The collected works of Adrenaline - Page 2

smj wrote:
hamei wrote:
So, Adrenaline ... since you've outed yourself, let me ask a question or two :
(flapping my arms about wildly) Danger Will Robinson, Danger!!

Oh, I guess he won't get that reference... :mrgreen:

What's not to love about Lost In Space :)

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
Hamei, a good example of DC Metro area developers from yesterday, the following code gets hit when a change to a Help Ticket occurs and emails the associated people. Pretty cut and dry, and should scale from 1 user to 20, 30, 40 etc.

Code:
foreach (var address in users.Where(a => !string.IsNullOrEmpty(a)).Distinct())) {
using (MailMessage msg = new MailMessage())) {
msg.From = new MailAddress(NotificationFromEmail);
msg.To.Add(new MailAddress(address));
msg.Subject = subject;
msg.Body = body;
msg.IsBodyHtml = true;

using (SmtpClient smtp = new SmtpClient()) {
smtp.Send(msg);
}
}
}


The vendor spent days trying to figure out why this was slow as more users got attached to tickets. A simple glance to even a non-programmer would question, why would you open and close the Smtp Server connection for every single email? On top of the fact, the function was not set to be asynchronous, so the post back waited for every single email to be sent.

I asked my boss exactly what he intended, and he had actually asked for 1 email to go out not x number of emails, where x is the number of users attached to the ticket.

< 5 minutes later, removed the foreach loop and replaced the msg.To line:
Code:
using (MailMessage msg = new MailMessage())) {
msg.From = new MailAddress(NotificationFromEmail);
msg.To.Add(String.Join(";", notifyUsers.Where(a => !string.IsNullOrEmpty(a)).Distinct()));
msg.Subject = subject;
msg.Body = body;
msg.IsBodyHtml = true;

using (SmtpClient smtp = new SmtpClient()) {
smtp.Send(msg);
}
}

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
For me, the lack of DataSets and non-existence of TPL in the WinRT Framework turned me off from doing development for it. I brought this up to the Program Manager of .NET and apparently they are working on it, so who knows.

The one good thing about Windows 8, more specifically WinRT is that there are no more interop calls when referencing say a C# WinRT in an unmanaged C++ Application. It's all handled cleanly. I've gone down this route to make my calls to WCF Services painless in my Win32 C++ apps (ie created the WCF proxy in the WinRT Library and then referenced the WCF calls in my C++ code).

Other than those points I don't have a real desire to make a Windows 8 native app in my free time, Windows Phone 8 however I am very interested in. We finally get multi-core hardware to play with.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
guardian452 wrote:
... they just ballsack it up with their shit microsoft software. Hopefully that will change. The fact that they changed the start menu for the first time in forever may be a sign.

I too have had a Zune for several years now and love it, have you actually used a Windows Phone extensively? It's been a breath of fresh air since I switched from an iPhone back in November 2010.

Having developed at least 2 native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Phone 7 each, I can safely say in my opinion, Microsoft definitely has the best tools and if you already do C# (especially if you had done Silverlight and/or WPF previously) you can get yourself up and running in a day. I haven't seen the WP8 SDK, but I can imagine with VS2012 support it will get even better.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
guardian452 wrote:
No, but it almost was. My next phone may be. Said partner (see above) had a windows phone and said it was shit. I sort-of took his word for it, and they were not available in the verizon store, and the salesman there said I didn't really want one anyways. I don't have anything to complain about with the iphone as it does everything I need. I've only been using the iphone since this summer and I miss the small size, durability, wireless range, and battery life of my Nokia 6010. When/if my iphone dies I'm threatening to go back to a basic nokia phone like that. It is nice having a music player and cellphone and camera all in one, with email; I sometimes browse the web with it but other than that, not-so-much. Oh, and Skype. Skype is useful ;)


I will be the first to admit, the first year (November 2010->November 2011) was tough if you loved apps that you had on your iPhone. It really wasn't until about a year ago that Windows Phone finally got a lot of the banking and other useful apps with 100% of the same functionality with that of the iPhone version. The good thing, as with many things, the wait was well worth it. The apps on the Windows Phone I find much more attractive and aren't just carbon copies of the iPhone version.

It's definitely not perfect for everyone (as no phone is), but definitely check out the new Verizon Windows Phone 8 devices, I believe they have an exclusive Samsung ATIV Odyssey coming their way to replace the Windows Phone 7 2010 model that's been on Verizon's lineup since launch.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
mrbob wrote:
Visual Effects since 1993
mostly feature film & television

and yes I am still using SGI!! just about everyday.
mostly my octane2 & Tezro.

