uunix wrote: Well, I'm giving up on them now, they strike me that they will be continuously error some. Ethernet now works, SCSI doesn't.
ClassicHasClass wrote: What do you mean, a spaceball?
tomvos wrote: Well, I'm a little late, but nevertheless: Welcome. Enjoy the ride, there are lot of curiosities, amenities, stupidities ... even some profanities and very little modernities.
Code: Select all
Site Builder Workshop CD-ROM. All WorldWide Live! attendees will receive two CD-ROMs containing all the tools and information they need to begin building compelling, interactive ActiveX sites immediately, including the Site Builder Workshop. This comprehensive CD-ROM includes the ActiveX Controls Gallery, a collection of third-party ActiveX Controls including technologies from Adobe, Macromedia, Progressive Networks and VDOnet as well as other tools and technologies.
josehill wrote:vishnu wrote: I don't know what Microsoft's policy on redistribution of those CDROMs was, my guess, since they were trying to reach as large an audience as possible, would be that they didn't care. Perhaps miod would be so kind as to look at the terms and conditions if he can still read the disk, and report back...
Part of the reason that we draw a pretty hard line is that we really don't have the time or inclination to referee software licenses or to make guesses about the thoughts of corporate attorneys.
TeamBlackFox wrote: am indeed very jealous of your good fortune Vishnu. How's that thing on noise? Also, with the 1GHz Tezro you can't have DCD. I'd rather have a quad 800MHz Tezro if I found one.
Oskar45 wrote: Hi, GrandpaQuite OT now - but as I have this unfortunate habit of not to get rid of any books I ever purchased, I still have quite a few from the *early 60's* around...
hamei wrote: I don't think it's true but the story is, they put the shrimp in a pan without water for some time ... half hour ? an hour ? and the shrimp get really thirsty. Then they pour the shrimp into a low pan of what we call white wine (basically turpentine with an alcohol content around 80 to 90 proof). The thirsty shirmps shlurp shlurp shlurp up all the alcohol, then they pour them into a bowl with some sauce. Viola, here's your dish, 150 little shrimps staggering around.
If the sauce is good they are pretty tasty. With a little practice you cna shell them in your mouth in one swift schlurp, then spit out the shell onto the table. Next !
For those with aquariums, you know the cherry red shrimp ? The ones that the fish sellers describe as "bred in Taiwan" ? The ones you thought were designed to be cute little aquarium pets ? There's a Taiwan dish, "cherry red shrimp" which is one of those rice-in-a-hot-iron-pot things. Yup. Comes with a raw egg, some veggies, and a bowl of cherry red shrimp. Pour into the rice and stir like heck. They were bred in Taiwan, yes, but I don't think for the aquarium trade.
Fried little tiny frogs are pretty good, too. Crunchy. Subtle flavoring, reminiscent of a pond, nice grass, and an evening ribbetting the ladies. It helps to be kind of drunk when you eat them.
But there's a restaraunt down the street I'm saving for when smj comes over. They have the best spicy bee larvae in this part of zhejiang. Kind of expensive but really good. SMJ deserves the best
Okay, here's a dish you cowards can actually try at home. Next time you barbecue, get some tiger shrimp. Leave the shells on. Best to get them live so you can make them go without food for a day to clean out their pooper but I'm not sure you can get that back there in the free world ? Anyway, take the shrimps in their shells and find a tinfoil pan a couple inches deep. Put the shrimps in the pan and bury them in salt. Yes, bury. Fill the pan up to cover the tops of the pile of shrimp. I bet some added seasonings would make it even better. Put the pan on the barby like you were carburizing some 8620 in a cyanide bath. Don't get it as hot though. You're on your own for figuring out how long it takes to cook - we're always kind of disabled by this step of the process, but you should be able to trial and error it out. Maybe five minutes ? Pull them hummers off the fire, dig around in the salt to find them, shell and eat. So easy even I can do it. And yummy. Almost as good as the drunk ones
foetz wrote: why not?
guardian452 wrote: yup, looks like the same people in there as always
foetz wrote: you really found no compiler that did it nor could change a few bits here and there to make it work?
