The collected works of bluecode - Page 2

As was mentioned in another thread in the IBM section I write systems software in assembler for IBM mainframes. Yeah they still exist, they still work great, they still cost tons of money and we still do everything in assembler. But business is getting tight, like everything else. I've worked on this platform all my career and I still love it.

_________________
Paint It Blue
That's kind of cool in a train-wreck sort of way. But it's also really offensive :lol:

_________________
Paint It Blue
mia wrote:
I would buy a Longsoon if I could find a 3A, I emailed tekmote, but they don't reply to their mail. And couldn't find a us reseller that has any.


Email Lemote directly. If Tekmote doesn't want to sell you something why argue with them about it? Their prices are outrageous anyway.
What are you going to run on it? Miod said OpenBSD isn't ready. And isn't OpenBSD the reason anybody would buy a Loongson? ;)

_________________
Paint It Blue
bgalakazam wrote:
I just wish all the RISC based workstations didn't die out 4 years ago. So what if Intel makes fast and powerful CPU's? With all the heavy OS's now it takes gigs just to boot up. Not to mention how sluggish your system becomes. I am using top-of-the-line CPU from 2006 and it's sluggish as hell.I am tired of the Intel monopoly on the market. And given there is little to no alternative if you want current processors it's very discouraging. I am still uneasy about ordering a Yeeloong due to the limited graphical settings. C'est la vie.


Plenty of people (especially on this board!) are running older RISC workstations and servers. What OS are heavy? Solaris still runs great on 10 year old hardware and you don't ever have to boot it except once in ten years. OpenBSD runs on tons of platforms and so do the other BSD. None of the BSD are heavy.

You're running a top of the line CPU from 2006 with what, Windows? What do you expect then? WinTel is about forcing you to upgrade to have tolerable performance. Dump the WinTel crap and run what you like. Who's holding a gun to your head? Loongson isn't the answer if you want a fast workstation. They make great little servers and ok development boxes but they're no Origin 350. But if people don't like WinTel and keep buying it, the arms race will never end. If you look around and ask you'll find something that meets your needs.

_________________
Paint It Blue
Back on topic, the boxes coming out of Lemote are good boxes and good values. I don't know how long they will last but I do know the engineering is holding up. I've kept mine going for a week straight building OpenBSD from source. It doesn't take a week, but I did the builds multiple times to see what the box was made of and afaiac it passed with flying colors. It didn't catch on fire or heat up my office and it doesn't give me a headache because it's nearly silent, and it doesn't break the bank because it uses almost no electricity. The little thing just goes and works. My experience with Chinese products has not been very good, especially not their hardware (as in screws, bolts, tools, etc.) but I am very happy with the quality and performance and price point of this Lemote box. I don't like laptops so I didn't buy one, but you could get opinions from people who did and see what they think also. Rather than generalizations even though they might be mostly correct (after all, they're generalizations! ) there are always exceptions. Anything that gives me a viable choice over WinTel is A Good Thing . I have mostly old Sun/SPARC hardware because of that and it is very nice to see something new being made that isn't Intel, isn't expected to run Windows, and is well built and priced fairly. I'm hoping to see more Lemote export hardware and more companies getting a variety of useful green hardware out there. This is an excellent start.

_________________
Paint It Blue
In the immortal words of Chico Escuela:

"In base-ball… Base-ball been berry, berry good to me! Thank you berry much. Thank you. Thank you berry much. Hane? Thank you, Hane.”

--
It had to be said.

_________________
Paint It Blue
Man you guys are spoiled. If I had an Alpha box it would be running VMS. I can't imagine having so much Alpha hardware around that I would ever be willing to abuse even one junker with Windows!

_________________
Paint It Blue
Now that UEFI is shipping and you're going to need permission from WinTel to run anything but Windows 8 on your brand new WinTel or WinARM box, this http://tech.slashdot.org/story/12/11/26/2016228/is-intel-planning-to-kill-enthusiast-pcs is nailing the coffin shut.

_________________
Paint It Blue
This was posted yesterday on the reg http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/26 ... c_preview/

Lemote is not sitting still. Lots of MIPS goodness ahead.