Before SGI i was using amiga.

-mrbob 8-)


Doing my dream job! I envy you.

I'm doing everything under the sun with C# from ASP.NET, WinForms, WPF, WP7, MonoTouch, MonoDroid, MVC and recently Windows Workflow Foundation. While not doing anything groundbreaking at a global level like I dream of doing one day, I am glad to say, the applications I have written in the US Healthcare Accreditation industry blow away the government equivalents. It's been fun showing my applications to them over the years :)

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
mrbob wrote:
FANX

so what do you use your 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB for.

When I do get time to jump back into indie film making I wanted to use them for 1080p processing from my Canon XL-H1 & Nikon D7000, but in the mean time I've been writing small C++ apps to test scalability of my algorithms, since I don't get much time to test my code on my employer's 24 core Opteron HP G7s.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
I really hated it too and had only 3 weeks to develop a full content management system app that tied into a web service, so I ended up using MonoTouch with the free MonoDialog library. Later on when I did Android and Windows Phone 7 ports, it was really neat to be able to keep all but my UI Layer in one C# Library. I think my iPhone/iPad source was only about 1400 lines and most of that was simply TableDelegates and iOS specific UI code.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
From the first time I saw an Octane, must have been 1999? I knew I had to get to one. It took 6 years, but I did finally get an R10k 225mhz in decent shape from Reputable Systems back in 2005.

I did love the fact I would buy a 2 CPU Module, upgradable graphics (I remember upgrading from the SSI to a V6, what a night and day difference), but lack of an internal CD/DVD rom drive and the PCI Cardcage being expensive back then kind of discouraged me from pursing it.

Now I've got a Fuel, O350, tons of O300s. While yes, the Octane still sits proudly in my collection, from a practical standpoint, using my O300s or Fuel over SSH/VNC is much more practical now with readily available LSI SATA Controllers and SSDs. But then again it really depends on what you're doing with your Octane, especially if you've got a Dual 600mhz/V12 Octane.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
guardian452 wrote:
I already have my dream-team of SGI boxes so I don't need any more (I can only use one at a time anyways!) so let's suppose nuuumbré #1 so I can provide a false statement and enjoy a fun game of chance. ;)

Now if on offer was something like a truckload of pies 8-) or a porsche ?? :twisted: Although I admit, I had to re-read your post 4 times before I understood the question.


Kind of the feel the same, while yes I wish I had a maxed out Onyx 4 enclosure, definitely wouldn't some of the "nice to have" machines, keeping the wife happy with a 38U IBM Rack in our living room is hard enough as it is.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
It depends on what you would need it for, don't expect it to perform like a modern era x86/x64 Intel or AMD machine in every task. Web browsing on all but the higher end machines is painful, but C/C++ programming, practice with UNIX and something new to learn are all very viable on an O2. I had a R5k 300mhz a few months back, it worked great as a frontend for my Origin 300s and since got a Fuel to do that job.

Definitely make sure you've got a decent U160/U320 drive like a Maxtor Atlas II 15k or Seagate 15k.3, that made a huge boost in my O2's loading times of IRIX.

Having and using a SGI machine today is unique to the individual, I won't speak for everyone on here, but I get a huge sense of enjoyment out of working on them in tandem with my current generation AMD hardware.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
Axatax wrote:
Quote:
everything on Origin/Octane was PCI behind a BRIDGE anyway.


I've often wondered about this -- I'd be shocked if the graphics were behind a PCI bridge.

I could have sworn Octane's graphics was on it's own XIO 1.6gb/sec channel.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
Congrats! When you get it connected, post your hinv in the hinv section .

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
rooprob wrote:
mia wrote:
Too bad Irix doesn't have trim support though. You should run diskperf btw.


That's fair concern about TRIM and getting a definitive story around support, especially when masquerading as a SCSI disk.

I picked the old line of OCZ Vertex2 128GB as a) SATA 2 IO rate still exceeds the SCSI2 bus, b) end of line is cheap and c) came out when no OS natively supported TRIM. Although I'm no expert, the controller onboard SandForce SF-1200 takes care of marking deleted blocks via garbage collection routine obviating the need for TRIM (apparently).

