Miscellaneous Operating Systems/Hardware

Netatalk?

SAQ
From Renton, WA
Who joined July 19, 2006, 8:37 a.m.
Wrote the following at Sept. 26, 2015, 8:47 a.m...
Looking around I noticed that Netatalk is currently at 3.1.x, but all of the Linux distros package 2.2.x. My suspicion is that this is your common, garden-variety "you're not my friend anymore" Linux hissyfit, (especially as BSD packages 3.1), but thought I'd check in to see if anyone knew anything more in depth. 3.1 has some advances over 2.2, and unfortunately some things require Linux and I'd like to minimize admin overhead.
"Brakes??? What Brakes???"

:Indigo: :Octane: :Indigo2: :Indigo2IMP: :Indy: :PI: :O3x0: :ChallengeL: :O2000R: (single-CM)
ClassicHasClass avatar
ClassicHasClass
Donor
From Sunny So Cal
Who joined July 25, 2012, 7:12 p.m.
Wrote the following at Sept. 26, 2015, 10:30 a.m...
No idea. I use an old EtherTalk-era Netatalk on my 1.5.2 NetBSD IIci. (1.6 wrecked EtherTalk.)
smit happens.

:Fuel: bigred , 900MHz R16K, 4GB RAM, V12 DCD, 6.5.30
:Indy: indy , 150MHz R4400SC, 256MB RAM, XL24, 6.5.10
:Indigo2IMP: purplehaze , 175MHz R10000, Solid IMPACT
probably posted from Image bruce , Quad 2.5GHz PowerPC 970MP, 16GB RAM, Mac OS X 10.4.11
plus IBM POWER6 p520 * Apple Network Server 500 * HP C8000 * BeBox * Solbourne S3000 * Commodore 128 * many more...