_________________
Paint It Blue
GL1zdA wrote:
UEFI <> Secure Boot and Secure Boot can be disabled on Intel boxes.


Maybe for now, but we can expect that to silently disappear. And even now it not trivial according to what the guy on Distrowatch said about his recent laptop buy.

"Don't be so gullible, McFly!" The handwriting is on the wall.

_________________
Paint It Blue
duck wrote:
I don't know shit about cars, but surely pre-DSG automatic transmissions is something to avoid like the plague. That is unless you happen to be a car fanatic or masochist, but I repeat myself.

Edit: DSG not DGS idiot.


What is DSG?

_________________
Paint It Blue
Thanks. I only buy manual transmission vehicles for that and other reasons.

_________________
Paint It Blue
jwp wrote:
They are planning on using these chips for servers and supercomputers too, then.


There are already servers and supercomputers built on their previous chips. These guys are serious and they're invested in this big-time.

jwp wrote:
Some pics of an older model are at: http://www.cyrius.com/debian/loongson/fulong/gallery.html

It looks like this came with a customized Debian install using a GNOME 2 desktop.


They have their own Debian-based distro and have been committing many patches to the Linux kernel. OpenBSD runs on it (of course!) and some people have said NetBSD and FreeBSD will run on it also.
The box pictured in your link is the previous version, the newer ones have the switches and jacks rearranged and a micro serial port on the front and they did away with the garish http://www.lemote.com lettering.

What is good in that last picture is it shows you the size of the box compared to a keyboard. That is a LOT of 800MHz MIPS III (64 bit) goodness in a tiny package. 512M of RAM, 160GB sata HD. Amazing little box. Later models also have a much smaller fan and don't use the copper plate. From what I read they decreased the power dissipation too and they now run about 12W.

_________________
Paint It Blue
That was a Saturday Night Live skit. If nothing else my post should bump your thread. Just trying to help ;-)

_________________
Paint It Blue
The Redbook here http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpapers/pdfs/redp4078.pdf talks about the audio adapter as in it says it exists, but it doesn't give any details how to use it.

Could you actually hear anything over the fan roar if you could get it to work? Maybe that's why there's no volume control ;)

Edit: I'm trying to find some relevant links. This isn't my area, but IBM *always* documents everything. It has to be somewhere.

http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/aix/v ... bility.htm

_________________
Paint It Blue
recondas wrote:
The current view at my office......


Nice Shovel, Recondas. Looks like a nice chop too. What all do you have there?

_________________
Paint It Blue
recondas wrote:
bluecodeQ wrote:
Does anybody have a simple recipe for converting a physical Windows install to a VirtualBox install? I'm trying to wean a certain family member off Windows co-dependence and I have a better idea what I want to do with that box anyway!


Why not approach the issue from the opposite direction and install the FOS operating system into a virtual machine on the existing, already running and licensed, copy of Windows?


"Friends don't let friends let Windows touch real hardware." It's just offensive. From a practical angle, Windows is hardly noted for stability and running anything under it is clearly A Bad Thing

recondas wrote:
Should eliminate most of the installation and licensing headaches - not to mention another page and a half of philosophical differences of opinion.


There are always certain people who like to play internet lawyers and create FUD. Lucky for me I have six lawyers in my family. I put the fudmeisters on ignore so I don't even see the idiotic comments after the first time. Good forum feature btw ;)

Sorry I didn't update this thread until now. I was going to use the capture utility somebody pointed me to in this thread but my installed system was big enough to just go over the biggest USB drive I have, so I couldn't actually try it. Disappointing. The system is now installed in VirtualBox where it doesn't have to take up much space or monopolize perfectly good crappy hardware. ;)

_________________
Paint It Blue
hamei wrote:
COBOL. Yup, there's ten people who use it.

And they all make big bucks.


Yeah we know it doesn't run on PCs. But there are a few dozen billion lines elsewhere. The guys writing it don't get paid much but it beats being a web developer.

