The collected works of Dennis Nedry

I've come across this problem so many times it isn't even funny.

Manufactures like to cram high-speed fans in network equipment, so they're covered when the device is operating at *full load* (ie, 48 active ports). Most switches I've seen will throw off a fair whack of heat when they're loaded, too. I've never seen a switch with thermal management on it either, these things are meant to be stuck in a closet anyways.

So.

I would not recommend that you fiddle with the fan to permanently /limit/ it's speed. You can damage your switch doing this.

I would highly recommend that you purchase one of these:

http://www.frozencpu.com/products/5299/ ... ?tl=g34c17
http://www.frozencpu.com/products/5298/ ... ?tl=g34c17

Both of these are designed to bolt onto the fan itself. One is a solder version (you'll need to put it in the middle of the fan power cable!), the other is a 3-pin version (most fans use this connector, the switch might too). They both throttle the fan speed depending on temperature and are relatively cheap. Therefore, your switch fan will run at the speed it needs to, depending on the load (and heat dissipated) from the switch.

I've installed these gadgets on countless switches, from 3Com's to Netgear and Linksys. Linksys I know usually uses the 3-pin connectors (so you don't need to solder anything), but I'm not sure about NG.

-DN
I've got butterfingers!
Greetings to all.

As per my last post about Numalink, I'm considering to purchase a pair of SGI Altix's.

Here's the specs to the best of my knowledge:

- Yellow/Black front panels
- Dual Itanium2 1ghz Processors (**not** Itanium 1's)
- 2GB RAM per node
- One node has the Base Compute I/O module, DVD Drive, and 2x36GB disks
- One node has no DVD drive, and 1x36GB disks (along with a spare caddy?)
- Both have the redundant PS's.
- Both are in the SGI boxes (!!!), apparently "Used for a day in a lab". No rails included.
- 2x Numalink cables included.

What would these guys be worth these days? They're in mint condition, and both working.

I intend on running Linux on these bad boys, along with Xen ( apparently Suse supports Xen/Itanium now...).

-DN
I've got butterfingers!
Greetings to all.

I'm not really sure where else to post this. A while ago I was pinged by a close friend who apparently had a very large system up for grabs from a datacenter he works at. I could have sworn that they had policies for decommissioning this stuff (usually through IBM or some other corporation), but alas- I was informed that strings could be tugged and **if** I can arrange for pickup out of my own pocket, and I'd get a chance to actually own a real IBM z9 Mainframe ("OMFG").

I just got back from a day trip over there to take a peek at the unit, which was unfortunately still running as they've apparently yet to completely replace it with a z10. It's uh, big. I was basically pointed to what looked like a dual-cabnet chassis with a purple/blue stripe down the centre of one of the doors, and informed that was the unit I'd be looking to pick up in about a month. I got a peek behind one of the panels, which basically revealed a laptop running some sort of proprietary OS (OS/2?), some sort of fibre card cage on the bottom, and some peculiar looking components near the top with four very thick insulated "tubes" running to them- I'm assuming the thing has it's own compressor/condenser/evaporator for cooling.

Now, this is where I basically get lost. The expanse of my knowledge is limited to some foolery inside Hercules-390, IPL'ing the z/OS ADCD distribution and poking around in the Unix environment and ISPF.

In other words, I have zero hardware experience with this sort of iron.

I have no idea what sort of power this thing requires (aside from "lots"). I have no idea what sort of capabilities it has (aside from the 4x insulated tubes, which I'm assuming were running to 4 processors, or 4 groups of processors?), what the main storage size is, or what sort of disk drive gear it requires to boot (probably DASD?). Hell, I don't even know what the thing will boot- I'm assuming I sure as heck won't get z/OS with it, and I don't know if these machines boot Linux natively (though I do know Linux runs under z/VM, but again, z/VM isn't exactly torrentable).

So I guess my completely, utterly vague question is...

What could I do with this machine? Could I do anything with it at all?

Is this even something that can be hooked up to residential power? I can easily get a dedicated breaker panel installed, but I'm guessing something like this would run on 3-phase... Is 3-phase power something that can be brought into a residential building? Or would the power company laugh at me for even asking?

