3D modeler breaking into F.O.S.S. lands as potential industry standard for little shops... and maybe not so little ones too.

APT is not foss but it's public domain, even better :P Not only that but it's proven ... SR-71, Apollo missions, XB-70, Boeing, Northrop, Douglas, North American Aviation, GE, Pratt & Whitney .... Totally parametric, three d, can handle shapes that the graphical apps can only dream of, nice program / language. No point and click though.

$900 seems pretty high to me for something you can't do anything with. I could see an 8" cube as being useful ....
nekonoko wrote:
And as luck would have it, the entire ISP goes down a few hours later :)

Are you sure you don't live in China ? :P
GeneratriX wrote:
Well, I need to reckon I'm completely lost (seriously) and never heared about that! ...could you point me to some useful URL to start to grasp a bit the concept? (APT related, you know)

APT stands for Automatically Programmed Tools or any variety on that theme ... It's both a language and a program, came from MIT originally at the same time that CNC was developed / invented / designed, and by many of the same people. Then the aerospace industry took over development ... it was the very first ANSI standard and most of the aircraft built before 1980 would have been designed with APT. It was still common into the 90's ... the wikipedia page is not bad but if you're lazy ...

First step is to define the part using geometry statements. Common entities include circles, lines (in fact it's all 3d so a line is just a specialized form of a plane), cones, spheres, parabolas, hyperbolas, surfaces, mathematically-defined arcs, whatever. If you've played with FORTRAN the conventions will be familiar ...

CIRCLE1 / CIRCLE, POINTA, DIA 6
LINE2 /LINE, 12, 17, 44, TANTO, CIRCLE6

and so on ... gazillions of ways to define each entity.

The next section is tool movement commands - turn on spindle at 3000 rpm clockwise, turn on coolant, start from point A, rapid to point B, go forward to the intersection of plane one with circle three, turn left on circle three at four inches per minute to the intersection with plane five, rapid to the start point, turn off spindle, turn off coolant, rewind, fini.

Rewind refers to tape, of course. Did you know that SR-71 missions were controlled by a computer running paper (mylar) tape ? I think until the very end. Funny.

These days maybe that's too much work for people but compared to an HP-41, it's a dream. Also, as you can imagine, it's quite a bit more powerful than graphics programs if you are more of a programmer than a clicky-the-picture sort. For families of parts, just change the dimensions on your geometry. Run the part definition through the interpreter again. Viola, new part, same program. GE built entire families of turbine engines with a spreadsheet and APT loooong before MySQL was a gleam in Larry's gimpy eye.

The program is in the public domain - hard to find the source code though, it's so old and not sexy for the anti-aliased fonts crowd. Easiest way to try is to get a trial copy of Personal APT (web search) which is a subset of the complete language. Bob Drewry was involved in the original program, he's retired and messes with this in his dotage. He's created a Windows shell for today's users, I much prefer the DOS version. Price for the whole thing - program, manual, postprocessors - is around $300. Or was, last I checked. It's worth it. The manual alone is a full course in machine tool programming.

There were several other versions of APT out there but I believe most have fallen by the wayside. The military still uses it, I'd imagine. They've got all those B-52 parts to keep in inventory.

Quote:
All in all, I knew from the start that FreeCAD is not into the same leagues that the biggest ones.

I've messed with every free cad app I can find, you can bet on that :) I don't like any of them very much. To tell the truth I am surprised there aren't any nice ones. There have been a few with promise but they seem to have fallen by the wayside. They are all so busy playing with their dicks that they forget the purpose of a CAD program - to draw/design stuff. 80% of the screen is icons. Hey ! Where's the damn part go ? Over here in this postage-stamp-sized mini-window ? :P

Quote:
Even on IRIX lands would be a more than nice addition! But my Octane needs some maintenance before to be able to try to port or run anything again. Remember: I'm saying FOSS...

There is also Irit and that BRM CSG thing. Neither of those seemed very exciting from the point of view of machining tho.

