The collected works of josehill - Page 8

robespierre wrote: When it rains, it pours. John McCarthy died today .

I was wondering why my Siri was crying.
The Foundation cds are identical for all versions of IRIX, so, yes, if you have a full set of IRIX 6.5.5 cds, including the Foundation cds, then all you would need to upgrade to a later version of IRIX is the overlay cds.

If you plan on developing software, there were different sets of development libraries included with some versions of IRIX 6.5, so you may need additional cds in those cases. See http://www.nekochan.net/wiki/ ... nd_CD_Sets for more information.
The set you point to on eBay will not help you -- it is an "overlay" set, not a "foundation" set. Think of Overlays as "updaters," not as full installer cds. Foundation sets generally have significantly more than three cds. Take another look at the wiki link I included in my previous post for details.

At an absolute minimum, you will need a "Foundation 1" cd, a "Foundation 2" cd, and version-specific "Installation Tools and Overlays," the latter either as cds or downloaded from SGI, to perform a basic IRIX installation.

If you're still not certain what to get, the safest route is to find a full "Advanced Workstation Environment" bundle, which will include everything needed for a full, clean installation, plus a few extras.
arianon wrote:
Basically what I was doing was looking at getting something like this off ebay:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Silicon-Graphic ... 637wt_1163

I had thought that something like that would be just the foundation, so if I used that library set and got the 6.5.22 overlay CDs from SGI would that be enough for a clean install on a machine?
On the assumption that you mean general productivity applications, I'd go with Photoshop 3 and Illustrator 5 for graphics, NEdit for text, and assuming a fast enough machine, OpenOffice for office stuff.
Juda$ wrote: The CD's are the backup copies supplied with the machine I believe its 6.5.22 judging by the installed version on 1 of the disks. it is entirely possible that its just overlays that have been applied at a later date though to be honest.

Even if it is just an overlay set, the installation tools cd should be able to boot and load the installer.

When you say "backup copies," does that mean that they are CDs that someone burned, as opposed to actual CDs from SGI? If the former, it is very possible that they weren't burned correctly. Among other things that can go wrong, the filesystem on the boot CD must be in SGI EFS format, and the CD header must be correctly created (there is a thread on that somewhere on Nekochan).

Can you read the CDs on a PC? If so, they are probably in ISO format, not EFS. That's not the end of the world, however. You may be able to perform a net install, using your CDs in conjunction with the DINA virtual machine .

Of course, it could also be that the installation CD is damaged, and you need to get your hands on another.

PS. Yes, you were waiting long enough. It really should only take a couple of minutes at most in the step you mentioned.
recondas wrote:
There still seems to be some commercial demand for the Fuel V12.

Hmm... Feeling pretty good about my 800 MHz V12 Fuel, then. :mrgreen:

(No, it's not for sale. Probably never will be, either!)
I haven't seen that particular set of CDs before. If the list of CDs is accurate, it looks like someone mixed and matched CDs. I doubt that it is really "new in box," unless it was a special order. It looks like a partial 6.5.3 Overlay set (missing the Applications CD), an O2 LCD patch CD, and the patches for an O2 running the older IRIX 6.3.

It has an Installation Tools CD, which is enough to boot into the installer on many machines, but since it lacks the Foundation 1 and 2 CDs, it is not enough to perform a clean installation.

One other note: your Octane has a 400 MHz R12000 cpu. Since the R12ks weren't shipping when IRIX 6.5 first started shipping, early versions of the IRIX 6.5 installer won't work. I think you'll need at least IRIX 6.5.8, but I might be wrong.

I recommend getting your hands on an IRIX 6.5 Foundation 1 CD, an IRIX 6.5 Foundation 2 CD, and an IRIX Overlay set in the high teens or higher. IRIX 6.5.21 or 6.5.22 seem to be where many people land. You can also download the 6.5.22 Overlays from SGI. Also, again, consider running a net install using DINA.
Juda$ wrote: an someone with a little more experience than me tell me if the link below contains all the software I need to perform and install ? It does contain the installation tools and overlayswhich I believe are the important parts for booting the system but I would not mind a 2nd opinion.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/SGI-SOFTWARE- ... 3a6d1112b1
Looks great! Nice job, everyone!
Sean4000 wrote: lol. What exactly is that?