I have a feeling the answer is going to be "You should know this stuff, otherwise you're not fit to run a machine like that", but I gotta ask anyways. I'd love to be able to IPL an actual zSeries in my own house (garage), but I'm starting to wonder what sort of league this machine is really in. The largest system I've ever owned && run is a Sun 4800, which is like 1/8th the size of that z9. Likewise, I'd rather not dedicate my entire yearly salary to running said machine for a day, if that is indeed how much power it requires (google says the z9 tops at 18.3kW, minimum 9kW... Frankly, I have no idea what that rating means, since most of what I deal with is the 20A rated C19 server cords and the larger twist-lock wall sockets that most of my workplace UPS's plug into).

-DN

_________________
I've got butterfingers!
No, it's not that unit from Flickr. The tubing on the cooling system is slightly different, and I think there was only one laptop- but I could be wrong. The cable colors at the bottom were also different.

The machine is a 2094-S28, and though I can't get details on the exact specifications yet, IBM says that machine requires a minimum of 6.8kW and a maximum of 18.3kW of power, depending on the configuration, and dissipates 21.5kBTU of heat/hour to a max of 62.4kBTU/hour.

That's a lot of heat, and a lot of power, even at the low end.

I think bri3d is right on this one. They made it clear today that I would not be getting z/OS or anything that might contain any sort of software with it (probably due to licensing crap), nor am I getting any sort of storage systems or the equipment outside of the z9 EC cabinet. Apparently, my friend was under some pressure to let them format the laptop(s) inside the cabinet too- I'm pretty sure that would have rendered the entire thing useless as I'm guessing those are the HMC's and are required to IPL the entire setup.

So if I did pay to get it back to my house, hookup power, get some sort of cooling system probably installed on the side of the garage, buy some sort of DASD storage unit, I *might* be able to boot Redhat- quite possibly the world's most generic distribution of Linux.

Which really sucks, because I was looking forward to possibly playing with z/OS on real zSeries iron, but it looks like it would be cheaper by several magnitudes to just run out and buy a large HP x86_64 server or build my own if I /really/ felt the need to run Redhat, or run Hercules-390 on that if I really want to play with S/390.

Oh well.

Thanks for all the replies.

-DN

_________________
I've got butterfingers!
Woot!

Looks like I'm getting a zSeries after all!

Landed up going down there again to drop off some Sparc gear for my bud, and the "IBM guy" just happened to be sitting in his office twiddling his thumbs (apparently a very rare situation). So I landed up knocking on his door and chatting him up about the z9 EC. Not surprisingly, the unit does run off 3-phase power and requires dual 240VAC/60A circuits to boot. As I wasn't entirely clear what was going on before, the storage units (I think he called them a "shark"?) are being dedicated to the new machine, though it's not like I could have crammed them in the garage- they take up more room then the z9 itself and also require 3-phase power.

Went back down to the machine floor to take a look at a lone pSeries 275 and landed up walking past an already disconnected single cabinet zSeries machine. It had a red metallic stripe on the front rather then the blue/purple on the z9, so I asked about it... Turns out it's a z800/2066, with 16GB of RAM, ESCON/FICON connectivity options, HMC/Support Element (looked like a freestanding tower instead of a laptop), and it's licensed for z/OS (though again, no software included). There were also 4 DS6000 storage units installed in another rack, loaded with disk drives (not sure how many or what the size was- all I know is that it's apparently bootable, I'm guessing they're 36 or 72GB drives).

Turns out they're looking to get rid of this system, *and* the storage units too. Best of all, the z800 runs off single-phase 240VAC (still need a beefy breaker and some thick wiring though), and the DS6000 units run off 120/240 single-phase (dual C13 connectors on the rear).

The gear certainly wasn't free (I question if they were going to give me that z9 for nothing)- landed up paying $3750, plus time and effort to cart two racks, some sort of tape drive/library, two desktops (the p275 and HMC), a monitor, box of cables, and a bunch of documentation home. Got a truck lined up for next weekend, hopefully I'll be able to get a 240VAC line installed in my basement (which is thankfully walk-out) along with a window A/C unit to keep the z800 cool, along with a few ethernet lines up to my office so I can plunk the HMC down on my desk.