_________________
Paint It Blue
silicium wrote:
Does anybody know APL? I heard once about it from a retired mechanical engineering business owner who used it before the age of graphics CAD.


I don't know it any more but I used to use it a little. You need a special keyboard for it so if you don't have one you get bored quickly. After I left the school where they were set up for I haven't seen it since. It's a pretty neat language, and very old. I understand actuaries still use it but I don't know who else does. I can see where it would be good for CAD since it has operators for matrix and vector operations but now pretty much anybody who needs that stuff just calls a library.

It's a nice language for doing quick math stuff sort of like Perl or Tcl are for writing quick utility scripts. APL makes Perl look verbose ;)

The idea of major financial systems running on APL is a bit scary.

_________________
Paint It Blue
thegoldbug wrote:
So in the end how did you complete the transfer/installation of the OS to the Virtual Box?????

I have an old PC with installed software that I would like on modern, faster hardware and I 'm lazy and don't want to do all the software reinstalls if I can just convert an image.


I just did a new install in vbox and then then used Windows "user settings and files transfer wizard". It is far from perfect but at least it got the email set up properly. Without passworss though, idiots! It doesn't appear to save almost any app, but the person this is for didn't need all the crap on the system anyway so now the system is smaller and has only what's needed.

For moving the system as is, the tool suggested by somebody in this thread is the first thing to try if you have a big enough USB drive. You won't know how much USB drive you need until you run it. The other thing I don't like about that tool is it doesn't seem to let you resize your system. For me the system was installed on a whole drive but needed actually only a small fraction of that. I was too busy and lazy to go burn a gparted live CD but that would have been another thing that probably could have helped me at least see if the tool worked. Since I want Windows totally out of existence I didn't have the patience to run down every possible alternative. For me the best alternative is no Windows at all and I'm working on this now. It was part of my plan all along. It will free up a box and get the person to learn UNIX as an end-user enough to do email, word processing etc. Now we are closer to that. Windows will soon be gone. Oh, happy, happy day!

The vbox forums have suggested approaches for doing this migration also. If you have a system you really want to preserve as is only you can decide if the stupid computer tricks and hoop jumping are worth it. For me this is one of the reasons I hate Windows so much. I've moved complete Linux installations around quickly and with no difficulty. Windows is painful from beginning to end. I just want it to GO AWAY!!!

_________________
Paint It Blue
PymbleSoftware wrote:
I ran into someone else today who also learnt RPG-II on the System/36. Without the correct form editor that was something that really did look like line noise and makes APL look verbose.R.


RPG isn't a computer language in the sense that most people think of computer languages. It's a positional Report Program Generator. IBM has come up with a few other systems like that, including DMS. Again, they're application generators , not proper languages. If IBM hadn't put out RPG about the same time they put out COBOL, it would probably have been accepted on the esolang website ;)

_________________
Paint It Blue
Does this mean you didn't floor-plan this in your new computer room!?

_________________
Paint It Blue
Lupin_the_3rd wrote:
Something I've been curious about, why the dearth of portable workstation class hardware? Try and find a portable laptop style computer that uses a 64 bit CPU, ECC memory, and SAS hard drives. They don't exist.


Did they ever exist? Sounds like you're talking about a server on wheels.

_________________
Paint It Blue
Google groups should DIE! It's one of the worst things ever to infest Usenet, even worse than AOL.

99% of spam and posts from idiots comes from google groups.

Use a Usenet newsreader and a free news server.

http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/

_________________
Paint It Blue
zmttoxics wrote:
But you are right, whats more fun here is that server has no video card. Instead, you have lights out which means a whole lot to me more than a gui on my servers. :)


It's not either/or. You get ALOM whether you run headless or not.

Sun boxes ROCK 8-)

_________________
Paint It Blue
hamei wrote:
I think Usenet went away for a few reasons :


Usenet didn't go away. There are numerous reliable free servers, there are plenty of pay servers, and there's FOSS software to run your own newsserver. I run my own news server and so do many people. It's the ultimate distributed network, there is no one place all the Usenet news lives.

There are gateways like gmane and google groups but they aren't Usenet, they're interfaces to Usenet.

