The collected works of foetz - Page 20

  • wget.bz2
  • tcltk_805.tar.bz2
  • sed.bz2
  • readline_4.tar.bz2
  • patch.bz2
  • ntp_412.tar.bz2
  • libxml_174.tar.bz2
  • libxml2_2212.tar.bz2
  • libisnan.tar.bz2
  • libiconv_17.tar.bz2
  • curl_76.tar.bz2

libisnan is a replacement for isnan which irix4 doesn't have. static lib, ucode lib and prototype included. not stripped.
r-a-c.de
5.3
  • ntp_412.tardist
r-a-c.de
vishnu wrote: Can you get a backtrace with dbx?

sure, i posted it already :D
r-a-c.de
haha, poor armanox :P

but since we're on it already why messing with c++ at all?

Code: Select all

PROGRAM test
INTEGER i = 2

DO 10 i = 0, 1
print *, i
10      continue

print *, i
END
r-a-c.de
that's the idea :-)

it should give a nice foundation for quite a number of things. be it freeware or your own stuff. in fact due to curl and libxml it's even possible to make quite a "modern", internet savvy program
r-a-c.de
yeah the trace could be better and the stripped part is likely from irix
r-a-c.de
vishnu wrote: I don't know where you find the time foezt but this is awesome! How many people do you have on your staff anyway...? 8-)

:P

it doesn't take that long. while other people might watch some silly talent show i rather take the compiler for a walk :D
r-a-c.de
5.3
  • libstrptime.tar.bz2

this is a substitute for strptime() that's not available on 5.3. as usual static, shared and ucode lib included as well as the prototype and not stripped
r-a-c.de
  • libstrptime.tar.bz2
  • openssl_097m.tar.bz2
  • perl500504.tar.bz2
  • curl_76_ssl.tar.bz2

libstrptime is a substitute for strptime() that's not available on 4. as usual static and ucode lib included as well as the prototype and not stripped.
when using the original mips c on irix4 it complains about a specific prototype on line 1400 in ssl.h. if you should encounter that just comment that line out
r-a-c.de
indigo2, r4400

why? because it gives you the opportunity to run anything from 4.0.5 to 6.5.22. the indy might be able to do the same but it's too weak and given the prices of used indigo2s the cost factor shouldn't matter
r-a-c.de
hmm techpubs for 5.3 say:

The nonsubnetted netmask for a Class B address (in hexadecimal) would be 0xffff0000
r-a-c.de
there're 2 common ways to customize the toolchest. you either edit the system wide one (/usr/lib/X11/system.chestrc) or create a .chestrc file in your home with your additions
r-a-c.de
indeed that's good news :D
grabbed simh already and will give it a try ...
r-a-c.de
seems this works in a limited way. if the gateway is on the same net as the local ip then a wider netmask works, too. otherwise it is as described above
r-a-c.de
5.3
  • openssl_097m.tardist
  • perl_500504.tardist
  • sylpheed_066.tardist
  • svn_155.tardist
  • aprutil_0912.tardist
  • apr_0912.tardist

also some of the old ones rebuilt thanks to some changes patch 1068 applies
r-a-c.de
maybe because linux is what they run these days?
r-a-c.de
hamei wrote: An O350 should be much more responsive than an old Z-Pro with a pair of Pentium Pro's, but it isn't :(

if that's the case then you have the worst config possible or the thing is simply broken :P
r-a-c.de
congrats, that's pretty much as much irix as you can get :D
r-a-c.de
according to the digital unix 4.0d docs not using the raw device is correct

Code: Select all

mount -rd -t cdfs -o rrip /dev/rz4c /usr/share/doclib/online


does the cdrom work otherwise? i mean you're sure the gear is fine?
r-a-c.de
yetanother**ixuser wrote: downgraded to digital unix 3.0F. it seems that cdfs support is not included in the standard dgux kernel

erm, wait. are you having that problem with dg/ux or digital unix?
r-a-c.de
josehill wrote: To be fair, though, I have been amazed by the number of developers (on any platform) who really don't understand parallelization at all.

on some days i could even rephrase that to:
"I have been amazed by the number of developers (on any platform) who really don't understand."

:P
r-a-c.de
that's a neat idea. switzerland has always been a bit more flexible and open compared to other countries :-)
r-a-c.de
  • curl_77.tar.bz2
  • apr_0912.tar.bz2
  • aprutil_0912.tar.bz2
  • svn_155.tar.bz2

the previous curl 7.6 had issues with ssl. this one is fine across the board so i deleted the others in favor of this one.
svn crashed sometimes but i'm not sure if that was because i was using it inside a chroot so use at your own risk :P
r-a-c.de
5.3
  • xchat_143-gcc.tardist

the last version that didn't make heavy use of posix regex and only a gcc build. it was too gcc'ed for the mips c :P
r-a-c.de
hamei wrote: You yourself have noticed that the O350 will block you out for periods of time

which turned out to be a disk issue (and was no issue for normal operation anyway). but even with the bad disk it ran like hell. compared to a pentium pro they're worlds apart in absolutely every aspect.

as for smp, i used a 16 cpu origin 2000 for pretty much all of the 6.5 packages i provided over the years and i can assure you that multiple cpus and shared memory, especially the way sgi did it, does pay off :D
r-a-c.de
hehe, of course smp only works if your proggy supports it. but i've taken that for granted given that this thread is about that very subject :P
r-a-c.de
hamei wrote: When multi-core chips became the norm I was all excited that application programmers would finally have to figure out smp.