Either way, I'm told the machine shouldn't have any issues booting Linux, and apparently it's coming with everything I need to IPL it. Aside from the HMC which is preconfigured, the software is apparently my issue, so I suppose it'll be fun to get this machine up and running. Certainly the largest box I've /ever/ owned, and the fact that it at least boots Linux is nice (though z/OS would be nicer- I'll have to check out the z/VM trial).

The only real downside is that my 4800 got axed as a part of the deal- I don't have the need or desire to keep it around (it sucks up a fair whack of power and throws of enough heat to keep half the basement comfortable in the winter), and my friend said he'd gladly give it a good home... Hell, though, I'd trade a Sun 4800 for a frickin' zSeries 64-bit box any day.

Will try to post pics when I get the box in the basement and IPL'ing.

-DN

_________________
I've got butterfingers!
> Got any news regarding the system?

Um, ugh. Bit of a sore point with the other half at the moment.

I did land up getting the "equipment" shortly after I last posted (that was one hell of a day). It landed up being three racks- the z800, a rack with the DS6000's, and another rack with a quad set of IBM Ultrium libraries, all stuffed in the back of a large truck with not one but four P275's, the HMC machine, 5 Thinkvision LCD panels, and a few boxes of cabling, manuals, blank tapes, keyboards, and mice.

Apparently, my wife thought that "Three IBM racks" meant "Three IBM towers". Probably because I told her about the P275 and the HMC that were going in my office. So you can imagine the look that anyone would exhibit when they realize you've brought home more then a ton (?) of jet-black IBM equipment in three full-sized racks damned near the size of our refrigerator (each). The resulting footprint of all the gear in the garage booted out my car onto the driveway until I could figure out how to get it into the basement without marring the hardwood.

That really was only the half of it- because a few weeks later, we moved across Canada to Victoria, BC. All the house stuff fit in one truck (easily). I had to fly back the day after we arrived to rent a second truck, and haul all the IBM gear across Canada *again*, while the wife sat at home for two days with a refrigerator, microwave, our annoyed and confused cat, and not much else.

I've yet to work up the courage to phone an electrician and get someone down here to hook up a 240VAC mains in the basement for everything. Right now, everything except what I could cram in my office is sitting outside, on pallets, shrinkwrapped up. As much as I'd love to fire that stuff up right now, I have no idea what sort of wrath I'd be bringing upon myself if I launched into that hobby at this very moment. We're not quite settled into the new place so it hasn't really been a priority...

-DN

_________________
I've got butterfingers!
Greetings to all.

I've got the chance to purchase a fairly loaded Sunfire v880z. I initially thought it was a fairly boring v880, until I walked around to the back and noted the presence of four 13w3 connects on the /left/ hand side of the chassis... Yeah, you guessed it, dual XVR-4000's. The system is coming from a medical lab, and although the drives have all been pulled, the caddies are included and they didn't touch the RAM or anything else in the system. I *think* it has quad 1.2ghz processors and something like 32GB or 64GB of RAM, I'm not sure- the unit was apparently powering a proprietary display system of some sort, and they didn't have any 13w3 monitors to boot into OBP to check it out when I was down there.

As much as I /want/ the system, I don't know what I'd /do/ with it. I already have a metric ####ton of Apple and IBM gear, including the three racks that make up my z800, still taking up a parking spot in my garage, yet to be unwrapped. Figuring that my office breakers are pretty much topped off right now, I don't think the Mrs. would appreciate an 880z sitting in the kitchen hooked up to the 20A circuits over there (figuring that's the only other place I can pull +20A/120VAC).

They're asking around $2200 for the box, but I might be able to badger them down to ~$1600.

ATM, I'm only really interested in the XVR-4000's, because I've never /seen/ one of these in person (owned a few XVR-1000's, nice cards- though I'm told the XVR-4000 will kick the shit out of those anyday). More then likely, I'd be tossing the whole box up on Ebay or piecing it out as soon as I get it back home.

So... What are these XVR-4000's worth these days? All I can find is that the original list price was just shy of $30K/piece. As I've implied, I've never seen these on Ebay before, nor am I sure if there are even people actively searching for them. I certainly don't want to buy the box and have to stick it in my garage with the IBM gear, since I've got enough unhooked-up stuff lying around already.

