An older post, but...
jan-jaap wrote:
... I know others (Ian M. ?) like Maxtor disks.
Ahh that's a distant memory. I guess you must be thinking of way back when I had a Maxtor Atlas 15K II 147GB as my Fuel's
system disk. Was nice, but I upgraded later to a Fujitsu 300GB 15K which was even quicker, but now my Fuel/900 has the system
disk split across a 60GB SSD in an ARS-2160 bridge box, and a 120GB SSD connected to an LSI SAS3442X-R card, so all
accesses to /var and /usr are waaaay quicker than any of the SCSI disks (which includes all user account files, though my 'ian'
account is on its own 120GB SSD anyway):
Code:
# req_size fwd_wt fwd_rd bwd_wt bwd_rd rnd_wt rnd_rd
# (bytes) (MB/s) (MB/s) (MB/s) (MB/s) (MB/s) (MB/s)
#---------------------------------------------------------
4096 39.75 33.27 39.94 33.07 39.70 22.56
8192 69.13 57.90 69.70 53.91 69.68 30.46
16384 109.03 92.98 107.86 79.81 110.71 54.90
32768 153.29 131.74 153.74 103.54 153.02 90.66
65536 192.25 170.21 188.90 151.19 193.54 137.95
131072 220.07 209.69 217.79 195.31 218.80 182.74
262144 238.19 233.02 234.89 228.38 238.00 220.60
524288 247.30 251.77 248.45 248.34 246.96 246.07
1048576 252.74 263.24 253.12 261.81 252.85 261.06
2097152 256.56 269.65 255.59 269.41 255.87 269.02
4194304 257.14 274.21 262.54 273.46 257.71 273.34
Access speed to the root file system is also much quicker than a SCSI disk for small request size random I/O, which is
the limiting factor for general responsiveness, though the max sequential I/O is limited by various factors (but not that
relevant since most accesses are to /usr and /var anyway):
Code:
# req_size fwd_wt fwd_rd bwd_wt bwd_rd rnd_wt rnd_rd
# (bytes) (MB/s) (MB/s) (MB/s) (MB/s) (MB/s) (MB/s)
#---------------------------------------------------------
4096 15.61 15.08 15.61 15.04 15.61 11.21
8192 27.60 26.31 27.61 25.78 27.60 20.25
16384 45.27 41.56 45.17 39.89 45.16 33.62
32768 65.11 57.68 65.03 53.21 65.06 49.96
65536 83.16 82.34 83.60 78.51 83.59 74.61
131072 83.90 88.09 84.12 86.10 83.72 82.44
262144 85.92 92.85 86.19 92.64 85.38 89.58
524288 86.54 95.23 86.59 95.01 86.45 94.01
1048576 85.89 95.07 86.03 95.20 85.67 94.25
2097152 83.88 93.19 84.30 93.03 84.22 92.20
4194304 80.13 88.45 80.15 88.15 80.08 87.66
4K random read is 15X faster than the quickest SCSI disk I've tested so far (Fujitsu MAX 36GB 15K).
But jan-jaap is right, the later Seagate 15Ks are nice overall, inparticular the ST3146855LC. However, other disks are
much the same, while for storing general data there are much better SAS options such as the Seagate 15K.7 (ST3600857SS)
which can do more than 200MB/sec sequential I/O.
See my
Fuel hinv
for updated details re the SSDs.
Ian.
PS. jan-jaap, I've standardised now on the Fujitsu MAX3036NC for system disks in Octane, and the MAS3367NC for O2
and Fuel. Both are pretty quiet, but the MAS inparticular makes very little noise, ideal for O2 and Fuel. My gateway O2
(modded PSU fan) has a MAS installed; but for the green LED I wouldn't know it was even turned on.