The collected works of zmttoxics - Page 3

I think a saw a post where this was related to bad trams or something. Might be worth searching.

_________________
Stuff.
Apple Fanboyism - such a terrible term. At what point is someone a fanboy? I have 5 macs, am I a fanboy? Some people here are collectors and have 20 macs. Are they fanboys?

Investing a quality product is like investing in a workstation. It is hard to call an iMac workstation grade because if a part fails the whole machine has to come offline for repair, but otherwise this machine is just as stable. I have no problem spending the big dollars if that means I can safely rely on my equipment. x86 doesn't have to be a disaster - its just a cpu. It is the platform that surrounds it that matters and the Mac platform is pretty fantastic.
Stuff.
You appear to have nothing more then a loaded DL760. http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quic ... 3_div.html

You Dad probably meant it was a custom order compaq, and not a specially designed one off compaq.

_________________
Stuff.
There were faster clocked after market G4s (up to 1.8ghz). A 1.8ghz g4 performed almost identically to the 1.8ghz g5.
Stuff.
bri3d wrote:
zmttoxics wrote: There were faster clocked after market G4s (up to 1.8ghz). A 1.8ghz g4 performed almost identically to the 1.8ghz g5.


In what benchmark? I'd imagine the 1.8Ghz G4 would perform similarly to G5 in synthetic 32-bit int and possibly float (not sure how Motorola's AltiVec units stack up to IBM's SIMD stuff but I'm guessing it's similar). However, the G4 had a painfully (almost ridiculously) slow bus and thus incredibly poor memory bandwidth compared to the G5, so I'd assume in the real world the G5 still blows it away.


Ya, still many many benefits to a G5 (especially ddr2 / pcie models). I cant find the article I had read, but it was all movie / image editing and rendering was like 5-10 seconds difference. In the end though, still comparing old with old. The world has moved away from the PPC Mac.
Stuff.
AH HAHAHA.

That is amazing. I completely forget this thing even existed over just a months time until you revived this thread. Wow. Just goes to show how uneventful the release actually was.

_________________
Stuff.
Good lord someone didn't share well with others as a kid. "I want one, give me yours."

_________________
Stuff.
Yeah, it is definitely not a T3. Looks older. I went through SunSolve and couldn't find one that matches it though I suspect it is from the SPARCStorage family (the only ones to list a 7 disk version).

Edit: The tech docs for the SPARCStorage 214 RSM seem to line up with those pictured.

_________________
Stuff.
Sure, you post here and you wait . Instead of doing part number 2, you have messaged everyone owner on this board with one asking for one. You tell me who is doing it wrong....

_________________
Stuff.
sybrfreq wrote:
Quote:
Sure, you post here and you wait.
he waited four months before bumping, how long was he supposed to wait... years? decades?

Was not related to the bumping, but the hunting down of current owners of crimsons and asking for theirs.

_________________
Stuff.
SAQ wrote:
ChristTrekker wrote:
bri3d wrote:
Agreed - unless it's got sentimental value like it does for VenomousPinecone (or you think it's particularly cool, although I don't see why you would) there's no point to a U10. There are better Sun hardware deals to be had.

My U5 was a freebie. That's a hard budget to beat when looking for Sparc upgrades. I don't know about where you live, but here, anything that's not x86 fetches a premium. It's very rare indeed to come across good deals on any SGI/Sun/whatever equipment.


Which is why I suggested you make your dollars count and skip the U10 "upgrade". A Blade wouldn't cost much more and would be much better.


I agree. Though I still consider a blade 100/150 a waste of cash, a blade {1,2}{0,5}00 of any variety can be had for fairly cheap and would be a much better performer.

_________________
Stuff.
My Blade 2500 was $150 CDN with 1 cpu, 2 XVR-1200s, 1x36GB drive and 2GB of ram.

I have however in the past managed to get Blade 1500s for $80 a piece for my work (helps that we bought like 30 of them but it happens).

_________________
Stuff.
josehill wrote:
fu wrote:
jose, is your setup inside a small/home LAN? do you have any experience w/ RDP over ssh?

Hi, fu. Just a home LAN, so I haven't been using ssh. Interesting idea, though -- some quick googling suggests that it's not an uncommon approach.

@skywriter - I ended up springing for a Microsoft Technet Direct Subscription so that I can download any edition of Windows (or Windows editions of Office, etc.) at any point to verify that a particular edition does what I want it to do. Worth the $250 or so a year for a geek like me. (1st year rate is $349, but you can usually find discount codes online to drop the price. Seems MS actually wants developers and testers to use Technet...)


I think SkyWriter did the same thing I did which was buy a new piece of hardware and get the OEM edition of Pro for super cheap ($160?). I don't enjoy windows... I only have 1 windows machine at home so a subscription wouldn't be a very cost effective solution.