$1600 seems a little high for such an old(ish) system, but again, I have no idea what the framebuffers are worth.

-DN

_________________
I've got butterfingers!
Thanks for the replies.

That's sort of what I figured. I wasn't sure if they were still worth anything (given the power of modern day cards), I just knew they were rare, having never came across one before. As I recall the XVR-1000's used to sell for a pretty penny (back before PCI Express), though these days I've seen them go for $40/pop or lower. I wasn't sure if the 4K's were in the same boat, but it sounds like it.

-DN

_________________
I've got butterfingers!
Time Machine + Caldigit VR backup drive ( http://www.caldigit.com/CalDigit_VR/ ).

I wouldn't recommend Retrospect unless you need multiple backup schedules and different sets of rotating backup media. On a production XServe managing a few hundred Mac workstations, yeah- Retrospect might be the way to go, but a Mac Mini is a borderline disposable server. Invest in a decent external drive, fire up Time Machine, let backupd do the heavy lifting and you're covered in case the Mini implodes.

-DN

_________________
I've got butterfingers!
What's the Sony box?

I've never seen (and I'm presuming) a tape drive like that.

Edit: Nevermind. I should try reading down a few posts before I insert foot in mouth.

-DN
I've got butterfingers!
If that's one of those round keys with the (parallel) cuts down the outer side of the barrel...

I'm pretty sure you can defeat those by using a BIC pen with the cap removed from the end (or anything that fits snugly into the lock- so there's a fair amount of friction), by just jamming it in there and turning it in the direction the lock opens, then slowly pulling it out (while continuing to turn it).

I've defeated a few locks like that on other various keyless equipment.

If it's a bog standard pin/tumbler lock... You can defeat those easily enough with a bent jumbo safety pin (or anything else that retains it's shape under pressure) and a screwdriver... Google lock picking, it's easier then you might think. Paperclips might work, but they tend to bend before you can apply enough leverage to pop up the rear pins.

-DN
I've got butterfingers!
I knew this worked for bike locks, but I wasn't sure about these kinds. From the looks of it, the case lock is only a 4-pin (whereas things like soda machines have 8 pins), so maybe it'll be easy to break into. Worst case, I ask HP if they can send me a replacement. I suspect they issued the same key for all of their C8000s.


Likely. I'm not aware of any manufacture that makes per-machine key sets. I think that would cost them too much to make each lock unique for every computer shipped.

Either way, it should still work. I had to deal with one of those (4-pins, super-cheap lock) on a keyless rack about a week ago. It took me about 2 minutes to pull apart a BIC pen and widen the end with a pair of side cutters. Jam the end of the pen into the lock, slowly pivot it around the tumbler axis while turning it in the direction that it opens... 15 seconds later, the rack latch merrily popped up and the rack was open. Wasn't really part of my job at the time, but I had to say something when I saw them heading off to find a drill, a hacksaw, and a crowbar (they'd locked themselves out of the cabinet and had to get to the tape library to install fresh media).

-DN
I've got butterfingers!
What am I missing here?


I have no clue, but whatever it is, I'm missing it too.

The fasterest I sell at the moment is 733MHz PowerPC and Quake III is just barely playable.


This.

That's totally what I don't understand. It's underwhelming hardware (no offence) running a proprietary operating system. Most of the gear is online order only and exceptionally expensive to boot. I suppose there's always AROS running on x86, but I could never understand the appeal of it (that, and the UI is pretty fugly).

On a totally unrelated side note, I did have the pleasure of working with an ATW800 once. Now that was a cool machine, way back when Transputers were the shit. I think the system had something like 12 individual processors in it, and was running a seriously offbeat version of Unix along with some whacky 3D package (I think it was called Sabre? Can't remember). As I recall, this was around the time that the first Pixar Image Computer was making noise and Jobs was off working on something at NeXT.

I sorta miss those times, when men were men and actually invented computer architectures in their spare time on the weekends... I guess maybe that's the appeal of Amiga these days- one of the last few refugees still standing, refusing to cave in to the evil Intel empire and go x86...

-DN
I've got butterfingers!
Quote:
Amen! How does that quote go? "Linux is a great way to turn a $65,000 workstation into a 200mhz Pentium."