Usenet is very much alive, despite more "modern" alternatives like this forum, etc. Usenet still has advantages like simple text interface, high performance, usual lack of moderation etc. Biggest advantage of all is it's free as in freedom. Nobody can censor Usenet, nobody can delete posts or stop people from sharing information. Usenet is one of the best things left about the internet.

_________________
Paint It Blue
This doesn't look like memory. Maybe one of the CPU modules got unseated during shipping? Unplug the box (even when off, they are all really on) and try reseating them. Plug back in and watch the power-on self tests on your serial console.

_________________
Paint It Blue
pentium wrote:
Is this REALLY only compatible with OS/400 and Z? Nothing from AIX? Not even from Linux?


I'd be very surprised if it works with Z. I've never seen any twinax or RS-232 stuff hooked up to any mainframe.

Usually when you say OS/400 and Z in the same sentence there is a problem :oops:

_________________
Paint It Blue
robespierre wrote:
ARM has never had an implementation that was performance-competitive in its own generation of CPUs, has it? I suppose that wasn't a criteria in the architecture design, given the focus on the embedded space.


I think that's it. ARM is about giving the most cycles per watt and now that everybody is past the point of realizing they spend much more on cooling or power than they do on hardware and software multiplied together, ARM is giving Intel some very serious heartburn in the data center.

robespierre wrote:
In some ways it is more "modern" than MIPS: no branch delay slots, POWER-like load-update and save/load-multiple, etc. But it wasn't until last week that they had a 64-bit processor!


Intel has been the market leader in toy machines and small rack gear from the beginning and their ISA is a disgrace. They take complexity for complexity' sake to high art. It's pretty clear all you need to sell a lot of hardware is to get Windows to run on it and then do some "creative" marketing.

You really could do most desktop computing with a 32 bit box but that doesn't sell new hardware.

_________________
Paint It Blue
I'm not into what passes for a "supercomputer" these days but that one is notable for being one of the very few using SPARC CPUs. It is nice that Fujitsu are committed to SPARC and too bad their boxes aren't more plentiful/cheap.

_________________
Paint It Blue
commodorejohn wrote:
Any last outposts of alternative architectures in this era of creeping x86/ARM duoculture are worthy of my respect.


You're the guy running NT on Alpha, aren't you?

Then no. :lol:

In all seriousness, pick an architecture you like and run it. There's nothing new under the Sun. Old stuff is usually better. Except Intel :evil:

How many people actually have any interaction with the hardware? UNIX boxes are 99% C and the rest is assembly wrapped in C. Most UNIX and Windows programmers are completely isolated from the box they're coding on. The API is the machine. Does it really matter what the architecture is as long as it performs as you want?

There are a lot of nice emulators around in case you like hardware you can't get for some reason.

_________________
Paint It Blue
commodorejohn wrote:
bluecode wrote:
commodorejohn wrote:
Any last outposts of alternative architectures in this era of creeping x86/ARM duoculture are worthy of my respect.

You're the guy running NT on Alpha, aren't you?

Then no. :lol:

And running VMS on VAX...and RT-11 on PDP-11...and Kickstart/Workbench 3.1 on Amiga...there's room for variety, is what I'm saying.


Sorry, man. No intent to pick on you. Just lamenting the state of affairs from a different angle. Unfortunately the point is still to most people the hardware doesn't matter. It doesn't matter to any C programmer if the hardware has register windows or a stack, etc. By the time the coder sees it it's all abstracted away unless he's writing the OS. It's only for those of us who love assembly programming the hardware matters but stuff like UNIX has made hardware magnitudes less relevant. The API is the machine. You will be assimilated.

commodorejohn wrote:
bluecode wrote:
How many people actually have any interaction with the hardware? UNIX boxes are 99% C and the rest is assembly wrapped in C. Most UNIX and Windows programmers are completely isolated from the box they're coding on. The API is the machine. Does it really matter what the architecture is as long as it performs as you want?