Quote:
don't bring to the table CATIA, PRO/ENGINEER, etc...

Nah, I understand. But APT is going to kick ass over anything from Open Cascade for the next century. Much five-axis work is still done in APT. Just a few years ago it was all done in APT, because the graphics apps couldn't handle the math :)

Quote:
But for some little lost-wax pouring models would be cool... amateurs, hobbyists, etc.

Not to be mean but I can't see it being good for that, even. For small delicate work you want a very high-speed spindle and good rigidity and accuracy and repeatability. Little parts have details in the .0001"s. If the best your machine can repeat is .0005" (with luck) then you're going to be disappointed. That kind of accuracy isn't free. That little thing is so flimsy Ahnuld could crush it in one hand like a beer can. I can't see it being useful for anything at all.
Oskar45 wrote:
Mrs. Brown lives anywhere you want her!

Oooh ! Oooh ! Uncle Martin and I had to move :(
nekonoko wrote:
It's basically a business-class SDSL line, but it runs me $250 a month

Ouch ! And I thought our so-called "service" was overpriced ! We get especially good web filtering, tho :P

Does your isp snivel about running a low-traffic website on a normal dsl line ? I'd think you could run nekochan on a less expensive service without causing any harm (except to your ISP's pocketbook :D )
jan-jaap wrote:
And to think I have fiber-to-the-home, with TV, telephone and unrestricted[*] 50Mbit (up and down, soon 100Mbit!) network for 60 or 65EUR/month. A fixed IP was a one time administrative fee of 25EUR ....

FTTH is pretty common here, too. Residential is $22.50 a month but then, we have certain restrictions :) Business gets shafted to make up for it, our crappy 512 mbit connection that has been slower than molasses ever since the worst company in the country, China Crapicom, took it over, runs about a hundred $$ a month.

Mr Neko, I notice you do your own DNS. How does that work ? Can you just set up a dns server and the other dns servers will pick you up, or did you have to get integrated into the Greater Internet in some way ? I need to better understand dns, since that's the biggest tool they use to mess us up. I can say with some authority that putting a known-good dns server address in your setup doesn't help, they still manage to poison it. Thanks, Cisco.
GeneratriX wrote:
Anyway, sorry, you're right... I always use Google and Wiki for everything, but this time I given up too soon when I noticed a lot of non related results.

If you are interested in early computer developments, I'll try to attach something historical. I found it interesting ....

Quote:
Yes, I know what you mean. I can see easily the beauty behind such no non-sense approach compared to any amateur class GUI, but I would be lying if I say that my actual rythm of life can support such thing for routinary work.

There's a "project" called Heekscad / Heekscam ... kind of funny. Part of what they are attempting to do is re-create APT in python. Except it appears that they don't even know of APT's existence ? APT was written and tested to the max by every major aerospace company in the US, three guys in their mom's basement are going to do better ? It's free and public domain, but they feel they have to recreate the wheel ?

Sometimes you gotta wonder what people have between their ears. A lot of what they are trying to do looks nice but jeeze. Anyway ...

Quote:
I'm still more biased to think about some retrofit including some heavy milling machine, and so on... mainly because any real CNC, even if it is a many years old second-hand, is way expensive in my country.

We have a lot of small sign shops making engraved plastic products with small cnc routers (with very basic z-axis control). They aren't very expensive. I've thought for a while that one of those would make a great base for a backyard cnc mill. They are MUCH more rigid than most of the scary shit I've seen on people's websites. Some of that stuff is awful. I'm sure they are having fun but jeeze ... everything you need to do a nice job is readily available but here they are, gluing popsicle sticks together to make a machine. Maybe I should make kits. Then all we'd need to do is make an O2 act as the controller. We could duplicate Jim Clark's disastrous ocean voyage :P
GeneratriX wrote:
Do you mean, things like the CNC-Sable

That's a beautiful little piece.

And I wouldn't pay ten dollars for it. For actual use, it's shit.