I'd watch out for that Vertex 2 or any SF based SSD. Had several SF-XXXX series SSDs die on me (Agility 2s/3s, Vertex 1s/2s/3s, Corsair Force 3s, SanDisk Ultra Extreme) over the years. The only drives that hadn't failed were my Samsung 830s and my new 840 Pros. I should note I do still have 1 30gb Vertex Plus as a caching drive in a ZFS Pool that's been running for 2 years now without errors. So your mileage may vary.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
jimmer wrote:
Japan. I might go in spring. I guess I'll be free to off myself sometime next summer. Sorted.


If you can, make it up north to the Aomori Prefecture. It's got beautiful country side and tons of hiking trails. Loved going there once a month as a kid, definitely need to go back at some point.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
I'd love to see Göbekli Tepe, the Carnac stones, Derinkuyu and Easter Island in person at some point.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
mia wrote:
Now, the real question isn't how fast it is, but how you use it...


Exactly! And that speed is in the eye of the beholder. On a very responsive application (i.e using asynchronous non-UI thread blocking coding) you can turn many devices with much less MHz/ghz, slower IO into a great platform. It's that most software these days is written with the mindset of "I've got tons of processing power, SSDs, gigabit Ethernet etc, why should I care about performance?" I see it all the time in my part of the country. Typically the answer from them is, buy better hardware not look at the code and make it better. Often times it's them simply not using the right approach for the problem, taking the shortcut.

Went through some very underperforming C#/SQL yesterday, the original coder on top of calling a pretty complex SQL twice (once in the code behind to a variable he wasn't doing anything with and the other in the page itself), he was doing a SELECT * on the query when he only needed 2 columns out of 20.

What's funny (and sad) is that those same folks, don't code with more than 1 CPU in mind. As we know on here, most of the time, the more cores, the lower clock rate, so in a single threaded application you might actually get worse performance than that of a less core/higher clock server/client.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
Some keyboard shortcuts that will make your Windows 8 experience on a Desktop or Laptop much better:

Windows Key + X - Brings up a nice shortcut for Control Panel, Command Prompt etc
Windows Key + C - Brings up the slide out as if you were to move your mouse to the top right of your screen and then down
Windows Key + I - Brings up your settings options including the Power Button to Shutdown or Restart (although a Windows Key + D and then Alt + F4 will bring up the "standard" shutdown box)
Windows Key - Will bring you back to your "Windows 7" view.

On the "Tile" aka Metro View, you can just start typing the name of the app, like notepad for instance and hit enter before the search result even appears if you know it is the only app

Definitely group your apps on the main view, by clicking the "minus" icon in the bottom right, right clicking on a "column" of tiles and then clicking on the "Name Group".

For me I never really used the Start Menu since XP, I always just pinned my apps to the Taskbar or left a shortcut on my desktop. So now instead of leaving the less used apps on my desktop I have them pinned to the "Metro View" instead, leaving my desktop free and clear.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
jan-jaap wrote:
I kind of like the Seagate Cheetah 15K series. I'm only using the 15K.3, 15k.4 and 15K.5 series. They have FD bearings are aren't louder than a consumer SATA disk.

I know others (Ian M. ?) like Maxtor disks.


Yeah I'm a big fan of the Maxtor Atlas II 15k series, just make sure you get the Atlas II series, much quieter and a little bit faster. I've picked up 73gb drives for $20-$25 off eBay, the 146gb drives are the harder to find for that price point.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
smj wrote:
Forgive me if I'm being stupid -- is there in fact a how-to somewhere? I may have missed a link...


I had written one up back in 2005-2006, but I had since lost it. I could do another write up using the latest versions coupled with phpMyAdmin and some of the other tools you would most likely use in conjunction with PHP, Apache and MySQL.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
ShadeOfBlue wrote:
Try:
Code:
-march=r12000 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-math-errno -fno-rounding-math -fno-signaling-nans -funsafe-math-optimizations -fgcse-sm -fgcse-las -fipa-pta -ftree-loop-linear -ftree-loop-im -fivopts -fno-keep-static-consts

These options make some numerical code run 40% faster than MIPSpro's "-Ofast=ip35 -TARG:processor=r12000 -OPT:IEEE_arithmetic=3 -OPT:alias=typed". YMMV.

Also note that you shouldn't use "-Ofast" on gcc, since it enables "-ffast-math", which enables "-ffinite-math-only", which will break your code if it uses Inf and NaN (the Javascript interpreter probably uses them).

