hello,
seems like it's not the correct version for 4.8.
seems like it's not the correct version for 4.8.
The collected works of foetz - Page 2
hello,
nice to hear it worked.
i didn't respect special functions and some wouldn't compile so you might miss the one or the other.
but it's made with mipspro so i guess the stuff that works works quite well
nice to hear it worked.
i didn't respect special functions and some wouldn't compile so you might miss the one or the other.
but it's made with mipspro so i guess the stuff that works works quite well
_________________
r-a-c.de
wow, you guys are fast.
upped it just a few hours ago
upped it just a few hours ago
_________________
r-a-c.de
hello,
modo is a modeler only!
this is why it's so cheap
modo is a modeler only!
this is why it's so cheap
r-a-c.de
choza wrote: ohhh i see
hehe my fault
this means why im only an apprentice at all
no problem.
happens to the best of us
r-a-c.de
shrek wrote:
Well my work depended on it and I work for myself so I regular work through the weekends
Though I've got no time atm to make nice tardist of everything
BTW, is anyone familiar with "sprocsp" errors with PHP when you are using libraries compiled with MIPSPro's "-apo" flag? I've had quite a few of them and I have no idea how to resolve them aside from just removing the -apo flag during build of the library... (it happend to MySQL if I remember correctly and to the latest GD (graphics library).
Though I've got no time atm to make nice tardist of everything
BTW, is anyone familiar with "sprocsp" errors with PHP when you are using libraries compiled with MIPSPro's "-apo" flag? I've had quite a few of them and I have no idea how to resolve them aside from just removing the -apo flag during build of the library... (it happend to MySQL if I remember correctly and to the latest GD (graphics library).
also got -apo errors. but only when using php as a plugin/lib.
same with apache2.
_________________
r-a-c.de
hello,
$500 for a dm10?? by far cheaper as i thought!!
where do you get this price?
$500 for a dm10?? by far cheaper as i thought!!
where do you get this price?
r-a-c.de
hello,
open swmgr and choose:
- unmark all.
- select recommended upgrades.
open swmgr and choose:
- unmark all.
- select recommended upgrades.
r-a-c.de
seems like they phased out many traditional unices...
r-a-c.de
yeah
NEKO S.W.A.T.
i wanna join!
NEKO S.W.A.T.
i wanna join!
r-a-c.de
there's no hard or easy installation.
you just have to know how to do it
you just have to know how to do it
r-a-c.de
dexter1 wrote: Not that we have time to actually DO this, but then, what's life without a wishlist...
Garlic Molecular Viewer and Editor Version 1.4 http://garlic.mefos.hr/garlic/index.html
in my folder. irix64 version is highly optimized.
r-a-c.de
hamei wrote:foetz wrote: n my folder. irix64 version is highly optimized.
nekonoko - I think we need a new category for this user class - "gods of porting" or something, maybe. People who do work like dexter1 and foetz and squeen and all the others need something a little extra by their usernames - a big gold star, red text, dunno what. Something, tho.
thanks, foetz.
r-a-c.de
photoshop runs with 6.5.26.
displays an error cause of the postscript issue but works fine.
just text can't be used.
displays an error cause of the postscript issue but works fine.
just text can't be used.
_________________
r-a-c.de
mefull wrote:
Thaidog wrote:
I keep seeing adobe photoshop (like 3 or 4) and illustrator software for IRIX on ebay... i'm wondering if these programs will run on the latest hardware like the Octane 2? Is this software 64bit or 32?
The problem with buying these on ebay is that you won't be able to get a licence from Adobe to install these on your machine. As far as I know Adobe does not support either program on Irix anymore.
If you really want to run those you need to buy a machine with it already installed.
Maybe someone else on this list knows a contact at Adobe to get a new licence?
adobe won't sell new lics.
_________________
r-a-c.de
old version of kpt should be around somewhere...
_________________
r-a-c.de
unixmuseum wrote:
foetz wrote:
old version of kpt should be around somewhere...
Thanks! I was more looking for file format type of plugins, like png... It appears thatplugins need to be compiled on IRIX in order for them to work...
sure, binary plugs are like libs or bins.
