gijoe77 wrote: I would have loved to see this girls face when she first saw the lyrics..
"So, what exactly ARE these things?"
"Uhh... OK, well the crossbar switch connects things together, like the CPU might... "
"Sorry, what's a seepeeyue?"
gijoe77 wrote: I would have loved to see this girls face when she first saw the lyrics..
Intuition wrote: Wow, just randomly today looking at old information stumbled upon an article which has a photo of a 1000 render node farm at PDI/Dreamworks in 2001 and lo a behold.... the nodes are all SGI Origin 200.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/4803
That must have been a million dollars+ of Origin 200.
JEEZ
rooprob wrote: Yes please!
Dodoid wrote: IG-01 printing now. No "PT" moniker here. There may be minor revisions, but this means I consider the device good enough to sell in its current state and will focus on preparing for sale from now on. If you would like to contribute to the development of the device, a survey regarding how the community would like me to proceed with the project will be coming soon.
computron wrote: is it possible to have a better surface quality ?
it's a bit rought !! no ?
Cheers
Eve
nekonoko wrote: It's a possibility, but at a glance it looks like it's a lot of work to set up and configure as well.
nekonoko wrote: I just don't have the time right now to sink into a project like that. You're under no obligation to donate - it's just an option for people that want to assist.
ClassicHasClass wrote: Some decals, too.
SiliconClassics wrote: I'm going to post each of these Indys to eBay with their original contents intact, with 20% to charity.
Y888099 wrote:SiliconClassics wrote: Thanks, it's not unexpected - these kinds of reactions are typical.
I wonder why. It's so irrational
SiliconClassics wrote: It's currently over $2,000 on eBay with three days left in the bidding. That would be an awful lot to spend on a computer just to take a sledgehammer to it.
SiliconClassics wrote: Dreamworks is supposedly the actual IP rights holder for Turok, but neither they nor anyone else has any legal standing to subpoena me about this sale. And I'm happy to report that the buyer is someone whom I know from past transactions - a stand-up individual who is exactly the kind of person who can be trusted to take care of this relic.
SiliconClassics wrote: Sorry, I didn't mean to suggest that the buyer would leak the code, just that he would properly preserve it and prevent it from being lost. And yes, the law does generally impose accomplice / conspiracy liability on someone who picks another person to do the dirty work, so I couldn't rightfully strike a deal with someone to buy the Indy and "fence" the code without exposing myself to potential legal consequences. But that's all hypothetical, and at this point neither I nor anyone else can know exactly what's going to happen with the contents of this Indy in the coming months.
foetz wrote: it's too short for covering those years properly. there's too much missing
vishnu wrote:Dodoid wrote: Pointing a cantenna at my friends house and hoping we can connect via Xbee.
When I was your age we did that with two tin cans and a piece of string...
Raion-Fox wrote: I emailed Mashek about a base and screws for me. But I'm not in dire need of a base.
If I sell the O300 I'll have enough to start looking at getting a V12 for the Onyx 350, and getting another O350
dexter1 wrote: Tasty! Where is your food-facebook page?
Geoman wrote: It's somehow tragic, that now they do a brilliant fan-service for the community, SGI is probably going to disappear soon.
johnnym wrote: Nice one! Keep going. When will you show off your Indys and you Indigo²?
computron wrote: it's a good initiative, but too much generalist.... no tech details or arch analysis.
you totaly omit to talk about SGI history important part : gfx pipe history and evolution !!!!
Cheers
Eve