SAQ wrote:
Just noticed a couple-months-old post on the GCC list bringing up the possibility of obsoleting IRIX before 6.5 (and Solaris 7, Tru64 before 5.1).
Towards the end it looks like they're moving more to possibly obsoleting the o32 ABI or IRIX and maybe 5.3, but I don't know where that leaves 6.2.
This change is already done, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html
Quote:
Since 6.2 doesn't include a SGI compiler (IRIX 5.3 does), supports POSIX, is Y2k clean, and doesn't have a current (c99) MIPSpro compiler perhaps we should lobby for continued support.
I'll take a quote from Rainer Orths mail (
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-01/msg00510.html
):
Rainer Orth on gcc-devel wrote:
Unless someone strongly objects and steps up to provide testing and bug
fixing, I'll install a patch to enforce this within a week and announce
it on the GCC 4.5 changes page.
Unless you're going to do that then lobbying for continued support is pointless and disrespectful.
His reasoning for obsoleting is fair and I think it's the right decision.
Rainer has been the only GCC maintainer for IRIX for many years and the community owes him respect for a good job done.
Just be happy that IRIX 6.5 is still supported and that we're stuck with 4.4.x (or even 4.5.x) and not 3.4.6 for IRIX < 6.5.
Quote:
FWIW 6.3 and 6.4 are included in the original idea as well - I know some people run 6.3 on O2, haven't met any 6.4 people myself.
I've never seen a gcc testresult posted for IRIX 6.3 or 6.4.
It's a non-issue.
Quote:
We should be able to scrape up equipment for test builds here - I personally have a Challenge R10k that has a 6.2 system disk option.
Donating cycles to making the very best gcc 4.4.x (or 4.5.x) release possible for IRIX < 6.5 would be nice.
But someone still needs to be around to actually fix the bugs.
-tgc