You can also try adding:
Code:
-fgraphite-identity -floop-block

to the above options. Then you can try adjusting "--param l1-cache-size", "--param l1-cache-line-size", and "--param l2-cache-size" for better performance. You can also try other Graphite-based optimizations, but they're still a bit experimental and can break the compiler :)

If the code doesn't use C++ exceptions, add:
Code:
-fno-exceptions -freorder-blocks-and-partition

(if it does, the compiler will warn you).

If the code doesn't use C++ RTTI, add:
Code:
-fno-rtti

(as above, if the code uses this, the compiler will warn you).

Also, link everything statically (this also improves program startup time).


That's one of the best posts I've ever seen on a message board, thank you!

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
I've got an Octane 2 + some extras if you want it just pay for shipping and whatever you feel like I would be good with. I believe it had 2gb of ram, V6 and a Dual R12k 300.
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 (2x) :O3x0: 4x700mhz R16k/4GB :PrismDT: 2x1.6ghz 8mb/12gb/SAS/2xFGL
IndyFred wrote:
Adrenaline - I am most interested. Can you let me know what you think shipping would be to 80247?

Can you send me images please?

Thanks!

Fred


I will check to make sure it's still 100% before I go any further, it's been probably 6-7 months since I last turned it on, luckily I have second nearly complete V6 Octane sans a working power supply so I could pull parts if need be. I imagine it'd be ~$60-$70 from Maryland to you, Octane's aren't lightweight in the least unfortunately.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
Scored a Tezro finally!

hinv:

Code: Select all

Location: /hw/module/001c01/node
IP53_2CPU Board: barcode NER821     part 030-1869-001 rev -C
Location: /hw/module/001c01/IXbrick/xtalk/11
WS_INT_53 Board: barcode NAS082     part 030-1881-006 rev -A
Location: /hw/module/001c01/IXbrick/xtalk/12
ODY128B1_2 Board: barcode NAT284     part 030-1884-002 rev -D
Location: /hw/module/001c01/IXbrick/xtalk/15
WS_INT_53 Board: barcode NAS082     part 030-1881-006 rev -A
Location: /hw/module/001c01/IXbrick/xtalk/15/pci-x/0/1/ioc4
IO9 Board: barcode NGN490     part 030-1771-005 rev -A
Location: /hw/module/001c01/IXbrick/xtalk/15/pci-x/1/3
PCI_SIO_UFC Board: barcode MTN726     part 030-1657-003 rev  A
2 700 MHZ IP35 Processors
CPU: MIPS R16000 Processor Chip Revision: 2.1
FPU: MIPS R16010 Floating Point Chip Revision: 2.1
CPU 0 at Module 001c01/Slot 0/Slice A: 700 Mhz MIPS R16000 Processor Chip (enabled)
Processor revision: 2.1. Scache: Size 4 MB Speed 350 Mhz  Tap 0xc
CPU 1 at Module 001c01/Slot 0/Slice C: 700 Mhz MIPS R16000 Processor Chip (enabled)
Processor revision: 2.1. Scache: Size 4 MB Speed 350 Mhz  Tap 0xc
Main memory size: 8192 Mbytes
Instruction cache size: 32 Kbytes
Data cache size: 32 Kbytes
Secondary unified instruction/data cache size: 4 Mbytes
Memory at Module 001c01/Slot 0: 8192 MB (enabled)
Bank 0 contains 1024 MB (Premium) DIMMS (enabled)
Bank 1 contains 1024 MB (Premium) DIMMS (enabled)
Bank 2 contains 1024 MB (Premium) DIMMS (enabled)
Bank 3 contains 1024 MB (Premium) DIMMS (enabled)
Bank 4 contains 1024 MB (Premium) DIMMS (enabled)
Bank 5 contains 1024 MB (Premium) DIMMS (enabled)
Bank 6 contains 1024 MB (Premium) DIMMS (enabled)
Bank 7 contains 1024 MB (Premium) DIMMS (enabled)
Integral SCSI controller 3: Version Fibre Channel QL2342 Port 1, 133 MHz PCI-X
Integral SCSI controller 5: Version Fibre Channel QL2342 Port 1, 133 MHz PCI-X
Integral SCSI controller 4: Version Fibre Channel QL2342 Port 2, 133 MHz PCI-X
Integral SCSI controller 6: Version Fibre Channel QL2342 Port 2, 133 MHz PCI-X
Integral SCSI controller 2: Version IDE (ATA/ATAPI) IOC4
CDROM: unit 0 on SCSI controller 2
Integral SCSI controller 0: Version QL12160, low voltage differential
Disk drive: unit 1 on SCSI controller 0 (unit 1)
Integral SCSI controller 1: Version QL12160, low voltage differential
Integral SCSI controller 7: Version SAS/SATA LS1064
Disk drive: unit 0 on SCSI controller 7 (unit 0)
IOC3/IOC4 serial port: tty3
IOC3/IOC4 serial port: tty4
IOC3/IOC4 serial port: tty5
IOC3/IOC4 serial port: tty6
Graphics board: V12
Gigabit Ethernet: tg1, module 001c01, PCI bus 3 slot 2
Integral Gigabit Ethernet: tg0, module 001c01, PCI bus 1 slot 4
Iris Audio Processor: version MAD revision 1, number 1
Iris Audio Processor: version RAD revision 13.0, number 1
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x1077, device 0x2312) PCI slot 1
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x1077, device 0x2312) PCI slot 1
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x1077, device 0x2312) PCI slot 1
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x1077, device 0x2312) PCI slot 1
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x14e4, device 0x1645) PCI slot 2
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x10a9, device 0x100a) PCI slot 1
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x104c, device 0xac28) PCI slot 2
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x1077, device 0x1216) PCI slot 3
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x14e4, device 0x1645) PCI slot 4
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x1412, device 0x1724) PCI slot 2
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x10a9, device 0x0005) PCI slot 1
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x1000, device 0x0050) PCI slot 2
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x10a9, device 0x0003) PCI slot 3
IOC4 firmware revision 83
IOC3/IOC4 external interrupts: 1
HUB in Module 001c01/Slot 0: Revision 2 Speed 200.00 Mhz (enabled)
Dual Channel Display
IP35prom in Module 001c01/Slot n0: Revision 6.210