In SGI world, a shoehorn is a single-slot XIO-to-PCI adapter, while a shoebox (aka PCI cage or card cage) is an XIO-to-PCI adapter that supports multiple PCI cards. They were available for Octanes and Origin 2xs. For example, see http://www.nekochan.net/wiki/SGI_Octane
zafunk wrote: Works as advertized, Jose! Very handy bit of info. Thanks!!

Excellent! Happy to hear that!
Nice work! Might be worth figuring a place to put this into the wiki section on IRIX installation, if it's not already there.
Best wishes to you, too, foetz, and to all nekochanners as well! :D
ShadeOfBlue wrote: It works even if you don't have MIPSpro (use /var/sysgen/root/usr/bin/cc) or with other compilers on other OS's (tested with gcc, icc and clang).

Nice! I just ran it an old Mac OS X machine I have kicking around. :D
PymbleSoftware wrote: I don't have nroff installed on this machine, no time to fire up the main beasts, and I don't know where SGI nroff comes from

SGI nroff is found in the Documenter's Workbench (DWB) product. Although IRIX overlays contain updates for it, the base DWB product was not actually included with IRIX, but was licensed as a separate product. See this thread for (slightly) more info: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=12765
My relationship with watches is very similar to my relationship with SGI machines. I used to rely on them, and I still admire them and appreciate the engineering that was needed to design and to build them, but I find that I use them less and less. These days, when I need to determine the time, I usually use my cell phone, look at the wall, look at the display on my car, etc.

The only time I wear watches these days is when I go hiking where cell phones aren't practical or when I am dressed for a formal occasion. Somehow, wearing a tuxedo or a fancy suit without wearing a watch feels like walking around with an open zipper. Sort of.

Yeah, I'm an odd duck.
recondas wrote:
How about a thread for each beta app. Have the thread include the full name of the app to be tested, something like Beta Test: neko_newapp-0.1.13.tardist

Might it be worth setting up a separate forum, i.e. Board Index >> Miscellaneous >> Nekoware, if there will be more than a couple of betas?

I'd be happy to chip in with testing.
I was poking around SGI's Techpubs site today, looking for an IRIX 5.3-era man page, and I noticed that versions of IRIX prior to IRIX 6.5 are no longer listed in the Techpubs navigation links. However, SGI still has the pre-6.5 documents available through Techpubs as "archive" material. For your convenience, here are the links to the version-specific sections of the Techpubs archives:

IRIX 5.3 - http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi ... ?coll=0530
IRIX 6.2 - http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi ... ?coll=0620
IRIX 6.3 - http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi ... ?coll=0630
IRIX 6.4 - http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi ... ?coll=0640

For those who might be interested in creating their own, personal archives, there was a fair amount of discussion on the subject in this thread from a couple of years ago - viewtopic.php?f=10&t=10071
If you're up to speed with system administration on other platforms, you might check out UNIX and Linux System Administration Handbook, 4th Edition , by Nemeth et al. It runs through how to perform many common tasks, pointing out how various UNIX and Linux releases differ from each other. Nice format. The 4th Edition covers AIX 6.1, so it's not 100% current, but it should be close enough for an intro. (As an aside, the 2nd Edition is useful for IRIX admins. Unfortunately, the IRIX-specific content was dropped in later editions.)
I've been using TenFourFox for a while on my old 12" G4 PowerBook, and the last couple of releases have been extremely impressive performance-wise. A really great project!
hamei wrote: Whoa ! Gotta love it ! Altho i tend more to turning Javascript off rather than making it faster (it's nothing but a rattlesnake hiding under your bed) the rest of the project looks dang good ...

http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox/

and OS 9, too ...

http://www.floodgap.com/software/classilla/
hamei, where's the party?

http://techland.time.com/2012/04/02/25- ... ng-system/
hamei wrote:
You're trying to bait me ...

No, not really. I agree that it was a very lame article. It was just the first one that showed up in my RSS reader, and I thought that you might want to know about the anniversary, in case you weren't aware of it. I'm remembering debating the pros and cons of OS/2 and those new PS/2 machines with some of my college chums after the announcement, and suddenly I am feeling very, very old.
This seems like a good time to mention that if you have a MagSafe adapter that is three years old or less and is frayed at the MagSafe connector because of strain, there are a few weeks left to bring it to an Apple Store for a replacement (USA only) - http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4127 or https://www.adaptersettlement.com/default.aspx for more info. The replacement program ends on May 21, 2012. (I've had a couple of those adapters replaced for this reason.)
hamei wrote:
Is there a nedit for Mac ?

