Miscellaneous Operating Systems/Hardware

laughing at fleaBay

Code:
urchin 1% whois ebay.com

Whois Server Version 2.0

Server Name: EBAY.COM.ZZZZZ.GET.LAID.AT.WWW.SWINGINGCOMMUNITY.COM
IP Address: 69.41.185.206
Registrar: TUCOWS.COM CO.
Whois Server: whois.tucows.com
Referral URL: http://domainhelp.opensrs.net

Server Name: EBAY.COM.ZOMBIED.AND.HACKED.BY.WWW.WEB-HACK.COM
IP Address: 217.107.217.167
Registrar: DOMAINCONTEXT, INC.
Whois Server: whois.domaincontext.com
Referral URL: http://www.domaincontext.com

Server Name: EBAY.COM.Z-A.MAKE.MONEY.AT.WWW.ONLINESUPPLIER.COM
IP Address: 66.135.192.87
Registrar: ENOM, INC.
Whois Server: whois.enom.com
Referral URL: http://www.enom.com

Server Name: EBAY.COM.IS.NOT.AS.1337.AS.GULLI.COM
IP Address: 80.190.192.34
Registrar: EPAG DOMAINSERVICES GMBH
Whois Server: whois.enterprice.net
Referral URL: http://www.enterprice.net

Server Name: EBAY.COM.AU
Registrar: PLANETDOMAIN PTY LTD.
Whois Server: whois.planetdomain.com
Referral URL: http://www.planetdomain.com

Server Name: EBAY.COM.ACQUIRED.BY.CALITEC.NET
IP Address: 85.190.27.2
Registrar: INTERNETWORX LTD. & CO. KG
Whois Server: whois.domrobot.com
Referral URL: http://www.domrobot.com

Domain Name: EBAY.COM
Registrar: MARKMONITOR INC.
Whois Server: whois.markmonitor.com
Referral URL: http://www.markmonitor.com


Earth to fleabay ! Earth to fleabay ! Time to wakey uppy !! :P

Code:
MarkMonitor is the Global Leader in Online Brand Protection.

Domain Management
MarkMonitor Brand Protection
¢
MarkMonitor AntiPiracy
¢
MarkMonitor AntiFraud
¢
Professional and Managed Services

Yup, Mark Monitor. Very professional, great management. I'll have you guys doing my work any day now ....
:D the stuff you get up to, hamei!

_________________
覇気元
Eroteme.org
The is neither Googles nor MarkMonitors fault. What you did is querying your whois server for "*google.com*" and some people with no life or a poor sense of humor have registered something that matches this expression. And for Amazon, Yahoo, etc etc.

The problem is how you parse this information (or fail to, actually ;) ) See how each of the *google.com* results has a different whois server? The whois result you were expecting is this one:
Code:
whois -h www.markmonitor.com google.com

That is, unless you're interested in that swinging sh*t :lol:

_________________
Now this is a deep dark secret, so everybody keep it quiet :)
It turns out that when reset, the WD33C93 defaults to a SCSI ID of 0, and it was simpler to leave it that way... -- Dave Olson, in comp.sys.sgi

Currently in commercial service: Image :Onyx2: (2x) :O3x02L:
In the museum : almost every MIPS/IRIX system.
Wanted : GM1 board for Professional Series GT graphics (030-0076-003, 030-0076-004)
jan-jaap wrote:
The is neither Googles nor MarkMonitors fault. What you did is querying your whois server for "*google.com*" and some people with no life or a poor sense of humor have registered something that matches this expression.

C'mon, you're taking all the fun out of it :D

I still wouldn't consider this much in the way of "brand protection" if every kindergartener on the planet can take you "brand" and stick it in front of *.poopooface.org :D
You must be aware there's a huge issue with abuse of "cousin domains" or "sister domains" -- domains registered deliberately because they look like or are a slight misspelling of a legit domain. My financial sector employer has a portfolio of thousands of these domains, which were either "defensive" registrations, or taken from bad actors during legal proceedings. Not unusual for a large bank to own tens of thousands.

So far I haven't run across any serious attempts to limit what people can do within their domain, like bill.gates.smokes.banana.peels.on.4chan.net, but all it takes is one bored/creative attorney...

PS - If your domain is being abused by phishers, have a look at DMARC - the biggest mailbox providers like MAGY (Microsoft, AOL, Google, and Yahoo), including NetEase in China and Mail.ru in Russia, have implemented DMARC checks to protect their customers. The blocking policies are most useful for larger operations with specifically customer-facing domains, because mailing lists and other forwarding that regular folks do would be impacted. But any domain owner can use it to request reports about what mail the big receivers see using their domain. Interesting stuff, where previously you might not have known that 32,768 messages a day were being sent to GMail using your domain from a particular machine in Romania. So you get that in aggregate reports, and some receivers will send you per-message details like the headers, URLs inside the message, and other interesting stuff if you want it.

The standard is open, and the plan is to turn it over to the IETF later this year.

_________________
Then? :IRIS3130: ... Now? :O3x02L: :1600SW: +MLA :Fuel: :Octane2: :Octane: :Indigo2IMP: ... Other: DEC :BA213: :BA123: Sun , DG AViiON , NeXT :Cube:
smj wrote:
PS - If your domain is being abused by phishers, have a look at DMARC - the biggest mailbox providers like MAGY (Microsoft, AOL, Google, and Yahoo), including NetEase in China and Mail.ru in Russia, have implemented DMARC checks to protect their customers.

It's sad because the Internet now is totally different than it was twenty years ago ... I'd personally like to see commercial uses of the net totally banned but that's not going to happen :shock:

So the next best thing may be something like the fruitcakes in Beijing do now : to register a *.cn domain you have to jump through hoops. You *must* have a license and it *must* match the domain name and they require a person to be responsible. No hiding behind corporate "personhood."

If you look at any Chinese websites that use a *.cn domain, they have a little ICP license number displayed somewhere on the front page. If you don't have that it's bye-bye birdy, site gets downed. With their incredible efficiency, the fifty ip's next to it on either side and the entire hosting provider probably get shut down, too :)

Can't say that I like this but Google has ruined the Internet anyhow, maybe strict controls like this would be an improvement. At least we don't have that useless fucking facebook clogging up everything.

They would have to be controls designed to benefit the country tho, not to benefit the mnc asshats. Good luck with that :(
hamei wrote:
[...]No hiding behind corporate "personhood."

[...]At least we don't have that useless fucking facebook clogging up everything.


Seems legit.