Things to do:
[list=]
Migrate as much data to my SSD
Swap my Quad 700mhz O350 Board into the Tezro
[/list]

2.18.2013
Swapped out the Origin 350 Quad 700 R16k nodeboard into the Tezro (though I gotta reseat/enableall/etc Bank 0 and 1 as they are disabled):

Code: Select all

[chimera]:/ $ hinv -vm
Location: /hw/module/001c01/node
IP53_4CPU Board: barcode MZY234     part 030-1868-001 rev -C
Location: /hw/module/001c01/IXbrick/xtalk/11
WS_INT_53 Board: barcode NAS082     part 030-1881-006 rev -A
Location: /hw/module/001c01/IXbrick/xtalk/11/pci-x/1/1
PCI_SIO_UFC Board: barcode MTN726     part 030-1657-003 rev  A
Location: /hw/module/001c01/IXbrick/xtalk/12
ODY128B1_2 Board: barcode NAT284     part 030-1884-002 rev -D
Location: /hw/module/001c01/IXbrick/xtalk/15
WS_INT_53 Board: barcode NAS082     part 030-1881-006 rev -A
Location: /hw/module/001c01/IXbrick/xtalk/15/pci-x/0/1/ioc4
IO9 Board: barcode NGN490     part 030-1771-005 rev -A
4 700 MHZ IP35 Processors
CPU: MIPS R16000 Processor Chip Revision: 2.1
FPU: MIPS R16010 Floating Point Chip Revision: 2.1
CPU 0 at Module 001c01/Slot 0/Slice A: 700 Mhz MIPS R16000 Processor Chip (enabled)
Processor revision: 2.1. Scache: Size 4 MB Speed 350 Mhz  Tap 0xc
CPU 1 at Module 001c01/Slot 0/Slice B: 700 Mhz MIPS R16000 Processor Chip (enabled)
Processor revision: 2.1. Scache: Size 4 MB Speed 350 Mhz  Tap 0xc
CPU 2 at Module 001c01/Slot 0/Slice C: 700 Mhz MIPS R16000 Processor Chip (enabled)
Processor revision: 2.1. Scache: Size 4 MB Speed 350 Mhz  Tap 0xc
CPU 3 at Module 001c01/Slot 0/Slice D: 700 Mhz MIPS R16000 Processor Chip (enabled)
Processor revision: 2.1. Scache: Size 4 MB Speed 350 Mhz  Tap 0xc
Main memory size: 6144 Mbytes
Instruction cache size: 32 Kbytes
Data cache size: 32 Kbytes
Secondary unified instruction/data cache size: 4 Mbytes
Memory at Module 001c01/Slot 0: 6144 MB (enabled)
Bank 0 contains 1024 MB (Premium) DIMMS (disabled)
Bank 1 contains 1024 MB (Premium) DIMMS (disabled)
Bank 2 contains 1024 MB (Premium) DIMMS (enabled)
Bank 3 contains 1024 MB (Premium) DIMMS (enabled)
Bank 4 contains 1024 MB (Premium) DIMMS (enabled)
Bank 5 contains 1024 MB (Premium) DIMMS (enabled)
Bank 6 contains 1024 MB (Premium) DIMMS (enabled)
Bank 7 contains 1024 MB (Premium) DIMMS (enabled)
Integral SCSI controller 3: Version Fibre Channel QL2342 Port 1, 133 MHz PCI-X
Integral SCSI controller 4: Version Fibre Channel QL2342 Port 2, 133 MHz PCI-X
Integral SCSI controller 2: Version IDE (ATA/ATAPI) IOC4
CDROM: unit 0 on SCSI controller 2
Integral SCSI controller 0: Version QL12160, low voltage differential
Disk drive: unit 1 on SCSI controller 0 (unit 1)
Integral SCSI controller 1: Version QL12160, low voltage differential
Integral SCSI controller 7: Version SAS/SATA LS1064
Disk drive: unit 0 on SCSI controller 7 (unit 0)
Integral SCSI controller 8: Version Fibre Channel QL2342 Port 1, 133 MHz PCI-X
Integral SCSI controller 9: Version Fibre Channel QL2342 Port 2, 133 MHz PCI-X
