SGI: Development

HTML Editors for Irix

jeffcorbets
Who joined Feb. 8, 2005, 9:02 p.m.

Wrote the following at Oct. 13, 2005, 9 p.m...

In NekoWare we have Bluefish 0.7... CosmoCreate is getting a little behind the times... Composer is, well, Composer...

Has anyone tried compiling the latest version of Bluefish (1.0.4?) or NVu (Composer on steroids)? Is it a project worth tackling?

~Jeff Corbets

gandalf
From Italy
Who joined Aug. 25, 2004, 1:08 a.m.

Wrote the following at Oct. 14, 2005, 3:18 a.m...

gtk is evil...

and to really answer: no I haven't tried

foetz
Moderator
Who joined April 14, 2003, 4:34 a.m.

Wrote the following at Oct. 14, 2005, 1:32 p.m...

jeffcorbets wrote: In NekoWare we have Bluefish 0.7... CosmoCreate is getting a little behind the times... Composer is, well, Composer...

Has anyone tried compiling the latest version of Bluefish (1.0.4?) or NVu (Composer on steroids)? Is it a project worth tackling?

~Jeff Corbets

i made several nvu versions.
have a look into my folder.

r-a-c.de

jeffcorbets
Who joined Feb. 8, 2005, 9:02 p.m.

Wrote the following at Oct. 14, 2005, 8:26 p.m...

foetz,

Yeah, I peeked in your folder last night after I posted the message and saw Nvu 1.0... downloaded and fiddled with it early this morning. It's certainly better than Composer, but it is pretty slugish on my dual-processor Octane.

How about the latest Bluefish?

~Jeff Corbets

foetz
Moderator
Who joined April 14, 2003, 4:34 a.m.

Wrote the following at Oct. 15, 2005, 6:04 p.m...

jeffcorbets wrote: foetz,

Yeah, I peeked in your folder last night after I posted the message and saw Nvu 1.0... downloaded and fiddled with it early this morning. It's certainly better than Composer, but it is pretty slugish on my dual-processor Octane.

How about the latest Bluefish?

~Jeff Corbets

no smp support on all mozilla apps at all :cry:

so on a dual machine the second cpu is ignored...

i would go for a nice editor with synt.highl.

r-a-c.de

jimmer
Donor
From London, Ingerlund
Who joined Oct. 12, 2004, 3:54 p.m.

Wrote the following at Oct. 16, 2005, 12:50 a.m...

http://www.nedit.org

miunk
From quito
Who joined Feb. 8, 2004, 4:17 p.m.

Wrote the following at Oct. 16, 2005, 5:32 a.m...

Be careful /w nedit. I built an entire website using it, and once I deployed it I discovered that the encoding was not compatible with google's spider. So the google description was all jumbled and messy. They have since removed the site from their index, and have ignored my request to reinstate it.

foetz
Moderator
Who joined April 14, 2003, 4:34 a.m.

Wrote the following at Oct. 17, 2005, 11:06 a.m...

miunk wrote: Be careful /w nedit. I built an entire website using it, and once I deployed it I discovered that the encoding was not compatible with google's spider. So the google description was all jumbled and messy. They have since removed the site from their index, and have ignored my request to reinstate it.

that's strange. i used nedit for years as my primary editor and never had any issues.

r-a-c.de

Mare
From Portsmouth, UK
Who joined March 27, 2003, 7:31 a.m.

Wrote the following at Oct. 17, 2005, 12:03 p.m...

foetz wrote:

miunk wrote: Be careful /w nedit. I built an entire website using it, and once I deployed it I discovered that the encoding was not compatible with google's spider. So the google description was all jumbled and messy. They have since removed the site from their index, and have ignored my request to reinstate it.

that's strange. i used nedit for years as my primary editor and never had any issues.

Same here, I don't know where I would be without my NEdit and highlighting .pats files. I use it for everything!