josehill wrote:
foetz wrote:
josehill wrote:
Of course, it has some serious gaps in a few areas like USB
who cares? oh and there are usb keyboards and mice
I do, a little bit.
It would be nice to be able to buy a common USB2 card, slap it into
any
PCI SGI box (like an O2, or even an O2K, not just the more recent machines), and then connect one or two $250 500 GB USB2 drives and have them work without having to sacrifice a goat first, rather than pay the same amount for a 73 GB SCA drive.
sure but that's not what the typical sgi customer cares about and i'm happy about this.
Quote:
I prefer using SCSI drives for servers and critical applications, but for certain uses, it would be great to have a reasonable,
cheap
USB storage option, especially on older hardware.
foetz wrote:
josehill wrote:
, Firewire
dm10.
Sure, but poking around in other Nekochan threads reveals caveats about one chipset or another, things that work on Tezro or Fuel but are more, um, complex on other systems, and so on. No doubt it's great for some, but Firewire is one of those things that should "just work."
so how many of the posters tried the 'real' dm10?
Quote:
foetz wrote:
josehill wrote:
, the desktop GUI
what's wrong with the dekstop? it's perfect! productivity oriented, very fast, slim, not overloaded, stable ... it's just not a toy like desktop today. but exactly this is one of the major pros at least for me.
I agree! (Well, maybe I'd only say it's "really, really great!", not "perfect!"
)
okay
Quote:
I'm not talking about adding all sorts of wizzy effects or bubblegum and eye candy, but really just some tiny, gradual improvements in functionality. To be clear, I am also referring to the entire desktop application environment, not just 4dwm. In many ways, KDE and Gnome still have not reached the level of functionality and behavioral consistency that IRIX 6.5 had in 1998. Unfortunately, as IRIX desktop development efforts declined, some of the beautifully integrated functions have been replaced by less elegant (but perhaps more complete) open source solutions (for example, Impressario vs CUPS). If IRIX desktop development had continued, I could imagine all sorts of
refinements
for dragging-and-dropping between desktop applications, as well as many other things that might be useful. A moot point, however, since the desktop certainly isn't getting any more refinements!
By the way, I really wasn't complaining about IRIX. The quality of the IRIX Interactive Desktop is the main reason why my staff and I continue to use IRIX desktops as our preferred frontend to our Linux and Solaris systems!
nice