IOC3/IOC4 serial port: tty7
IOC3/IOC4 serial port: tty8
IOC3/IOC4 serial port: tty3
IOC3/IOC4 serial port: tty4
Graphics board: V12
Integral Gigabit Ethernet: tg0, module 001c01, PCI bus 1 slot 4
Iris Audio Processor: version RAD revision 13.0, number 2
Iris Audio Processor: version MAD revision 1, number 1
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x1077, device 0x2312) PCI slot 1
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x1077, device 0x2312) PCI slot 1
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x10a9, device 0x0003) PCI slot 1
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x10a9, device 0x0005) PCI slot 2
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x10a9, device 0x100a) PCI slot 1
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x104c, device 0xac28) PCI slot 2
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x1077, device 0x1216) PCI slot 3
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x14e4, device 0x1645) PCI slot 4
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x1412, device 0x1724) PCI slot 2
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x1000, device 0x0050) PCI slot 2
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x1077, device 0x2312) PCI slot 3
PCI Adapter ID (vendor 0x1077, device 0x2312) PCI slot 3
IOC4 firmware revision 83
IOC3/IOC4 external interrupts: 1
HUB in Module 001c01/Slot 0: Revision 2 Speed 200.00 Mhz (enabled)
Dual Channel Display
IP35prom in Module 001c01/Slot n0: Revision 6.210


2.12.2014 - Swapped out the Quad R16000 700mhz 4mb Cache nodeboard for a Quad R16000 700mhz 8mb Cache nodeboard:

Code: Select all

$ hinv -v
4 700 MHZ IP35 Processors
CPU: MIPS R16000 Processor Chip Revision: 2.1
FPU: MIPS R16010 Floating Point Chip Revision: 2.1
CPU 0 at Module 001c01/Slot 0/Slice A: 700 Mhz MIPS R16000 Processor Chip (enabled)
Processor revision: 2.1. Scache: Size 8 MB Speed 350 Mhz  Tap 0xa
CPU 1 at Module 001c01/Slot 0/Slice B: 700 Mhz MIPS R16000 Processor Chip (enabled)
Processor revision: 2.1. Scache: Size 8 MB Speed 350 Mhz  Tap 0xa
CPU 2 at Module 001c01/Slot 0/Slice C: 700 Mhz MIPS R16000 Processor Chip (enabled)
Processor revision: 2.1. Scache: Size 8 MB Speed 350 Mhz  Tap 0xa
CPU 3 at Module 001c01/Slot 0/Slice D: 700 Mhz MIPS R16000 Processor Chip (enabled)
Processor revision: 2.1. Scache: Size 8 MB Speed 350 Mhz  Tap 0xa
Main memory size: 8192 Mbytes
Instruction cache size: 32 Kbytes
Data cache size: 32 Kbytes
Secondary unified instruction/data cache size: 8 Mbytes
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 (2x) :O3x0: 4x700mhz R16k/4GB :PrismDT: 2x1.6ghz 8mb/12gb/SAS/2xFGL
Thanks! Just swapped out the Origin 350 nodeboard into the Tezro, 0 issues.
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 (2x) :O3x0: 4x700mhz R16k/4GB :PrismDT: 2x1.6ghz 8mb/12gb/SAS/2xFGL
mia wrote: Could you please run some disk benchmark:
mkfile 4g testfile
diskperf -W -D -r 4k -m 4m testfile

Thanks!