Yep...and it's just as good on MacOS X as it is on IRIX. (X11 required, of course.)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/nedit/f ... table/5.5/

As others have suggested, though, for editing a large file over a poor network connection, it would probably be better to login remotely and use a character-based editor in a shell or to check-out the file via source code management utilities and work on it locally.
Unless I am misunderstanding the question, why wouldn't you be able to do that?
Another useful one on a Mac laptop: fn-del = forward delete, i.e. the same as Windows backspace.

Apple has a list at http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1343?view ... cale=en_US
There are a handful of recordings that have been getting disproportionate play recently at Josehill Headquarters:

  • The Crimson Jazz Trio: King Crimson Songbook, Vols 1 & 2 (A former King Crimson drummer, Ian Wallace, deftly adapts King Crimson music to the jazz trio format. Surprisingly effective.)
  • Rush: Caravan/BU2B/Headlong Flight (Pre-album release singles from the heavy prog trio's upcoming "Clockwork Angels" disc.)
  • Susan McKeown: The River (my favorite Irish singer)
  • Idil Biret: Liszt's arrangements of Beethoven's symphonies for piano. Really great, if you like that sort of thing.
  • Bonnie Raitt: Slipstream (Her latest album is arguably her best. The cover of Gerry Rafferty's "Right Down the Line" is worth the price of admission by itself.)
  • Various recordings/transcriptions of Bach's BWV 1060. When I was a kid, the violin/oboe arrangement of this piece is what first turned me on to Bach. It still resonates.
  • Ensemble Organum: Chant Corse (Corsican liturgical music. Fascinatingly idiosyncratic.)
  • Garbage: Not Your Kind of People (New album, but reminds me of younger days.)
  • Duran Duran: Rio. (Don't judge.)
  • Cheap Trick: Rockford (I saw these guys play not too long ago, and I was surprised at the vitality of their newer stuff.)
  • Birdy: Supernominal Paraphernalia (Local power pop/guitar band from NYC area, never made it big, but influenced a bunch of folks. This is what a lot of clubs in NYC and Hoboken sounded like in the late 90s. Now defunct.)
  • Foo Fighters: Wasting Light (Heavy. Talented.)
  • Striggio's Mass in 40 Parts, with Hollingworth conducting.

I'm also looking for a good recording of Fauré's Requiem. I have the Montreal Symphony version with Te Kanawa, and I'm familiar with the Shaw and Rutter recordings, but I'm looking for something else. I recently heard a snippet of a recording that used a fairly small choir and sparse instrumentation, with a boy singing the soprano solo, rather than a female soprano. It was sublime, but I missed the recording credits.
hamei wrote:
Really ? Wow. Detachable Penis is one of my favorite songs .....

Umm...naturally? :lol:
At this point, I don't really think it is worth paying the considerable premium for the Retina display. It kind of reminds me of the premiums people used to pay for the early, giant flat panel TVs. It took a year or three, but the prices eventually came down quickly. Aside from wealthy folks or people who had very specific, professional needs, I think it's hard to justify paying the premium. If you want a lot of pixels, and size isn't a major factor, just get one of the remaining late 2011 17" MacBook Pros before they are out of new inventory. You'll get native 1920 x 1200 resolution, an optical drive, upgradeable RAM and hard drive, ethernet, a full warranty, and a reasonably current CPU/GPU combo, and some of the retailers are starting to discount them pretty heavily.

I still use my 1.5 GHz 12" G4 PB pretty frequently. It's no longer my daily driver, but I use it often for some of my hobby projects. While I also prefer having built-in Ethernet and a built-in optical drive, it's also true that I rarely use either. I was looking at one of the new 13" MBPs in the local Apple Store, and it would be a monstrous enough upgrade in performance from a G4 that I personally would be willing to spring another $100 or so for an external optical drive and ethernet adapter. I'm more concerned about the batteries in the latest machines. Judging from the teardowns on ifixit.com, it looks like they are almost impossible to remove. I really don't like placing an extremely expensive bit of hardware at the mercy of a non-replaceable battery. Definitely reduces the resiliency of the machines, IMHO.
guardian452 wrote:
I bet the new OSX coming this summer will support it with proper text sizes, etc, but for now you'll have to use a program like switchresx to set the screen to 2880x1800, and then have to deal with tiny text.

