guardian452 wrote:
Right, the last auto accident I was involved in I was walking in a crosswalk and was hit by a driver DUI (on oxys) who was turning left and didn't stop. The police let her go without even a citation. At least she was honest and admitted she shouldn't have been driving. I hope things like this can be prevented by AVs.
I think it is unwise to put intoxicated people behind the wheel of any vehicle. And autonomous vehicles, in order to have redundancy, are going to require manual override controls. Putting that in the control of someone is high is something I don't recommend in the least.
guardian452 wrote:
Sometimes I weep for humanity. So did insurance buy that BS about your ABS not working, or was it just an excuse for mommy and daddy? Because whenever a young 20-something rear-ends an innocent victim, they always have someone else to blame. Some of us here actually know how ABS pumps work because we've had to sit through many long design meetings about their control software. So you were already on the brake and beyond the limits of the car on a public road. Just admit it.
I only race on private land. I don't speed on the highway, and hell fucking no in the Hampton-Roads Bridge Tunnel. I am lucky that there's a 3 mile stretch of private road that I am permitted to use for this purpose. 157 mph would put me in jail for over a month in VA as we have a punishment of every mph over 90 is 1 day in jail, at the judge's discretion, plus class 1 misdemeanor charges on top including up to 5,000 in fines. I would be retarded to drive like that on a public road. So what I said re. speeding a Cobra is not relevant to what I later said.
No, the ABS didn't fail. The system overcompensated. You see, the HRBT has asphalt cut into sections with steel expansion joints between them. It was steady 35 mph traffic and I was driving an automatic 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer ES. Not an EVO, not a fast car, and I was driving under the 35mph limit.
I was not distracted, the road was dry and I stayed ~60ft behind the car I rear ended. So what happened?
I hit the brakes, but I didn't hit it enough to trigger the ABS. One of the floor joints struck my wheels and likely locked one or more of my brakes, triggering ABS. The car skidded diagonally, passenger side first into the SUV. I could not steer around it, as ABS proponents claim to be an advantage, because to my left was a wall, to my right was a line of cars in heavy traffic. I could do nothing and there were other cars that wrecked ahead of us, but they were considered separate, as this crash didn't touch that crash.
I know you're an engineer but guess what, SO AM I. ABS systems work on the principle of toggling brake pressure to avoid wheel lockups. It does not work well when the conditions are anything other than level, dry pavement. I was traveling on a dry, yet downward grade, which puts excessive load on the front wheels, with uneven surfaces. ABS is a computer based system based on modeling and sensor input. It is far from a perfect system, and has often had people spinning out on ice here. You may chime in that ESC/TCS/DSC/whatever makes that not happen but that isn't true. It happens anyways. Because computers in cars are not and will not be ever sophisticated enough to reduce the problem to any wide degree.
Insurance in a tort state like VA doesn't care about how a crash happens. What they care about in a rear end wreck is who hit who. I hit the SUV, so I was declared at fault. Explanation would have made no difference because it wasn't going to change the outcome of the case. Pick and choose your battles.
However, I did get a "following too closely ticket" thanks to the asshole state cop. I hired legal counsel, drew up engineering diagrams and an explanation of the situation depicting what likely happened, along with some tests using a similar surface, with a similar grade, in a Lancer EVO at similar speeds. The evidence was sufficient to get the judge to dismiss it.
In 6 years of owning a drivers license, I've had a single speeding ticket, which was dismissed when a faulty VSS was determined to be the cause. I've had a single wreck. I am not proud of my record, but I refuse to consider myself a statistic and for that patronizing tone to be taken with me, when I'm far more responsible than I let on
So you're a walking, talking statistic driving society and regulation *towards* driverless cars and excessive surveillance devices.
I suggest you take the tinfoil hat off and stop reading internet screeds from salty idiots who think because they worked at a goofy lube for two months and learned how to change oil and tires they know more than the combined knowledge of an industry that has existed for well over a century. It's 2017 with 2018 models coming out, and there's still no trouble disabling these devices for whatever purpose you desire
You can disable TCS, but not ESC altogether, from what I have understood. ESC consists of several parts including skid control computer, yaw sensors and lateral acceleration sensors