Here you go:

Code: Select all

#---------------------------------------------------------
# Disk Performance Test Results Generated By Diskperf V1.2
#
# Test name     : Unspecified
# Test date     : Mon Feb 18 20:18:27 2013
# Test machine  : IRIX64 chimera 6.5 07202013 IP35
# Test type     : XFS data subvolume
# Test path     : testfile
# Request sizes : min=4096 max=4194304
# Parameters    : direct=1 time=10 scale=1.000 delay=0.000
# XFS file size : 4294967296 bytes
#---------------------------------------------------------
# req_size  fwd_wt  fwd_rd  bwd_wt  bwd_rd  rnd_wt  rnd_rd
#  (bytes)  (MB/s)  (MB/s)  (MB/s)  (MB/s)  (MB/s)  (MB/s)
#---------------------------------------------------------
4096   32.14   29.53   33.01   31.65   31.86   16.40
8192   56.73   53.78   57.66   55.81   57.27   29.94
16384   94.73   89.60   93.78   90.82   94.64   54.61
32768  136.63  129.35  137.84  132.01  138.45   92.24
65536  178.00  171.92  180.03  172.49  177.35  140.61
131072  209.83  204.63  210.00  200.39  209.91  184.70
262144  231.29  227.91  231.66  222.42  231.07  216.19
524288  243.72  245.93  244.54  245.02  245.67  242.08
1048576  251.05  260.09  252.72  258.85  251.44  257.32
2097152  255.59  267.22  254.93  265.70  254.63  264.64
4194304  255.84  270.00  256.38  269.60  256.06  269.12
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 (2x) :O3x0: 4x700mhz R16k/4GB :PrismDT: 2x1.6ghz 8mb/12gb/SAS/2xFGL
mia wrote: thanks a lot!


No problem!

For comparison, the Maxtor Atlas II 15k 73gb I have in there too:

Code: Select all

#---------------------------------------------------------
# Disk Performance Test Results Generated By Diskperf V1.2
#
# Test name     : Unspecified
# Test date     : Mon Feb 18 20:50:19 2013
# Test machine  : IRIX64 chimera 6.5 07202013 IP35
# Test type     : XFS data subvolume
# Test path     : testfile
# Request sizes : min=4096 max=4194304
# Parameters    : direct=1 time=10 scale=1.000 delay=0.000
# XFS file size : 4294967296 bytes
#---------------------------------------------------------
# req_size  fwd_wt  fwd_rd  bwd_wt  bwd_rd  rnd_wt  rnd_rd
#  (bytes)  (MB/s)  (MB/s)  (MB/s)  (MB/s)  (MB/s)  (MB/s)
#---------------------------------------------------------
4096    1.01   21.55    1.03   11.98    0.94    1.06
8192    1.98   37.81    2.09   19.16    1.83    2.08
16384    3.88   61.12    4.29   21.82    3.58    3.93
32768    7.35   79.99    9.01   28.53    6.84    7.45
65536   16.79   80.22   20.83   32.21   12.43   13.34
131072   29.85   80.35   25.93   36.82   20.97   21.82
262144   38.93   80.65   39.97   44.74   32.33   32.76
524288   52.96   52.28   51.61   50.41   44.06   45.04
1048576   58.50   60.16   59.73   60.38   54.05   54.65
2097152   66.66   69.55   64.20   68.28   62.26   65.58
4194304   70.01   73.43   69.30   72.39   67.94   70.47
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 (2x) :O3x0: 4x700mhz R16k/4GB :PrismDT: 2x1.6ghz 8mb/12gb/SAS/2xFGL
mia wrote: Great, thank you for taking the time, I was hoping you might also have some more recent SSDs?


I just got a pair of the new 128gb Samsung 840 Pros, but those went into my primary PC. I have a pair of Corsair Force GT 90s I could benchmark (the Samsung's replaced these) and a OCZ Vertex 4. If I get some time this week after work I'll benchmark the others, but it may take until Saturday to do.
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 (2x) :O3x0: 4x700mhz R16k/4GB :PrismDT: 2x1.6ghz 8mb/12gb/SAS/2xFGL
That last part is the one that gets me. For the last couple weeks I've been publishing a new app to the Windows Phone store (all free without ads) each week just to get comfortable with the different API calls (Lock Screen, Live Tile, OAuth, Push Notifications, offline storage etc). It will get to the point where I'll be comfortable with every component, the problem will be coming up with the next big thing or even a big thing.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
mia wrote: ping!