1) Made out of aluminum. Aluminum is one-third as stiff as cast iron. That means that for the exact same force, it will deflect three times as much as a part made of a more suitable material.

2) All bolted construction. Same problem. Bolted joints are nowhere near as rigid as weldments or castings.

3) The ways suck. It's very difficult to impossible to get the preload you want on round ways. If the female portion had seals and hydraulic oil pumped in under pressure they would be hydrodynamic ways, extremely stiff and very cool. But they aren't. If they are just a female bushing then you can't get the fit you need and can't ever adjust them for wear. If they use small balls for rolling elements then they concentrate all the loads on a very small area and wear very quickly plus have almost no damping effect.

4) The table : how the hell are you going to mount anything to that thing ? Every heard of t-slots, guys ?

5) The spindle : a three-jaw chuck ? Are those people nuts ? Any cutter except for a drill will have a sideways component of force. The very first thing they teach a person in shop class is to never I mean never put any kind of end mill or other cutter into a drill chuck. That means NEVER !

We could continue but will refrain :)

The point is, here's a very nice-looking device built with no consideration for its intended application. None whatsoever. I like hobbyists - I am a damn hobbyist ! but jeeze ... can we learn a little about the basics before we go making stuff ? Or writing web browsers ?

Quote:
or maybe bigger and more expensive things?

I don't see the price in this little guy but the sign machines are not nearly as pretty except they have the basics correct. I also have a hunch that the sign machines are a lot cheaper and they come with a working control right out of the box. It's in Chinese, of course, but still .... here's a (terrible) shot of a portion of a sign. Words are about 2 cm tall, workpiece was 14" by 22" (roughly 36 x 60 cm). Bigger letters in other areas, this just gives an idea of the accuracy of small cutters even with a small, cheap but properly designed machine.

Attachment:
milled_words.jpg
milled_words.jpg [ 69.09 KiB | Viewed 474 times ]


If CNC-Sable is the competition, maybe I should go into the biz of hobby NC machines ..... their stuff is crap. Beautiful crap to look at but still crap.
GeneralTrix wrote:
...which is a real workhorse ...

Control, this is Qiqihaer 20. Can you give me a ground speed check, please ?
Attachment:
onethousandninehundredforty-two_knots.jpg
onethousandninehundredforty-two_knots.jpg [ 217.58 KiB | Viewed 669 times ]


Have to go home, it's getting late here but General ... do you have any foundries available ? Can you run a table saw ? If not, a steel weldment is second-best ... you can make your own and beat the CNC-Sable price and quality.
GeneratriX wrote:
Now, talking seriously, what would be cool is some deskside-size milling machine with heavy duty capabilities... that's why I insist to look towards old milling machines instead of DIY routers... but since there is no real rush, I'm open to any good alternative/idea.

It's kind of two different requirements .... small parts need a high-speed spindle and fast, accurate table movements. Bridgeport work is more general-purpose, heavier cuts, not as accurate ... just different .....

Quote:
Bodor CNC Router

Yes, this is one of the places that makes the routers that little sign shops use. They also make little laser engravers. They are not pretty like the CNC-Sable but the design is correct and the prices are reasonable. Too bad about your import problem ....

Quote:
Around the '60's / '70's there was some generation of argentinean milling machines, fully manual and with 3D capabilities, enough dependable to be in almost every single workshop toolmaker and enough good to be still now operating with no more problems than an occasional change of ball bearings.

What is wrong with such approach?

Nothing, except that it's kind of hard to put on top of your desk :)

Quote:
hamei wrote:
... do you have any foundries available ? Can you run a table saw ?

Yes, I own both things and I can use them, what is your idea?

If you can't beat City Hall, then play their game :) Make it in Argentina. There's nothing so special about those little machines that you can't build nice ones. And the competition sucks. So .... we don't all have to be "knowledge workers" toiling in the fields so that Google can know every single thing about our previously-private lives.

PM, general :D