_________________
Stuff.
It has a sweet feature list. I will definitely be giving it a shot my self! (I have the dev build in a vm but it runs like a dog).

_________________
Stuff.
You could try x11vnc, I have had good luck with it for sharing :0 on Solaris. There is an IRIX binary for it, but I am not sure how well it would actually work given IRIX has its own X server...
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/x11vnc ... se_mirror=

_________________
Stuff.
porter wrote:
ChristTrekker wrote:
Almost got a free E250 this weekend, but couldn't get to pick it up quick enough.


I don't think anyone could pick up an E250 quickly, you'll do yourself an injury. :)


They do have wheels though... :)

_________________
Stuff.
eMGee wrote:
I had no idea. I'd have to double check then (maybe it's an IRIX port specific thing), I was under the impression it streams whatever is on :0. Out of curiosity, does the program rely on OpenGL? Because that might be the bottleneck.

Yeah, it does only stream :0. In fact, you have to own :0 to start the program where as most vnc apps start another server on a different display port.

Mashek: I would try it, it may just work.

_________________
Stuff.
Rumor has it SFW is on the chopping block. Please send your "I love SFW" emails to [email protected] so that they can be tallied in an attempt to save it.

Woohoo Oracle. You are doing it right !

http://www.sunfreeware.com

PS: FYI: That includes anything under /usr/sfw/.

_________________
Stuff.
Not sure on the specs of these machines (check docs.sun.com or sunsolve.sun.com). What I can tell you is that SAS and SATA share a common connector. SAS Controllers are super fancy and work with both SATA and SAS drives, but SATA controllers do not work with SAS drives.

As for the raid contoller part, why wouldn't you use zfs? In terms of administration (believe on this), you are making your life EASY with zfs.

_________________
Stuff.
bri3d wrote:
zmttoxics wrote:
As for the raid contoller part, why wouldn't you use zfs? In terms of administration (believe on this), you are making your life EASY with zfs.


RAID-Z sucks. In terms of speed and reliability it's not really close to RAID-6 on dedicated controllers, especially as the number of drives grows.


I would like to see your numbers on that. IIRC Sun's recommended config for the x4500 is RAID-Z2.

http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/in ... 500_System

Edit: After reading some of the admin guide, I will s/RAID-Z2/any zfs configuration/. There admin docs are all about zfs by the looks of it.

_________________
Stuff.
jsloan wrote:
yeah, and there are some issues in our organization with tools and work flows, etc., that are all going to break with ZFS.

This isn't knocking ZFS - we're excited about it - but for this application we really do need physical raid controllers. I'm just not sure if it's possible to address 48 drives with physical controllers in a thumper, and am trying to find out how...


This however does make sense. I have seen many things break because of zfs.

That said, here is the admin guide from docs.sun.com: http://docs.sun.com/source/819-6562-17/index.html It only mentions the use of ZFS... I would see if you can find anything else on there.

_________________
Stuff.
Well, I thought for sure Oracle was going to 86 the SunRay, but I was wrong!

They have released the SunRay 3 Plus, and it looks pretty impressive sporting gigabit and dual dvi monitor support. Looks like it was announced in March, so it obviously wasn't big news but SunRay never really is.

http://www.oracle.com/us/technologies/v ... 61984.html
http://www.sun-rays.org/clients.html#sunray-3-plus

_________________
Stuff.
bri3d wrote:
re: reliability: http://www.mail-archive.com/zfs-discuss ... 28907.html

Of course the Thumper docs don't say anything about hardware RAID, because they were designed, implemented, and executed to run only RAID-Z. I don't think you could get enough ports off of any commercially available low-profile SATA RAID controllers to run hardware RAID on one (the disks are SATA, by the way, not SAS).

Sun have been switching between LSI and Marvell parts for a while (leaning towards Marvell lately). The X4500 is Marvell while the X4540 is LSI, if I recall correctly.


The link is in reference to a bug in a beta build from 2009, that even that article says will be fixed in the next build. ZFS has quirks, it can't be helped, but there are no major causes for concern in the stable releases. As far as most industry specialists are concerned - ZFS is production ready.

The whole "of course its raidz" was the point. You shouldn't buy a thumper unless thats the direction you want to take.

@OP: A better solution would be something like a 3511 storage array (not that model, its old, maybe the new 6140 is worth looking at) and attach it to an x41x0 style server over fibre. That also opens you up to the option of shared storage in the future.

_________________
Stuff.
I forget, did you try a new dvd rom?

_________________
Stuff.
Sorry, I meant DVD-Rom DRIVE not Disc.

_________________
Stuff.
indyman007 wrote:
Oh, no, I only have the one for the mac.

It is just an IDE drive, you can swap it out for the one in your PC and try it. The drive was bad on my PMG4 when I got it too (these systems are getting old if you forgot).