It's already shipping with a special, machine-specific version of Lion that is optimized for the higher resolution display. Unfortunately, there are only a couple of third party applications that directly support the higher resolution, but that should change reasonably quickly.

guardian452 wrote:
did they really have to change the charging plug? It isn't any smaller, doesn't provide any extra capacity... I have 4 mac laptops going back to 2007 here and all the power supplies are more or less interchangeable.

It's a good question, but it turns out that since the new MBP is so thin, they really did have to squash down the size of the new Magsafe adapter. There is only a minimal distance between the edge of the new adapter and the edge of the new MBP. Personally, I would much rather have a laptop that is a millimeter or two thicker so that I can reuse my existing power adapters, but I guess Apple decided this is a case where gee-whiz marketing is more important than customer convenience.
SAQ wrote:
Has this ever not been the case in the last 15 years?

Only fifteen? :D
theinonen wrote:
Actually the screen is running on the native resolution of 2880x1800. Resolution only appears to be 1440x900 as physical screen resolution does not change, only the size of the pixel that is plotted to screen.

...and pixel doubling is something that depends on the application. For example, see the screenshot of twitterific and twitter running side-by-side in this post - http://9to5mac.com/2012/06/18/on-the-ne ... ay-review/
theinonen wrote:
If I am not mistaken all the raster elements needs to be redone for the retina, or they will be scaled. So essentially if there are higher resolution graphics available for the application, then they can be rendered with higher detail.

If you look the lower picture from my earlier post, you can see that some icons are much sharper than others. That is because there are higher resolution icons provided for some applications and the blurry ones are just scaled to double size. I would assume Apple is doing something similar, but differently.

Yes, that is how it is handled.
I just spent some time playing with the Retina MBP, and the thing that stood out the most for me wasn't the screen, but the machine's sleekness and light weight. At first glance, this machine seems more like a very fast 15" MacBook Air than an MBP. Indeed, the regular 15" MBPs nearby seemed fat by comparison.

The screen is lovely, but not lovely enough to make me hand over the cash to buy. I have a five year old MBP, and I have an iPhone 4S (w/Retina), and I often use them side-by-side. The iPhone display is obviously much crisper, but not so much so that I feel like I'm giving up anything important when I look at my MBP. Of course, I expect that I would feel differently if I spent my day working with very high resolution photos, etc.
WolvesOfTheNight wrote:
What they are missing is that I don't really care about the faster processor - after all, I am OK with my 1.5GHz powerbook G4. What I do care about is what the G4 has but their new machine is missing...

Yeah, it sounds like a build-your-own Hackintosh would be a better fit for you. I am a bit dismayed by the disposable computing trend that Apple and others seem to be following.
I take back some of what I said - it looks like the other MBPs are a bit better the Retina model regarding upgradeability and user customization: http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/06/li ... re-its-at/

hamei wrote:
But I've been saying this for a long time now - people don't need anywhere near the computing power we've had for ten years. A fuel is fine. A dual-core fuel would be perfect. The R18k would have been all the computer SGI needed if they had had a brain to market it. Sure, I'd like a little of this and a little of that but in fact, it does everything I need

I think there is a lot of truth there. WolvesOfTheNight is still mostly happy with his 1.5 " G4 PB, and I still use one routinely for managing the website and email for a charity. I usually only notice that machine's age (7 years) on the rare occasions when I need to look at something using Flash. My daily driver is a five year old, 2.3 GHz MBP, and the only time I find myself wishing for more speed is when I try to edit HD video. Even then, it's completely manageable. Unfortunately, the machine won't be supported by next month's Mountain Lion OS release, supposedly because Apple says that the machine's GPU isn't quite up to the task of displaying some whizzy animations or other kinds of useless widgetized crap in the OS. Nonsense, of course. I understand the need to limit support of older machines in order to keep the cash flowing, but for a company sitting on mountains of cash, Apple has been getting worse, not better, in terms of longterm product life cycle support.
In my experience, this issue is usually caused by either permissions problems or misconfigured DNS settings.

tingo wrote:
ajw99uk wrote: Are there separate chkconfig settings for each account?

I don't think so. If you read again what he wrote: "...get root privileges..."
to me, that implies that chkconfig is only used by the root user.
I might be wrong, I'm only a newbie when it comes to IRIX.