The API is not the machine, because you take the machine away and the API is just a collection of theory. Hardware will always matter because without it software is irrelevant. (Besides which, even in the RISC world architectures differ significantly in performance characteristics for different applications.) The idea that we've reached (or will reach) some kind of transcendent state wherein software runs in an ethereal realm of Pure Computation where the concerns of the physical processor world cannot touch it is futurist silliness.


APIs are not a collection of theory. It is the hardware as the OS presents it to you. Unless you're writing your own OS this is where your reality begins and ends. You can't see or touch anything below that.

Software is relevant without hardware. Software is an abstraction, hardware is an abstraction. You can run software through your head without any hardware. If you're an engineer you can run hardware through your head. It all depends on your world view. Everything is increasingly abstracted away and good hardware mostly doesn't matter any more, because nobody gets close to it. That's what I'm saying. There was a time when all this mattered but every day it gets further and further away...

"My advice to you, is to start drinking heavily..."

_________________
Paint It Blue
guardian452 wrote:
I will bake a cake. Carrot Cake !
Attachment:
Cake.jpg


That sounds pretty tasty and you're a good photographer too.

To the forum host and mods, thanks for the forums. Long may "unpopular" hardware and software wave!

_________________
Paint It Blue
Opera doesn't make money. Services make money. So they're working on email hosting and stuff that could make money.

In the meantime I grabbed their old releases for Solaris SPARC. Because some day it will all be gone.

_________________
Paint It Blue
Firefox is still making new builds for Solaris Intel and SPARC. And that's good since Solaris until very recently came with Mozilla 1.2 or something horrible and useless...

_________________
Paint It Blue
Oskar45 wrote:
Anyone on here ever had/worked on one? Besides SGI's, it once upon a time was my dream box. But although in comparison the former were price-wise a bargain, I never could afford the latter. And just having a copy of the "Lisp Machine Manual" is not really an adequate substitute :-)


No, I had a bad experience with LISP in the 1970s and didn't look at it again until the last couple of years. Neat stuff (now).

I hear the company is still in business and if you have the cash you can get a system and help from guys who actually know something.

_________________
Paint It Blue
pentium wrote:
I ran xlisp on my compaq Portable 386 but it seems to be really cranky about running anything.
I really want to get a LISP interpreter running on my PDP-11 though.


Isn't there LISP on trailing-edge?

_________________
Paint It Blue
kokoboi wrote:
It would be great if I could do dual boot Solaris/AIX.
However I tried AIX 4.1.3, 4.1.4, 4.1.5, 4.2.1, 4.3.3 and each time I got illegal instructions, abort trap.
Do I need to upgrade the firmware, it's ppcbug1 version 1.1 or do I need some special version of AIX from Motorola ?


Does modern AIX run on anything other than IBM hardware? I've never heard of anybody doing it. IBM software generally only runs on their machines. Not that that means anything for AIX, just a data point.

_________________
Paint It Blue
smj wrote:
Off topic, but... I stick with my '97 EX500 partly for that reason, it only weighs around 300 pounds. Fuel economy's pretty good too. But let me tell you: With a strong wind pushing you around while crossing the Bay Bridge, it does make you wonder if a little more weight would be such a bad idea... :shock:


It helps a lot and so does a long wheelbase. I rode small 400/500 class bikes for years and I was intimidated to get my dream bike but I finally did. At first it did feel like a Mack (not that I know what one of those feels like, but everything is relative right?) but pretty soon I couldn't stand to ride small bikes anymore. A local Moto Guzzi shop was giving free test rides and even though the bikes were sprightly and turned like a dream I felt very exposed perched out there alone in the breeze. It was like there was no bike, on those you sit way high. I prefer sitting down, in a Harley and using the forwards. Been in lots of bad weather from floods to hurricanes and big is what you want if you happen to be on a bike in unfavorable circumstances on the road.

Never rode a touring bike but they look like they would get plenty of sail effect.

I would like to show pics of my office but I'm pretty sure I have nothing guys on this board would be interested in :oops:

_________________
Paint It Blue
I want it, I want it all. I just can't afford it. If you still have this stuff when I get some cash your rx2620 is on the top of my list.

_________________
Paint It Blue