_________________
r-a-c.de
Quote:
Who buys UNIX workstations anymore?
quality loving people and those who wanna get work done
_________________
r-a-c.de
r-a-c.de
Diego wrote:zizban wrote: Linux has lot of software repositories, some of them much smarter than tardist so I don't expect SGI to do anything about that.
...Are you sure?
And why every time I try to use seriously Linux in my office it gets me screwed with a lot of wrong-feels about his whole nature?
I don't think (REALLY) that the software packaging used by RedHat (RPM), Debian, or SlackWare can be better than thoses from IRIX at all... sorry, I can't share your opinion there...
i second that. irix' inst format is the best i've ever worked with by far.
r-a-c.de
very good report, tom
r-a-c.de
R-ten-K wrote:
foetz wrote:
R-ten-K wrote:
foetz wrote:
so if the altix can get somewhere near the gene with 1/3 cpu count it's the better machine.
Nope....
why?
Because Columbia will not be anywhere near what the BlueGene/L at LLNL offers flop wise, so that was a moot point.
no doubt, gene has the max peak but nobody denied that.
anyhow it does not mean that the gene is the 'best' machine.
_________________
r-a-c.de
should we bet?
how about some quotes?
how about some quotes?
_________________
r-a-c.de
well, here it is
maybe one of the most wanted contribs for now.
it's in beta and i ask the nekoware gurus to review it. after that it can be moved to current.
ftp://ftp.nekochan.net/pub/downloads/Nekoware/beta/neko_firefox-104.tardist
maybe one of the most wanted contribs for now.
it's in beta and i ask the nekoware gurus to review it. after that it can be moved to current.
ftp://ftp.nekochan.net/pub/downloads/Nekoware/beta/neko_firefox-104.tardist
_________________
r-a-c.de
squeen wrote:
Thanks foetz. A
very
welcome addition!
I'll give it a go shortly. I'm still trying to track down what all pushed my neko_mozilla unstable.
I'll give it a go shortly. I'm still trying to track down what all pushed my neko_mozilla unstable.
try the 1.8b1
_________________
r-a-c.de
well, it's not a real static build. i just included the needed libs right into the main folder.
the firefox startup script takes external ones first so you won't get into trouble regarding
double installations.
further i know that i broke some nekoware rules and i told steve why. i don't want (can't) to explain this
deeper. i just ask you to respect it. it's the best i can do for now.
anyway i think we can enjoy a stable and fast neko-customized browser with a neat sized tardist.
the firefox startup script takes external ones first so you won't get into trouble regarding
double installations.
further i know that i broke some nekoware rules and i told steve why. i don't want (can't) to explain this
deeper. i just ask you to respect it. it's the best i can do for now.
anyway i think we can enjoy a stable and fast neko-customized browser with a neat sized tardist.
_________________
r-a-c.de
ZoontF wrote: Seems to me the static/shared thing was discussed before in another thread. There was a vote, too, right? I don't think the outcome of the vote made it clear cut what we should do.
Shared means we each have to install a buncha libs in order to run one app we want, getting into the typical dependency hell that drives me nuts on Linux.
Static means we have bloat on machines that we would probably prefer to avoid bloat on. I know that I like to keep my machine running as lean as possible.
as i said it's NOT a static build. the only thing i did is to include the required libs (just about 2,5mb)
so all should be fine.
phrosty-boi wrote: sorry but i don't want to sound like a negative nancy, but how come its a 34 meg download?
for windoze it's not even 10, i'm just interested as to what makes up all the extra 20 or so meg, is it to do with dependencies by any chance or just how these tardist files work?
first the tardist format does not have the best compression and second the file size differs
between the platforms. i.e. the same code compiled could be let's say 10mb on a mac and
8mb on a x86.
if you want a smaller package grab my independant builds.
Also, I like to add that this (SlimDesktop) is only a work that I'm making for myself, and releasing just in case that anyone else could find it useful, so, does not needs any kind of justifications if people founds it unuseful or repetitive... only that by those days your Mozilla/FireFox builds were only binaries, so, not tardists availables for lazy people like me.
Anyway, if you have plains to make tardist builds, then I'll remove the FireFox dist files from my SlimDesktop to save space for something else not available on NekoWare by now. What do you think?
sorry, i won't release non-nekoware tardists of mozilla-family apps in the near future.
So, my votes are: every NekoWare must be released as a tardist file!
the nekoware IS all tardist.
