nekonoko wrote:
Because it's not just the speed we're looking at here - it's the power requirement. SGI never offered systems that ran on a handful of watts.
Oh sure. But they were a hell of a lot closer than they were by going Itanic. In fact I remember Alex Cousein going on at great length about power and heat efficiency. We were all being force-fed "gotta upgrade to 2 ghz ! 3 ghz ! 4 ghz !" when what people actually needed was small, cool, quiet, low power. And that's where MIPS was a winner.
I can't help but think that more foresight on management's part would have found this niche years ago. Intel didn't want to do this - they like selling the big $$ products. This is something driven by real demand, just like the netbooks. We're back to the dead horse but this move to Atoms ? It's neat. And it's exactly what Alex Cousein was pushing in 1998. This could have been MIPS.
Anyone know what heppened to him, btw ? Pretty nice guy.