_________________
Stuff.
?
I think you are mistaken... That may have been the price when it was new, but they typically go from 1k to 5k depending on the configuration these days. There are discreet products like "Flame" that are very large video editing products with lots of add on hardware. The tezro "package" (like this: http://www.rdlx.com/discreet_flame_v9_system_hd.htm ) can be very expensive - because it IS very expensive.

Can't REALLY compare x86 Sun servers to a Tezro setup - different tasks at hand.

_________________
Stuff.
squigly wrote:
ah, yeah, you're right, the ebay items are indeed the discreet Flame, I thought it's just a cute nick name, like O2 "moosehead" or something.
Thx for clearing that up.

Btw, if we're on the topic, what would (roughly, of course) be the equivalent to Tzro in term of intel/amd hardware?


A Mac Pro maybe?

_________________
Stuff.
indyman007 wrote:
zmttoxics wrote:
squigly wrote:
ah, yeah, you're right, the ebay items are indeed the discreet Flame, I thought it's just a cute nick name, like O2 "moosehead" or something.
Thx for clearing that up.

Btw, if we're on the topic, what would (roughly, of course) be the equivalent to Tzro in term of intel/amd hardware?


A Mac Pro maybe?

A G4 maybe :D .

Well if you want to go by the Blender Render Benchmark results, it clocks in a round a Quad 2.5 G5 or early Mac Pro (which makes sense, its from that time period).

SGI: http://www.futuretech.blinkenlights.nl/ ... ender.html
Everyone else: http://www.eofw.org/bench/

But it matters not. The people that have them will tell you its not about benchmarks. :)

_________________
Stuff.
indyman007 wrote:
I know this is not my thread, I apologise for just using it for the purpose of my question.

You wouldn't happen to know what a decent price for a G5 is?

I sold my 2.0 DC with 6GB of ram for $500 last july. I wouldn't spend more then that. :)

_________________
Stuff.
skywriter wrote:
i like the old styling. but everything must change. i'll get one next year if my current iphone wears out, or is too slow to enjoy.

Yeah, I am going to wait until after the initial rush I think... I am still deciding if my current iPhone NEEEDS to be faster.

_________________
Stuff.
I make do with both actually. I use tcpdump on the linux boxes and snoop on the solaris boxes. When I need fancy settings for snoop, I just pipe to grep. Not super efficient but it works.

_________________
Stuff.
? Did you read wrong? It says .6 -> .10....

Edit: Oohh. You are talking about the Who is 10.0.0.6, 10.0.0.6 line? If I am not mistaken, that should be the FQDN or hostname for one of them.

_________________
Stuff.
.45 Caliber.

_________________
Stuff.
Titox wrote:
The V120 can be managed from ethernet (ALOM) or via serial cable if this configuration is enabled. There is more information in the Administration Guide .

Once you get access to ALOM, you have to redirect the console to the graphics card:

1. With the server in standby mode: sc> bootmode forth
2. sc> poweron
3. When the ok prompt appears: setenv output-device screen:r1280x1024x60
4. the last part is reboot the server, from the ok prompt: reset

Be carefully this is what I did in a V120 and maybe there is something that must be different.

edit: One more thing, In a V120 setenv output-device ttya sets the console to the serial port but I don't know how to redirect to the ethernet ALOM.


Don't confuse the 210 with the 120. The 210s have the ALOMS you mentioned, the 120s have LOMs (pre ALOM).

_________________
Stuff.
I wouldn't be too upset, the e450 is big, big on power, and not all that fast with todays Solaris. I have seen them used as tables though, as well as space heaters. :)

_________________
Stuff.
Isn't it like FN + F7 or something on most pc laptops to switch display modes?

_________________
Stuff.
How much for the octane2? I dont really need another system, but if its cheap enough I am in Ottawa... :)

Edit: Actually, any idea on what you want for any of the sgi or hp machines? There is an HP job opening in ottawa for an HP-UX systems engineer... :)

_________________
Stuff.
recondas wrote:
zmttoxics wrote:
How much for the octane2? I dont really need another system, but if its cheap enough I am in Ottawa... :)

Edit: Actually, any idea on what you want for any of the sgi or hp machines? There is an HP job opening in ottawa for an HP-UX systems engineer... :)
<cough>
philv wrote:
So here's the deal -- if you come pick these items up, they're yours for free.

:oops: :oops:
Boy is my face red! PM on the way! :)

_________________
Stuff.
*shrug*

I don't think the OS has built in support for it. I think you needed either a hardware raid or 3rd party software.

_________________
Stuff.