Diego wrote:foetz wrote: the nekoware IS all tardist.
Sorry; then I've referred more properly to those "FoetzWare" days, where the whole Mozilla's family was always in binary format, and never in tardist... anyway, I don't know if you are even releasing non-tardist versions as in the past.
why do you think so? i just stopped the weekly cvs builds cause of 3 nasty bugs the mozilla
guys didn't solve so far.
as soon as it's done there will be as much builds as there were in the past
edefault wrote: btw., what´s the difference between the builds from foetz´ contrib dir and the newkoware build? Icons?
Walther
nearly nothing. i just rebuild the app using /usr/nekoware as prefix and add the needed deps to
the tardist. the neko_firefox also got nekochan as the default homepage and a few things like that.
the app itself is the same. if you just wanna have the current version grab my tar.bz2 builds as always...
jimmer wrote:
Hi all,
This is the first public release of my CD Writer applet. It wraps mkisofs and cdrecord in a SGI Motif panel.
Read the README, learn the various DISCLAIMERS off by heart and get it here: http://www.sillypages.org/sgi/
Enjoy!
Avi
PS. Please make the effort to REPORT BUGS ! No bug reports, no fixes.
This is the first public release of my CD Writer applet. It wraps mkisofs and cdrecord in a SGI Motif panel.
Read the README, learn the various DISCLAIMERS off by heart and get it here: http://www.sillypages.org/sgi/
Enjoy!
Avi
PS. Please make the effort to REPORT BUGS ! No bug reports, no fixes.
REALLY COOL
_________________
r-a-c.de
Diego wrote:foetz wrote: why do you think so? i just stopped the weekly cvs builds cause of 3 nasty bugs the mozilla
guys didn't solve so far.
as soon as it's done there will be as much builds as there were in the past
Sorry Foetz; my excuses for these missunderstanding, I've was just too bussy on my own things here on latest weeks, not awared at all about this.
Then you'll release again binaries after solved those three bugs by the Mozilla's team, right?
sure, but i'm up to date with the releases. the bug just prevents me from building the weekly
cvs versions.
just have a look into my folder.
Diego wrote:foetz wrote: sure, but i'm up to date with the releases. the bug just prevents me from building the weekly
cvs versions.
just have a look into my folder.
This is cool; I'll wait anyway for the next tardist,
this might be ff1.1 but i can't promise.
since I'm up to date by now. Also, I have arranged the new release (V0.06) of SlimDesktop to upload soon to the FTP account of Neko
great!
; and starting with this release in advance the Mozilla FireFox tardist is not included anymore on my combined package. So, I'll let the whole task for you!
hehe
Thanks in advance by your excellent work!
likewise! it's always nice to have a coder in the neighbourhood
Diego wrote: BTW: What do you think about my issue with the build of YafRay V0.07? Seems pretty weird...
Compiling YafRay V0.0.7 On MIPSPRO
looks like there's an -L entry missing in the install routine.
Diego wrote:foetz wrote:Diego wrote: BTW: What do you think about my issue with the build of YafRay V0.07? Seems pretty weird...
Compiling YafRay V0.0.7 On MIPSPRO
looks like there's an -L entry missing in the install routine.
Weird, I've browsed the Makefile, and ./configure was adding correctly a line for -lyafraycore. But regardles of this, I've noticed that was linked against some MIPS3 standard libraries instead of MIPS4. I'll check deeper later. Thanks by your point of view!
no problem, but i haven't done much
Diego wrote:foetz wrote: no problem, but i haven't done much
Oh, I can't say by now what was wrong with YafRay there, but I'll check once backuped those 18Gigs that I need to stock now...
Thanks in anyway; sorry by this little "steal" of your thread!
no prob.
Salutti!
pizza
hi,
tried it, too.
it's a real pain. seems like the guys over there are some sort of 'made with and for linux'
hardcoding g++ in some makefiles is crap anyway. no matter which os.
tried it, too.
it's a real pain. seems like the guys over there are some sort of 'made with and for linux'
hardcoding g++ in some makefiles is crap anyway. no matter which os.
stuart wrote: I'm going to try reinstalling eoe.sw.base, which provides /sbin/sulogin...
maybe your password or the shadow file is corrupted?
r-a-c.de