Code: Select all
make widgetfr.o
c++ -DPACKAGE=\"widget\" -DVERSION=\"0.10\" -DHAVE_DIRENT_H=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -I. -I. -I./.. -I./../afx -g -O2 -Wall -c widgetfr.C
widgetfr.C: In member function 'void COptionMenuWidgetExtended::Create(CWidget*)':
widgetfr.C:61:63: error: conversion from 'int' to 'CWidgetAttach' is ambiguous
widget.h:220:2: note: candidates are: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(void*)
widget.h:218:2: note: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(long int)
widgetfr.C:64:69: error: conversion from 'int' to 'CWidgetAttach' is ambiguous
widget.h:220:2: note: candidates are: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(void*)
widget.h:218:2: note: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(long int)
widgetfr.C: In constructor 'CFileRequesterWidget::CFileRequesterWidget(const char*)':
widgetfr.C:88:6: error: 'void COptionMenuWidgetExtended::OnOptionActivate()' is private
widgetfr.C:131:35: error: within this context
widgetfr.C:131:35: error: no match for 'operator=' in '((CFileRequesterWidget*)this)->CFileRequesterWidget::m_ok = &COptionMenuWidgetExtended::OnOptionActivate'
widgetredirect.h:40:7: note: candidates are: void CActivateRedirect<Base, T>::operator=(T*) [with Base = CPushButtonWidget, T = CFileRequesterWidget]
widgetredirect.h:41:7: note: void CActivateRedirect<Base, T>::operator=(void (T::*)()) [with Base = CPushButtonWidget, T = CFileRequesterWidget]
widgetredirect.h:29:69: note: CActivateRedirect<CPushButtonWidget, CFileRequesterWidget>& CActivateRedirect<CPushButtonWidget, CFileRequesterWidget>::operator=(const CActivateRedirect<CPushButtonWidget, CFileRequesterWidget>&)
widgetfr.C:95:6: error: 'virtual void COptionMenuWidgetExtended::OnActivate()' is private
widgetfr.C:132:39: error: within this context
widgetfr.C:132:39: error: no match for 'operator=' in '((CFileRequesterWidget*)this)->CFileRequesterWidget::m_cancel = &COptionMenuWidgetExtended::OnActivate'
widgetredirect.h:40:7: note: candidates are: void CActivateRedirect<Base, T>::operator=(T*) [with Base = CPushButtonWidget, T = CFileRequesterWidget]
widgetredirect.h:41:7: note: void CActivateRedirect<Base, T>::operator=(void (T::*)()) [with Base = CPushButtonWidget, T = CFileRequesterWidget]
widgetredirect.h:29:69: note: CActivateRedirect<CPushButtonWidget, CFileRequesterWidget>& CActivateRedirect<CPushButtonWidget, CFileRequesterWidget>::operator=(const CActivateRedirect<CPushButtonWidget, CFileRequesterWidget>&)
widgetfr.C: In member function 'void CFileRequesterWidget::Create(CWidget*)':
widgetfr.C:157:21: error: conversion from 'int' to 'CWidgetAttach' is ambiguous
widget.h:220:2: note: candidates are: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(void*)
widget.h:218:2: note: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(long int)
widgetfr.C:158:66: error: conversion from 'int' to 'CWidgetAttach' is ambiguous
widget.h:220:2: note: candidates are: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(void*)
widget.h:218:2: note: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(long int)
widgetfr.C:160:65: error: conversion from 'int' to 'CWidgetAttach' is ambiguous
widget.h:220:2: note: candidates are: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(void*)
widget.h:218:2: note: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(long int)
widgetfr.C:164:10: error: conversion from 'int' to 'CWidgetAttach' is ambiguous
widget.h:220:2: note: candidates are: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(void*)
widget.h:218:2: note: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(long int)
widgetfr.C:167:67: error: conversion from 'int' to 'CWidgetAttach' is ambiguous
widget.h:220:2: note: candidates are: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(void*)
widget.h:218:2: note: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(long int)
widgetfr.C:179:68: error: conversion from 'int' to 'CWidgetAttach' is ambiguous
widget.h:220:2: note: candidates are: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(void*)
widget.h:218:2: note: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(long int)
widgetfr.C:184:66: error: conversion from 'int' to 'CWidgetAttach' is ambiguous
widget.h:220:2: note: candidates are: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(void*)
widget.h:218:2: note: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(long int)
widgetfr.C:190:71: error: conversion from 'int' to 'CWidgetAttach' is ambiguous
widget.h:220:2: note: candidates are: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(void*)
widget.h:218:2: note: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(long int)
widgetfr.C:192:68: error: conversion from 'int' to 'CWidgetAttach' is ambiguous
widget.h:220:2: note: candidates are: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(void*)
widget.h:218:2: note: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(long int)
widgetfr.C:197:63: error: conversion from 'int' to 'CWidgetAttach' is ambiguous
widget.h:220:2: note: candidates are: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(void*)
widget.h:218:2: note: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(long int)
widgetfr.C:198:67: error: conversion from 'int' to 'CWidgetAttach' is ambiguous
widget.h:220:2: note: candidates are: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(void*)
widget.h:218:2: note: CWidgetAttach::CWidgetAttach(long int)
make: *** [widgetfr.o] Error 1
foetz wrote: next stop: exceptions. disabled them by default of course but the nice little proggy is using them everywhere.
hamei wrote:foetz wrote:vishnu wrote: We had hundreds of the 24" SGI and Sun monitors at work back in the day ... We recycled the whole lot of 'em ...
terrible, i'd be only too glad to take them all
You must live on the ground floor ....