foetz wrote:
dexter1 wrote:
prize money of USD 55.000 is a damn cheap crowdfundingly steal
the us government had similar "challenges" not so long ago and the prize money there was not much more. compared to their budget it's a joke
uunix wrote:
Sorry, is that a typo? $55 DOT 000 ? I have my long range glasses on and can't see the screen!
Fifty-five thousand dollars in total : We use dots for thousand delimiter marks, the US folks use commas IIRC.
Foetz is right, on a 17 billion USD budget those 55000 USD hardly make a dent in their expenses. You could possibly recruit a programmer fulltime for 6-8 months doing the job.
praetor242 wrote:
A buddy of mine works at Ames and is a sysadmin for Pleiades. Right now all their developers are doing other things. If I knew Fortran, this would be alot of fun!
It is
but interfacing with C and C++ libraries (probably only GPU, but maybe Lustre/Infiniband) from a FORTRAN program means you have to use Swig or write wrappers which does argument type conversion for each function you use.
Most default types are easy, but complex and zomplex and string types are a different matter: they need careful testing.
Furthermore there is this matter of possible different name mangling between Intel and GNU compilers, which necessitates multiple compiler specific interfaces: Although that can be tested and adjusted if necessary.
Regarding Josehill's comment which crossed my post:
It is true that allocating project-millions for HPC machinery is actually easier than recruiting support and programmers on a project after that initial big budget spend.
For years I am trying to get faculty heads and ICT bosses around the fact that they should change the way projects are budgeted: Not prioritizing acquisition funds of hardware and software from whoever gives you the best deal, but also allocate money for developers who can teach researchers new skills in writing code and new ways of performing computation.
But man, that is frustratingly hard