From the Unix Haters Handbook: "How to Make a 50-MIPS Workstation Run Like a 4.77MHz IBM PC."...

-DN

_________________
I've got butterfingers!
What is it, and why is it built inside a box that appears to be 4-6mm thick metal?

_________________
I've got butterfingers!
They do.

The latches that are visible hold the panel on the side of the computer. The same mechanical part has a pin facing downward into each drive bay. When the lever on the back side is closed, that pin pushes forwards to the front of the case- locking in the drive carriers as well as locking the case panel. You can see the T cutout in the drive carrier if you pull one of the drives. If you remove the panel then re-lock the lever, you won't be able to yank any of the disk drives out.

They probably designed it like that so the drives wouldn't slide out of the bays or make contact with the panel and cause it to vibrate.

-DN

_________________
I've got butterfingers!
SAQ wrote:
The recommendation is not to vacuum computers because the vacuum hose can develop a very strong static charge. If you have access to a compressor that's good, otherwise lung power can get many of the dustbeasties out.


This.

I was once vacuuming out a bunch of old antiquated terminal server gear which had a whole bunch of dust clumps all over the inside of the chassis. At the time I didn't think anything of it, and used the house vacuum to clear out the machine. Of course the vacuum hose wasn't grounded and happened to be made out of plastic, so the static charge that was built up by the dust moving down the hose was rather impressive- enough to leap a 2" air gap with a sharp bang straight into the PCB.

That piece of equipment never operated properly again.

If you want to vacuum computer equipment out, please please please invest in a proper ESD safe vacuum cleaner. They cost anywhere from $100 to $300, the most typical models (which were sold by 3M and about a dozen other companies) resemble a black toolbox with a handle. The hose on those machines is electrically grounded via a three prong power plug, and the entire assembly is rated to suck up something as fine as toner without igniting it.

If you don't want to do that, then buy a $5 can of compressed air and use that instead.

Please, please please don't use your house vacuum cleaner. You can permanently damage your equipment, even if you're being careful with it.

-DN

_________________
I've got butterfingers!
Thanks for the comments.

I think I'm going to keep the majority of my collection for now. I apologize if I made it seem like I was going to sell it all, I kind of posted the above in a semi-drunk fit of "fuck everything" depression (divorce went through last weekend, then I had to put down my Maine Coon three days later due to a formerly undiagnosed blood cancer). At the time all I was doing was work to keep my mind off everything and for some reason I thought that would be all I'd want to do from now on.

I will probably be selling the K570 (switching to a more manageable C8000), RS/6000 (-> Power 275), and ALR Revolution 6x6 (might try and buy a BeBox instead, the only thing the ALR has going for it is the LCD touchscreen and that novelty wears off after 10 minutes of listening to the thing in operation). I'll post that stuff here when I decide if nobody I know wants it first. I seem to have a lot of room in my house suddenly, so I might land up converting one of the bedrooms into an air-conditioned server room and installing desks around the entire wall perimeter for everything to live on in a less dungeon-like environment.

smj wrote: I would clone the system disk so that my Omron Luna 88k has something to boot from.

I'll see what I can do. I've never been able to get networking running on that machine for some reason, so I can't dump the disks to NFS. I'll have to unpack my SCSI drives and clone it to that, then try and get an image off there through another machine that has SCSI and network capabilities. At the same time, the machine did come with a bunch of tapes- they might be the installation sources for Mach, I'm not sure. If I can pull the drive and hook it up to another system then I'll try and image the tapes for you too.

-DN
I've got butterfingers!
Lian Li or Abee ( http://abee.co.jp/Store/CASE.html ).

I just picked up an Abee AS Enclosure X3 for my most recent PC build. It wasn't cheap at all (cost me close to $600 to get one up here in Canada), but damn was it worth it. I've never seen such a nice case in all my life- the build quality is absolutely incredible, and blows anything Lian Li has ever made out of the water.

IMHO; Lian Li is still great as long as you stay away from their silly cases with the cutouts for water cooling and what not on the back. For whatever reason, I've always found the construction of those cases to be pretty flimsy. Their newer units without all that fluff are pretty solid though.

-DN
I've got butterfingers!
Greetings to all!

