The collected works of toxygen - Page 2

Hi,
we are building a small disk array in our studio and I would like to ask what would be the best setup to use.
We did some benchmarks, but we have all but the time to tweak & test all filesystems/parameters.

So, my question would be if anyone here has experience with similar setup. (9 x 1.5TB hdd)
Primary task for the array is shared storage for video files (20-30gb each).
So far, we have been using 7 x 1.5TB and ext3, which has become quite laggy over time (creating directory takes more than 20 seconds if the utilization of array is above 80%). We used raw raid5+ext3, no lvm.

Do you think the setup mentioned in subject is ok, and if so, what parameters to use for xfs?

thanks for any suggestions

_________________
:Indigo2IMP: :Octane: This post was typed using dvorak keyboard layout - http://www.dvzine.org
kjaer wrote:
Putting nine drives into a single RAID5 is arguably suboptimal.


what do you suggest then?

_________________
:Indigo2IMP: :Octane: This post was typed using dvorak keyboard layout - http://www.dvzine.org
thank you all for explanation about pros and cons of the alternative.
I'm thinking about leaving current setup: 7 disks in raid5 with ext3 as it is and buying one more disk, so I can build another array with xfs on top of lvm on top of raid5 on top of 3 disks.
And over time, I'll try to migrate stuff from old array to new one with simultaneously extending it.
Maybe one last question, what xfs tweaks do you suggest (chunk size, log size, ...)?



fu wrote:
-if you're in production, don't touch anything till the project is out

there is always some project going on. we have never been in state [idle] as far as i can remember.

fu wrote:
-you have to do this, hit a pause for a few days and do decent tests (w/ realistic video chunks not just the default diskperf stuff). quick+dirty tests are ok for editing shots of your dog doing tricks on a netbook.

well, the thing is i cannot hit pause for a few days :) if i could I wouldn't be asking for help here.

_________________
:Indigo2IMP: :Octane: This post was typed using dvorak keyboard layout - http://www.dvzine.org
tunkaflux wrote: This article explains the whole issue in a 12TB+ RAID-5 array: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/storage/why-raid-5-stops-working-in-2009/162


wow, interesting. thanks for sharing
:Indigo2IMP: :Octane: This post was typed using dvorak keyboard layout - http://www.dvzine.org
How much did it cost you?
:Indigo2IMP: :Octane: This post was typed using dvorak keyboard layout - http://www.dvzine.org
:) check 0:33 in the video in the article http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/chi ... story.html
:Indigo2IMP: :Octane: This post was typed using dvorak keyboard layout - http://www.dvzine.org
vishnu wrote:
toxygen wrote: :) check 0:33 in the video in the article http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/chi ... story.html

How the heck did you spot that in the 1 second it was on the screen? :shock:

I do not know about others, but when I see stuff on displays in videos like that, I have this urge to identify what system and applications it is running

maybe some anecdote you will appreciate, I was watching some russian reportage on satellites which was shot in military satellite communication complex and boom, there it was, orbit data for american secret spy satellite :)
i might try to find the link, if you are interested :)

vishnu wrote: Presumably it's a Windows 8 take on the original 4DWm classic, source code from 1992 attached for everyone's viewing pleasure. 8-)


I tend to agree with josehill here. In satellite control business it's normal to run old systems because it's cost effective (no need for sw rewrite - nasa still keeps some old sun workstation to process voyager data) :) .
:Indigo2IMP: :Octane: This post was typed using dvorak keyboard layout - http://www.dvzine.org
here we go: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=p ... B53Q89vOIw

check 2:05

I bet it was intentional, because only selected satellites are displayed.

2001044001 = USA-161
some info about that satellite: http://sattrackcam.blogspot.nl/2011/09/ ... -with.html or just google it :)
orbit data for satellites like this are pretty valuable asset to nations which do not have ability to monitor the whole skies (which is like everyone except g8)
:Indigo2IMP: :Octane: This post was typed using dvorak keyboard layout - http://www.dvzine.org
SGI stock price is at historical low. Time to buy?
:Indigo2IMP: :Octane: This post was typed using dvorak keyboard layout - http://www.dvzine.org
Watching it, mediocre show but great costumes :)
:Indigo2IMP: :Octane: This post was typed using dvorak keyboard layout - http://www.dvzine.org
I guess sgi forums is not the best place to ask for financial advice :)
:Indigo2IMP: :Octane: This post was typed using dvorak keyboard layout - http://www.dvzine.org