hamei wrote:
jwp wrote:
Yes, but by now, the code base of CDE is very dated and lacks things like Unicode support.
Who cares ? Unicode unicode unicode ... who gives a shit ? How many people run more than one language on their computer ? (Besides me.) What good is it except for clueless web developers who take one look at your ip then "helpfully" change the language on you ? Fucking nitwits.
Thanks so much, morons. I really wanted my page to show up in Assyrian cuneiform. I swear to God, if I could lure all the world's web developers into one room, I'd turn on the fire sprinklers and drown them all.
Well I care because I'm constantly doing multilingual work (yes, every day, in terminals, text editors, and browser windows). In fact, I would have to say that most of the work I do on a computer is multilingual work. For me, not having a Unicode capable terminal is unacceptable, and not having a Unicode aware text editor is even more so. When setting up CDE, the first things that I have to do are to install replacements for the terminal and text editor, and fonts for them to use. Unicode just provides a standard multilingual encoding framework (a set of code points for every language and glyph).
The world has moved on since 1995, and supporting "code pages" that require about 10 different convoluted steps to set up, is crude, primitive, and low tech -- a remnant of the bad old days. Supporting Unicode is actually much simpler than supporting various language-specific incompatible encodings.