Correct - chkconfig settings are system-wide. They are used to determine which system scripts are run when an IRIX system starts up and shuts down. Each chkconfig setting corresponds to a script in the /etc/init.d directory.
Best wishes, Harry! Please do stop by from time time to time. We'll be sure to keep a cold six pack in the refrigerator!
ajw99uk wrote: It would be good to have a better idea of exactly what adding a user does behind the GUI dialogue boxes. The manual explains some of it, but not to the level I need to sort out the current problem. Pointers to which files I should be checking for permissions problems would be welcome. I'd have hoped that System Manager could set things right when adding a user but perhaps there is a "default profile" with (on my system) wrong permissions, which get carried across to the new home directory? However, there is very little in the new home directory, so perhaps the "default profile" (assuming there is one) has gone completely AWOL!

Have you taken a look at the man pages for sysmgr , UserManager , and addUserAccount ? Those are the programs that actually run when you add new users through the System Managers, and their configuration files (listed in the man pages) control what is placed in a user's default "profile."

One tip, particularly since you are using a machine that was set up by someone else: there are many places where a system administrator might choose to customize a user's environment, and some of these may conflict with or override settings that are made by System Manager. For example, when a user starts a tcsh shell, as many as six tcsh configuration files might be read, but only two of those are initially written by System Manager's account creation process. For example, see viewtopic.php?p=56903#p56903

ajw99uk wrote: Not sure I follow why DNS would be an issue - local user on local system, and network access as root seems fine. Can one add users before setting up the network? (i.e. while the system is still "IRIS" and using the default standalone IP address)

I probably should have said "hostname" instead of DNS, but it's the same basic issue. The IRIX GUI keeps track of certain kinds of objects, including Desktop icons, using hostname information (or, in some cases, NIS or DNS information). In the dim ages of history, the idea was, in part, to make it easier to share objects, like CD-ROM drives, over a network. If the system is misconfigured, the Desktop gui might not be able to find everything and draw icons for things like CD-ROM drives, even if the CD-ROM drives are accessible via the command-line interface. I haven't thought about this stuff in a while, so I'm hazy on the details, but it used to be a reasonably common annoyance in older versions of IRIX, like 5.3. It's less of a problem of in IRIX 6.5. The key items in older IRIXs were things with names like Cadmin, objectserver, directoryserver, etc., but IIRC, only bits and pieces of them survive in IRIX 6.5. For 6.5, the key things to look up are the fm and fam programs.

Titox wrote: Maybe the System Manager doesn't creates the necessary files in the user directory. I have always created the users from EZSetup. EZSetup checks the integrity of files.

While EZsetup offers to configure a couple of Desktop settings that are not included in the standard set of System Manager prompts (e.g. cursor focus, Toolchest orientation), EZsetup and System Manager both use the same underlying commands and defaults to create new users. Indeed, one of the first things that many system admins do with new IRIX systems is to disable the EZsetup account and then either use the System Manager or automated methods to set up new user accounts. It is extremely unlikely that the choice of EZsetup vs System Manager is the source of the problem.

ajw99uk wrote: But, like you, I had understood there is only one set of chkconfig entries determining what services are running for all users, as confirmed by other responses here. Given the range of things governed by chkconfig, a one-per-machine approach makes much more sense than a one-per-user - it's rather more fundamental than your browser favourites or choice of background or screensaver!

Yes. General system-wide setup/configuration files tend to be found in the /etc directory (like the chkconfig and " run level " files), while user level customizations tend to be found in individual user directories.

ajw99uk wrote:
tingo wrote: I might be wrong, I'm only a newbie when it comes to IRIX.

Me too! but enjoying the learning process, with help from the forum.

Glad to hear that you are enjoying the process. Keep the questions coming!
recondas wrote:
ajw99uk wrote: Indigo2, IRIX 6.5.22m, only a root account ( how it came to me
As you might be in the process of discovering, sometimes it's less headache to just save any licenses and clean install previously admin'd systems.

Indeed. To the original poster, if you have the media available to perform a clean system installation, it might be much easier to backup your system (especially any license files for special software like compilers, added features, and third party tools), erase the drive by creating a new filesystem, and start from scratch.
IIRC, Sun started including the open source Companion CD with Solaris 8.

For Solaris 2.5, 2.6, and Solaris 7, most folks who didn't have access to the proprietary Sun compilers went to the old sunfreeware.com site to get started.

By the way, although the sunfreeware.com site no longer maintains packages for Solaris 9 and earlier, there are still a few mirrors online that provide access to the old packages (like gcc 2.8 through gcc 3.4.x) at no charge to end users. The mirrors should be more than enough to allow bootstrapping to current package versions.