josehill wrote: Aren't you a little early to be installing Server 2003? It isn't EOL'd until July!
It was either that or move to the dog house
he said a girl named Patches was found ...
josehill wrote: Aren't you a little early to be installing Server 2003? It isn't EOL'd until July!
foetz wrote:vishnu wrote: We had hundreds of the 24" SGI and Sun monitors at work back in the day ... We recycled the whole lot of 'em ...
terrible, i'd be only too glad to take them all
hoosyny wrote: The ATEN Firewire is not compatible, or faulty ?
The truth is that I do not care too much about the Firewire card because I was reading that IRIX support for Firewire is not perfect and complete anyway.
TeamBlackFox wrote: I'm looking to keep it as a silent 24/7 system.
ivelegacy wrote: i do not like OpenOffice, and i need a Word application
Trippynet wrote: It's possible to get full 100Mb networking with the Indigo2, but then you need the GIO expansion card and these are a lot more expensive (and rare).
TeamBlackFox wrote:josehill wrote: I love "interface responsiveness." Hit the return key or click on something on a reasonable IRIX machine, and the machine feels like it immediately starts doing what you asked it to do.
Indeed this feels the case on GaNoU/Leenux and used to be on FreeBSD, until I switched to i3wm on FreeBSD.
TeamBlackFox wrote: AbiWord is decently compatible with MS Word.
jan-jaap wrote: I have to pay €0,23 per kWh.
TeamBlackFox wrote: ... we paid $400 this month to Virginia Dickhole Power Co.
vishnu wrote: I think the first thing to do would be to check the installed software and remove any CADduo driver(s) you see there...
foetz wrote: ... a good machine is much more than just the peak performance of some of the components ...
foetz wrote: most programs reach their peak at some point i.e. the ideal mix of features, speed and usability. after that from a developer's perspective whatever you do you can only make it worse. sgi did a great job in that regard by switching to the quarterly 6.5.x updates; only adding or correcting what actually makes sense. only very few companies have ever accomplished that. under those circumstances the user actually benefits from newer machines but as i said that's very rare unfortunately.
vishnu wrote: vishnu's jailbait avatar! We need a handcuffed smiley...
Kumba wrote: The wheels screech like the tortured cries of a hundred suffering children, though.
ivelegacy wrote: guys i do not want OpenOffice, i want Word Perfect, and i like to know about it
TeamBlackFox wrote: Still looking, I need quieter fans than the stock ones.
TeamBlackFox wrote: If you're a Gentoo MIPS developer, why not use a Gentoo box with remote X to pull a recent Libreoffice or Apache OpenOffice copy over.
vishnu wrote: I'm in Minnesota, I couldn't keep this place warm in the winter if I had a freakin' tokamak in my basement...
foetz wrote: if i got that right TeamBlackFox suggested using an office on gentoo and just using the sgi for x.
vishnu wrote: XSgi is missing the RANDR extention. Been meaning to look into that for a while now, anyone know where sgi keeps the source code for their version of X?
TeamBlackFox wrote: ... browsing the internet from Sakuya or Alice isn't really a priority. Just have my FreeBSD or NetBSD boxes download it onto an NFSv3 share ...
Trekiej wrote: Is there a bounty system here?
vishnu wrote: There's got to be an open source Open Document reader somewhere that we can get to run under Irix, yes/no?
ivelegacy wrote: also X11 is working ONLY on Impact/SR video board, the V6 is not supported
btw, i am fine with WP-v6, here it is a screenshot,
it is running on SGI/Impact, i have exported the display to quartX11 on macOSX in order to take a snapshot;
smj wrote: Maya can probably spread back-end rendering jobs across multiple machines - again, I'm not a Maya user, but it seems likely. But MPI won't let you automatically parallelize and distribute the front-end GUI application at runtime.
uunix wrote: An employee of SGI wrote a 5 or 6 part blog on the demise of SGI and I'm sure it was the section 'CRAP SUPPLIERS'..
foetz wrote: why me?
VenomousPinecone wrote: Nope, just always trying to play with something new.
commodorejohn wrote: All version-control software is shit.
smj wrote:foetz wrote: now that's a stock start
Fixed that for you.
surrealdeal wrote: For what you are colloquially referring to as IRIX, is, actually, GNU/IRIX ; or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU + IRIX.
Pontus wrote: Come on hamei. Give us some meat on the bone, why does it suck?
guardian452 wrote: hmmm, slight addition:
50% have a Windows PC desktop or laptop
58% have a Mac desktop or laptop
5% have a Unix or Linux computer
Curious how many of those 8% are virtual machine vs. dual-boot or boot camp ?
But this survey is also from 5 years ago... when I was still a student.
uunix wrote: ... both of which sound like a harrier jump jet all the time, which I would never want to work next to.
smj wrote: If you're looking for a general rule - avoid the 1U formfactor if you want to escape the noise.
uunix wrote: If you have no allegiance to a football team in the UK, can I please ask you spare a positive thought for my little team ...
TeamBlackFox wrote: ... preferably less than $200 USD.