I did not forget, definitely looks to be a Saturday morning thing. Got the wonderful task of revamping an enterprise iOS app I did about a year ago to match feature by feature of the recent Windows Phone app I did. Which in itself isn't fun, but only having until end of day Friday to wrap it up coupled with ASP.NET bugs in legacy systems, my week isn't going to be much fun :(
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 (2x) :O3x0: 4x700mhz R16k/4GB :PrismDT: 2x1.6ghz 8mb/12gb/SAS/2xFGL
Sad I was in a different age bracket when I joined back in 2005 :(

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
guardian452 wrote:
When I joined I was under 20 and very quickly had :Octane: :Octane: :Octane: :O2: :O2: :Indigo2IMP:

Back in the good old days, I was stupid back then. Still is :D


Yeah I was 19 when I joined, shortly after getting my first Octane off of Reputable Systems.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
legalize wrote: http://gsaauctions.gov/gsaauctions/aucdsclnk?sl=91QSCI13132715


A shame I was just there, probably could have gotten my grand parents in SJ to hold onto it for me.
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 (2x) :O3x0: 4x700mhz R16k/4GB :PrismDT: 2x1.6ghz 8mb/12gb/SAS/2xFGL
mia wrote:
vishnu wrote:
It must have been a painful moment for SGI when they realized that that market no longer existed... :x


What a shock it must have been for them when they realized that you can buy about 100 PC for the price of a fuel.


There was some R&D to recoup, but you have to wonder how much it was marked up back then especially when you could assume most of that generation of hardware's R&D went to the Origin 3x0.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
leaknoil wrote: What's the OS of choice for these ? Just a generic IA64 linux distro or is there one that's customized for these ?


Debian has been working fairly well on the A350s I have
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 (2x) :O3x0: 4x700mhz R16k/4GB :PrismDT: 2x1.6ghz 8mb/12gb/SAS/2xFGL
Anyone else interested in getting Rabbitmq ported?

http://www.rabbitmq.com/download.html

I spent a little time this morning working on getting erlang compiled (which it needs) - I will hopefully get that component compiled and into a tardist this weekend at the very least.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
vishnu wrote:
"I know, we'll write it in Erlang!" Or, How to Ensure That No Developers Will Ever Join Your Project... :lol:

Would be nice though because then we could also add wings3d to Nekoware...


I'm not a fan that it utilizes Erlang over C/C++, but any time I can make use of my Origins/Tezro in conjunction with my C# I try to. If I ever win the lottery I'm investing in a kickstarter to get Mono ported to MIPS/IRIX.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
porter wrote:
I'm sure it does what it says on the tin, alas I was turned off RabbitMQ due to an evangelist who insisted on using it tol solve every problem, it was his hammer, and hence saw every problem as a nail.

One of the problems of turning an existing conventional sequential request/response system is you have to reverse engineer every distributed request/response operation and turn it into a sequence of asynchronous operations, that the RabbitMQ people then invent RPC over MQ is to admit defeat and in an instant destroy the advantages of highly asynchronous systems.


It's definitely not a solution for everything, but if you've worked with other messaging systems that are platform independent I'd love to hear about it. The next big project that will take to July 1st next year is ramping up and I could use some alternatives.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
hamei wrote:
Adrenaline wrote:
I spent a little time this morning working on getting erlang compiled (which it needs) - I will hopefully get that component compiled and into a tardist this weekend at the very least.

That would be great if you could do it ... I've "compiled" erlang (said it succeeded but in practice, refused to make any executables that work) a few times with no non-trivial success. I really like variety but an old stick tied to your leg with a bandana is no substitute for a wheel.


That was one of the issues I was running into on Sunday - I'm hoping to work through those on Monday though. I'll keep this thread updated with my progress.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB
Backed and spread the word on Twitter - I hope it takes off. It's a really neat idea.

_________________
:Indigo: 33mhz R3k/48mb/XS24 :Indy: 150mhz R4400/256mb/XL24 :Fuel: 600mhz R14kA/2gb/V10 Image 8x1.4ghz Itanium 2/8GB :O3x08R: 32x600mhz R14kA/24GB :Tezro: 4x700mhz R16k/8GB/V12/DCD/SAS/FC/DM5 :O3x0: 2x700mhz R16k/4GB