Alas, I was wrong :(

i'm afraid so. the number of daily use programs that can utilize more than one cpu or core is pretty much zero. one of the main reasons why multi-core cpus for the consumer market are a joke
r-a-c.de
yeah that cheap yosemite monitor is how a browser process tree could be made better. but only at first sight because that still won't speed up single pages but only adds some failsafe and you can load pages in parallel each page taking one cpu ... whoever does load multiple pages at the same time :P

what i'd like to have is all cpus working on the same page because otherwise you have no speedup
r-a-c.de
guardian452 wrote: Multi-core CPUs are very important for games. And a lot of games run in the browser nowadays. Me and the wife like to play shadowgun * and while we both use the dedicated mac and windows programs respectively, I would say 75% of the players play through facebook (the browser). Why? Well, I don't have a facebook but I'm guessing it (a) posts your scores and ranking to your friends and (b) you don't have to create a seperate account. (Shadowgun tells you what system each player is using in the rankings after each match)

* She says I'm too good at Unreal since I grew up with it (playing since the first one came out) and refuses to play with me anymore :lol:

I think the gaming advantage is lost with more than 4 cores but it most game engines make good utilization of two or three. I think a lot of people here still think a web-based game can't be a full-on 3D shooter, but that's not true anymore. I think it's silly but there sure are a lot of gamers there.

Another place lots of CPU chutzpah is needed in the browser is video streaming. I like NHL gamecenter live. There is an xbox app but they do regional blackouts a lot so of course you will need a "real computer" that can log on to a VPN and it doesn't seem worth it to try and set that up with the xbox. Unlike watching a film, cartoon, or even most other sports example football if your hockey stream drops a few frames and switches quality (i.e. down to 720@30fps) you WILL notice it... the puck disappears. :D

haha okay, for members of the "worst resources wasters" list you can never have enough of whatever :P

If you have a single page with a flash or js all of that is separate multithreaded processes.

so js runs on one cpu and the page rendering on another?

hamei wrote: No-Script. I guess I am extreme but so sick of crap Javascript that in general, it's turned off entirely. Once in a while I'll want something bad enough to turn it on temporarily but mostly, if it uses javascript, screw it. Go somewhere else.

exactly the same here :D
r-a-c.de
welcome atriad :-)

are you looking for something specific or just wanna have an sgi period? :D
r-a-c.de
pentium wrote: I'd kill to see what is on that hard drive.

maybe it's blank :P
r-a-c.de
guardian452 wrote: Modern websites may be in sad state of affairs but fireflopping around in them is not going to make you any happier.

sadly it doesn't make one happier with any browser on any machine. bloated crap is bloated crap no matter from where and how you look at it :P

doesn't mean of course that the mozilla stuff couldn't be more suited to today's hardware. for years now every cheap supermarket brand peecee comes with a multicore chip but the vast majority of typical home user stuff i've seen doesn't make use of them. or at least not in a way that'd make a proper difference
r-a-c.de
pentium wrote:
foetz wrote:
pentium wrote: I'd kill to see what is on that hard drive.

maybe it's blank :P


Don't poke at my hopes like that. :(

... or maybe there's an old alias installed from the coff times with all the inhouse plugins from ilm :D

better? :D
r-a-c.de
atriad wrote: 320s and a 540 ... I'd be most interested in putting some kind of Linux on it.

that'd make it just a pc with linux. not much sgi in there except for the logo on the case.
if you're interested in the sgi experience it has to be irix :D
r-a-c.de
5.3
  • gimp_125.tardist
  • tiff_382.tardist

tiff is without c++ support for obvious reasons :P
r-a-c.de
  • curl_79.tar.bz2

yeah sorry yet another one :P
previous versions don't support CURLOPT_COOKIEJAR so if you need to store cookies take this one :-)
r-a-c.de
an rx2600 runs hpux 11.23 or later. if you want linux get a peecee :P
r-a-c.de
hamei wrote:
foetz wrote: if you want linux get a peecee :P

Or an Altix or a Prism, which might be more fun ...

sadly yes
r-a-c.de
hamei wrote: I have no idea why there isn't more violence in commerce today ...

:P

maybe there should be :D
r-a-c.de
  • pcre_44.tar.bz2

for the regex fans
r-a-c.de