Just wondering, does anyone here have any copies of IBM PCOMM TCP/IP for OS/2 (version 4.1 or above)?

I'd be more then happy to pay for a copy, I'm just having a hard time tracking down any edition for OS/2 (not Windows).

-DN
I've got butterfingers!
> Sorry, it's OS/2 PC Communications for Windows.

Thanks for looking anyways!

-DN
I've got butterfingers!
I've recently come to own a Sun Unified Storage 7410 setup. It appears to be a standard Sun branded 2U AMD Opteron server strapped to a J4440 disk array (24 disks). It looks like there's 20x 1TB mechanical disk drives and two unknown units that look more like SSDs then anything.

I've booted up the machine and it appears to run some sort of embedded version of OpenSolaris that has a nifty web GUI on it. I can login to the machine via my web browser and configure everything, but the software empowering it is quite old (2010). I see that Oracle still supports these machines and they've apparently released quite a few versions of the OS since then, but naturally I need a support contract to download anything.

I'm pretty sure I already know the answer to this question, but am I screwed? I know there was a huge paradigm shift many years ago where everyone collectively decided to lockup their patches (I still remember a day and age where SunSolve was free and you could get anything you wanted from Sun without trouble). I'm guessing that there's probably no way to get Oracle patches without one of their support contracts, but I just wanted to check first to be sure. If I can't get access to the software then I'll probably just dump the entire setup on eBay and buy something more SOHO friendly instead.

-DN
I've got butterfingers!
I'd be lying if I said I wasn't struggling to find a use for this thing. It's big, it's heavy, it's loud, and it sucks up a fair amount of power. My primary attraction to it was the iSCSI target abilities, since I wanted to mess around with netbooting various clients around the house via iPXE (sanboot). I've been told that they've made many improvements to this (and the system as a whole) over the years, and that the more recent versions of the software are a definitive improvement over the old.

That's about all I know. The system didn't cost me anything more then a 6 hour trip each way (about $40 in gas), so I'm not inclined to invest any money in an Oracle support contract. I'm very tempted to sell it for a few thousand bucks, but I've heard good things about these systems in the past (specifically the software stack), and since I love twiddling around with stuff I was kinda hoping to give it a go and see what it's like.

So I suppose the answer to your question is "I have no idea". The only thing I know for sure is that I keep reading about how much more awesome the new software is over the old. Maybe that's just Oracle marketing PR (it seems like a few of the Fishworks guys left after the whole Sun takeover thing), maybe not. I have no idea unless I can get my hands on the patches to try it out.

-DN
I've got butterfingers!
I spent the majority of the evening messing around with the system. It seems fairly impressive when it works, but otherwise glitchy as hell. I couldn't maintain an iSCSI connection for more then 4 hours and CIFS sharing seems broken in more ways then one. I love the web GUI, but it doesn't seem like a very reliable appliance at the moment.

I've tried asking about this elsewhere on the internet and the response is just "yeah, that's because you're running ancient software, you should upgrade". Hence my original post- I think this machine is running one of the first, if not *the* first release of the Fishworks. There's been at least four major patches since then (2010.Q3.2.1, 2010.Q3.4.2, 2011.1.4.2, and 2011.1.9.2) that need to be applied in order.

So again, what can I do (if anything)?

-DN
I've got butterfingers!
Okay, do how do I get the patches?

Trying to download them from Oracle just results in an error message that says "You do not have the required access privilege to download this patch". Apparently I need to register at some MyOracle Support site, but that wants a support identifier and I quote:

Support Identifiers are the "contract" between your organization and Oracle. They define the privileges you have to file service requests, download patches and more. These privileges are approved and set by an administrator in your organization. You need at least one support identifier in your account to get to most features.


I obviously do not have one of these. What am I supposed to do? That was the whole point of my original post. I would get the patches if I could, but apparently I can't, unless there's some other way to get them that I haven't thought of (and yes, I've tried googling the hell out of them- the file names, release dates, everything- there's a few scattered around but not the right versions I need for the sequential update path).

-DN
I've got butterfingers!
Yup.

I've filed so many bug reports on this issue alone it's ridiculous. The few responses I got back from Apple Engineering were all along the line of "we're doing things the way we think they should be done and you're clearly wrong".

