regan_russell wrote:SupremeCmdr wrote: Any reason why the Carbon Emacs is preferred?
I'd suspect that since Emacs originated elsewhere, porting even part of it to Objective-C and cocoa would increase the likely-hood of bugs and bloat.
If I wanted to write superfast code on the Mac, I'd use C, Carbon, maybe some assembler and most importantly, profile the hell out of the code.
If I wanted to use all the features of OSX and ensure longevity of my software, I'd use Objective-C and Cocoa.
I am not a great Emacs fan.. I have only come a cross it in a couple of workplaces..
Regan
The Cocoa Emacs uses the original NextStep bindings, so basically it's just a checkout of the latest version of emacs from FSF, 23.* something. I built mine from the commandline like any normal OpenSource app.
I'll have to checkout the other one to see what the difference is.
Apple Unibody MBP 2.66Ghz, 8Gb OSX 10.6
Apple MacMini 1.83Ghz, 1Gb OSX 10.5
Apple Power Mac Cube 450Mhz, 256Mb, OSX 10.3 Sweet!
Sun Ultra10 440Mhz 1Gb, SunOS 5.10
http://gothmog.homeunix.net/blog
Apple MacMini 1.83Ghz, 1Gb OSX 10.5
Apple Power Mac Cube 450Mhz, 256Mb, OSX 10.3 Sweet!
Sun Ultra10 440Mhz 1Gb, SunOS 5.10
http://gothmog.homeunix.net/blog