OS X won't enable a GPU unless it has a monitor plugged into it. There is no way around this, short of hex editing the kernel extensions, but even then I never got anywhere with that. If the local GPU is disabled, then OS X will default to a software rendering system which is capped to 1280x1024 due to severe performance issues (as you've already found out). Those issues are so bad under 10.9 and 10.10 that VNC is virtually unusable without a GPU installed and active in the system.

You can either plug in a monitor, or invest in one of those fake HDMI or Mini DisplayPort "monitor emulators" that trick OS X into thinking a display is connected. HOWEVER , there is a pretty serious caveat with this- if your dongle emulator reports a display size greater then 2560x1600, OS X 10.9 and above will think that it's a HiDPI display and completely screw up your VNC connection to the point of being utterly worthless. There is no way to disable that functionality, so if you're buying a dongle make sure it's not a 4K model (like the CompuLab fit-Headless 4K).

TLDR; remote controlling OS X is a huge bag of hurt. Apple don't give a shit, and there are no workarounds :( . Welcome to the future of consumer oriented computing...

-DN
I've got butterfingers!
There's a little known upgrade board for these printers that is just as complicated.

It was called the Xante Accel-a-writer II. It had a Am29000 RISC processor, slots for 72-pin SIMMs, offered a SCSI port you could plug an external disk drive into for font storage, and had a standard PC centronics port on the back so you could use the printer with an IBM PC. It did postscript in hardware as well as some of the HP languages. I owned one for a few years and it was a pretty awesome upgrade. I seem to recall it unlocked the 600 DPI capabilities of the printer engine (which was a standard Canon unit used by a variety of different manufactures), which is something the stock Apple board couldn't do.

Here's some pictures of the unit (the only pictures I could find on the internet). Seems like they were rare to begin with, if I would have known just how rare they were, I wouldn't have trashed mine.




-DN
I've got butterfingers!
I think it's a bug in OS X.

I'm running an APC 1500VA Smart UPS over here (2010 Mac Pro). Under 10.8, when the UPS does a self test, I get a dialogue warning about the system running off backup power and that I should save my work and shutdown soon. I can just click "OK" and get on with life, nothing actually happens unless the UPS hits 25% remaining battery (which is what I've configured in System Preferences).

When I was trying out 10.11, the UPS did another self test and everything closed up and the system turned itself off. I was able to replicate this behaviour simply by pulling the power plug on the APC and then plugging it in 5 seconds later. Even if I managed to abort the shutdown sequence in the GUI, OS X would terminate WindowServer a few seconds later and the system would go down regardless.

I've filed radar bugs on this, and as usual received absolutely no acknowledgement that it's even an issue. I've since gone back to 10.8, my next workstation will be a PC as I'm done dealing with these sorts of bugs-that-never-get-fixed from Apple. They clearly have other priorities these days.

-DN
I've got butterfingers!
Just a quick update...

Apparently I got through to someone on radar, and they're looking into the issue. Whether or not that means anything is going to get fixed is something else entirely, I've been in contact with Apple before regarding well known SMC bugs on the Mac Pro and that conversation ended with them giving me some insanely contrived example of why things were "working as intended" even though they clearly were not.

Anyways...

I've been told that the majority of magic happens in the PowerManagement project, specifically through powerd and ioupsd. The source code is available for either (supposedly) here:

http://opensource.apple.com/source/Powe ... -572.20.5/

Unfortunately the difference between PowerManagement-321.24.1 (Mac OS X 10.8.5) and PowerManagement-572-20.5 (Mac OS X 10.11.2) is fairly radical, so at first glance I have absolutely no idea what could be causing the issue other then ioupsd having been rewritten sometime between 10.8 and 10.11. It might be possible to compile the older versions for the newer OS (depending on how much has changed elsewhere) and just replace the binaries yourself to get things functioning again (assuming you disable SIP first on 10.10+).

I've also been told that apcupsd should work fine on OS X ( http://www.apcupsd.org ). Completely disabling the UPS management under OS X (uncheck everything in System Preferences) should prevent OS X from shutting itself down, at which point you can rely on apcupsd to gracefully halt the system instead.

-DN
I've got butterfingers!